Right-Sided Infective Endocarditis: The Importance of Vegetation Size.

BACKGROUND: Right-sided infective endocarditis (IE) carries favourable prognosis compared to left-sided IE. However, the prognostic significance of vegetation size in right-sided IE is less well defined. This study reports the clinical, microbiological, and echocardiographic findings associated with right-sided IE and examines the predictors of adverse outcomes. METHODS: Consecutive adults admitted with isolated right-sided IE at an Australian tertiary referral centre between June 1999 and May 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were stratified according to intravenous drug user (IVDU) status. Culprit organisms, sepsis severity, treatment regimens, inpatient complications, and vegetation size were recorded. Hospital survivors were followed mean 6.9±4.8 years for late mortality and IE recurrence. RESULTS: Of 318 consecutive cases of IE, 60 (19%) were isolated right-sided IE and included in this study. Forty-three (43) (72%) patients were current IVDUs, who were younger and more likely to have hepatitis. The majority (90%) of patients were medically managed with multi-agent antimicrobial regimens (median three agents) for a total duration of median 91 days. In-hospital mortality was 3% (2/60). Septic emboli were found in 82% (49/60) of patients, were significantly more common among IVDUs but were not related to vegetation size. Survival after hospital discharge was 100% at 1 year, 96% at 3 years, and 89% at 5 years. Vegetation size >2 cm, chronic kidney disease, and Pitt bacteraemia score were independent predictors of all-cause late mortality. Freedom from IE recurrence was 93% at 1 year, 87% at 3 years, and 84% at 5 years. Vegetation >2.5 cm, prisoner status, and multivalvular IE involvement conferred higher risks of recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with right-sided IE and small vegetations do well with medical management and this should continue to be the preferred strategy. However, those with large vegetations have poorer late outcomes and may require more aggressive treatment and closer follow-up.

Predicting adverse outcomes in elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery using pre-operative troponin I levels.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac troponins are frequently measured as part of the pre-operative work-up of patients prior to coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). The utility of measuring these levels in elective patients, and the clinical implication of an abnormal result are unclear. The following study investigates the relationship between cardiac troponin I (cTnI) measured as part of a routine pre-operative work-up and outcomes following CABG. METHODS: From January 2010 to December 2012, 378 patients underwent isolated, elective CABG and had cTnI measured prospectively, as part of their pre-operative work-up. Patients were divided into normal (Group I) and elevated (Group II) cTnI groups. Pre-operative, operative and post-operative data were obtained from our institution's prospectively collected database. RESULTS: Elevated cTnI was present in 47 patients (12.4%) pre-operatively. Intra-operative variables did not differ between the elevated cTnI and control groups. Both 30-day mortality (Group I: 0.9% v Group II: 6.4%, p=0.03) and cardiac arrest (Group I: 1.5% v Group II: 8.5%, p=0.01) were significantly more frequent in the elevated cTnI group. In multivariable analysis, elevated cTnI remained a predictor for cardiac arrest (OR 5.8, 95% CI 1.2 - 29.2). CONCLUSIONS: Patients presenting for elective CABG frequently have elevated cTnI on pre-operative work-up. These patients may be at a greater risk of 30-day mortality and cardiac arrest. Routine pre-operative measurement of cTnI may alert clinicians to a higher operative risk.

Concomitant Mitral Regurgitation in Patients Undergoing Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Stenosis: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Concomitant mitral regurgitation (MR) is frequently seen in patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) for severe aortic stenosis (AS). When the severity of MR is moderate or less, the decision to undertake simultaneous mitral valve intervention can be challenging. METHODS: A systematic search of Medline, PubMed (NCBI), Embase and Cochrane Library was conducted to qualitatively assess the current evidence for concomitant mitral valve intervention for MR in patients with AS undergoing AVR. The primary outcome for this systematic review was the postoperative change in the severity of MR and other outcomes of interest included factors that predict improvement or persistence of MR and long-term impacts of residual MR. RESULTS: A total of 17 studies were included. The percentage of patients demonstrating improvement in MR severity following AVR ranged from 17.2% to 72%; the studies that exclusively included patients with moderate functional MR and reported longer term echocardiographic follow-up of greater than 12 months demonstrated an improvement in MR severity of 45% to 72%. CONCLUSION: This systematic review demonstrates that a proportion of patients can exhibit an improvement in MR following isolated surgical AVR, but whether this confers any long-term morbidity and mortality benefit remains unclear.

Clinical outcomes of self-expandable vs. balloon-expandable TAVI for severe aortic stenosis.

