RESUMEN
Olipudase alfa is indicated for the non-central nervous system manifestations of Acid sphingomyelinase deficiency (ASMD). Anaphylaxis is a very rare and life-threatening adverse reaction described for this drug. Here, we report the case of a 2-year-old boy affected by chronic neurovisceral ASMD who experienced signs of hypersensitivity reactions to olipudase alfa since the administered dose of 1 mg/kg during dose escalation and a proper anaphylactic reaction during the second administration of the target therapeutic dose of 3 mg/kg. The treatment was stopped for 15 weeks and then a 7-step desensitization protocol with the infused dose of 0.03 mg/kg was applied. Subsequent gradual dose escalation was resumed, successfully reaching the dose of 0.3 mg/kg. Moreover, biochemical, and radiological disease indexes, which were increased during treatment discontinuation, have gradually improved since the restart of treatment. However, at the second administration of the dose of 0.6 mg/kg, the patient experienced another adverse drug reaction with facial urticarial rash and bronchospasm, requiring the administration of adrenaline, methylprednisolone, and inhaled salbutamol. This case report highlights the need to customize the olipudase alfa desensitization protocol according to individual tolerance and raises the issue of achieving the established therapeutic target in the most sensitive children. Synopsis: We report a case of anaphylaxis to olipudase alfa in a child affected by chronic neurovisceral Acid sphingomyelinase deficiency (ASMD) and describe a 7-step desensitization procedure. This procedure, with the total administered dose of 0.03 mg/kg, followed by gradual dose escalation, allowed to reach the dose of 0.3 mg/kg without adverse reactions; however, at the second administration of the dose of 0.6 mg/kg our patient presented another adverse reaction suggesting the need of a different desensitization strategy.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Mobile technology is increasingly prevalent in healthcare, serving various purposes, including remote health monitoring and patient self-management, which could prove beneficial to early hospital discharges. AIMS: This study investigates the transitional care program experience facilitating early discharges in a pediatric setting through the use of an easy-to-use mobile medical device (TytoCare™, TytoCare Ltd., Natanya, Israel). OUTCOMES: This study aims to assess the effectiveness of telehomecare in achieving complete resolution of diseases without readmission, compare the length of stay between intervention and standard care groups, and gather user and professional experiences. METHODS: A randomized open-label, controlled pilot study enrolled 102 children, randomly assigned to the telehomecare (TELE) group (n = 51, adopting early hospital discharge with continued home monitoring) or the standard-of-care (STAND) group (n = 51). Primary outcomes include complete disease resolution without readmission. Secondary objectives include recording a shorter length of stay in the intervention group. Surveys on user and professional experiences were conducted. A group of 51 children declining telemedicine services (NO-TELE) was also included. RESULTS: In the TELE group, 100% of children achieved complete disease resolution without readmission, with a median duration of stay of 4 days, significantly shorter than the 7 days in the STAND group (p = 0.01). The telemedicine system demonstrated efficient performance and high satisfaction levels. The NO-TELE group showed no significant differences in demographics or digital technology competence. Perceived benefits of telemedicine included time and cost savings, reduced hospital stays, and technology utility and usability. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that user-friendly mobile medical devices effectively facilitate early hospital discharges in a pediatric setting. These devices serve as a bridge between home and hospital, optimizing care pathways.