Background: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an established therapy for patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). There is limited data exploring differences in outcomes post-TAVI SEV vs. BEV. This study compared procedural success and 30-d clinical outcomes self-expandable valves (SEV), vs. balloon-expandable valves (BEV) for patients with severe AS.Methods: Retrospective analysis was undertaken of patients receiving TAVI at St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne between August 2009 and May 2018. The primary endpoints included procedural success, clinical outcomes and complication rates at 30-d.Results: Out of 151 patients undergoing TAVI, 70 received (46.3%) SEV (Medtronic CoreValve & Evolut-R) and 81 (53.6%) BEV (Edwards SAPIEN-XT & S3). The mean Society of Thoracic Surgery (STS) risk score did not differ between the groups, SEV (83.6 ± 4.9 years, STS 4.4 ± 3.8) compared to BEV (82.3 ± 5.8 years, STS 4.9 ± 4.9). Procedural success was similar SEV 67 (95.7%) vs. BEV 78 (96.3%). Rates of ≥ moderate paravalvular aortic regurgitation (PAR) at 30-d were significantly higher in SEV compared to BEV (6.7 vs. 0.0%; p = .02). SEV patients had higher rates of pacemaker insertion (36.4 vs. 9.5%; p = .001) and stroke rates (12.4 vs. 1.4%; p = .04) compared to BEV patients. The difference in 30-d mortality between the two groups was similar (SEV 4.6% vs. BEV 1.3%; p = .23).Conclusions: This real-world retrospective analysis demonstrates higher rates of ≥ moderate PAR, stroke and pacemaker insertion with SEV compared to BEV at 30 d post-TAVI for severe symptomatic AS.

Preoperative atrial fibrillation is an independent risk factor for mid-term mortality after concomitant aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

OBJECTIVES: Preoperative atrial fibrillation (PAF) has been associated with poorer early and mid-term outcomes after isolated valvular or coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Few studies, however, have evaluated the impact of PAF on early and mid-term outcomes after concomitant aortic valve replacement and coronary aortic bypass graft (AVR-CABG) surgery. METHODS: Data obtained prospectively between June 2001 and December 2009 by the Australian and New Zealand Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons National Cardiac Surgery Database Program was retrospectively analysed. Patients who underwent concomitant atrial arrhythmia surgery/ablation were excluded. Demographic and operative data were compared between patients undergoing concomitant AVR-CABG who presented with PAF and those who did not using chi-square and t-tests. The independent impact of PAF on 12 short-term complications and mid-term mortality was determined using binary logistic and Cox regression, respectively. RESULTS: Concomitant AVR-CABG surgery was performed in 2563 patients; 322 (12.6%) presented with PAF. PAF patients were generally older (mean age 76 vs 74 years; P < 0.001) and presented more often with comorbidities including congestive heart failure, chronic pulmonary disease and cerebrovascular disease (all P < 0.05). PAF was associated with 30-day mortality on univariate analysis (P = 0.019) but not multivariate analysis (P = 0.53). The incidence of early complications was not significantly higher in the PAF group. PAF was independently associated with reduced mid-term survival (HR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.14-2.19; P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: PAF is associated with reduced mid-term survival after concomitant AVR-CABG surgery. Patients with PAF undergoing AVR-CABG should be considered for a concomitant surgical ablation procedure.

Intravenous leiomyomatosis with intracardiac extension - a review of diagnosis and management with an illustrative case.

Intravenous leiomyomatosis with intracardiac extension is an uncommon pathologic progression of uterine leiomyomata. It is a histologically benign condition, however due to interfence with right sided cardiac function patients may present with marked cardiovascular compromise and present a diagnostic dilemma to clinicians who are unfamiliar with this condition. Given the rarity of this condition, experience in individual institutions is usually limited to a few cases. We present an illustrative case and provide a review of the clinical presentation, preoperative assessment, operative approach, pathology and postoperative issues. The importance of a multidisciplinary approach to diagnosis and management is highlighted. Operative management aims to completely resect all tumour in the safest manner for the patient, most commonly via single or two stage operation. Where complete resection is achieved, recurrence appears to be a rare event.

Surgical ventricular restoration procedure: single-center comparison of Surgical Treatment of Ischemic Heart Failure (STICH) versus non-STICH patients.

BACKGROUND: Surgical ventricular restoration (SVR) was conceived to improve hemodynamic and clinical outcomes in ischemic cardiomyopathy. The Surgical Treatment of Ischemic Heart Failure (STICH) trial has conclusively shown no additional benefits of SVR when routinely combined with coronary artery bypass surgery. However, the STICH study did not include a registry arm for SVR-eligible patients who were not randomized. This study describes the SVR experience in a single center when participating in the STICH study, to better understand the role of SVR in current clinical practice. METHODS: All patients receiving SVR between 2002 and 2006 were prospectively followed. Patients were divided into STICH SVR (SSVR) and non-STICH SVR (NSSVR) groups. The SSVR patients received SVR as randomized in STICH. The NSSVR patients were evaluated for eligibility to participate in the STICH trial, and the reasons for not participating were analyzed. Baseline demographics, echocardiographic data, and clinical outcomes were compared. RESULTS: Nine NSSVR patients were compared with 12 SSVR patients. Only 1 NSSVR patient did not fulfill entry criteria into the STICH trial for randomization. The main reason for performing SVR outside of the STICH study was dominant heart failure symptom associated with enlarged left ventricle. The NSSVR group had more anterior wall asynergy (60% vs 45%, p < 0.001), larger preoperative heart volumes (left ventricular end-diastolic volume index 108 mL/m(2) vs 69 mL/m(2), p < 0.05) and larger volume reductions (34% vs 11%, p = 0.06). At 6.5-year follow-up, 83% SSVR and 89% NSSVR patients are alive. CONCLUSIONS: At our institution, patients eligible but not randomized into STICH, had larger preoperative heart volumes and larger volume reduction with SVR. The STICH study may not have included patients most likely to benefit from SVR.