[Relevance of meniscus loss for the progression of osteoarthritis and treatment options for early arthritis]. / Relevanz des Meniskusverlustes für die Arthroseprogression und Therapieoption bei bereits bestehender Früharthrose.

Meniscal tears are still one of the most frequent lesions in the knee joint. The relevance of meniscus loss for the development of osteoarthritis is undisputed. Meniscus repair, replacement and transplantation play an important role in the treatment of early arthritis, especially when they are a part of a master plan including alignment correction, stabilization and cartilage surgery, if needed. Scientific data show evidence concerning the protection of osteoarthritis, even though a lack of studies including comparison groups has to be admitted.

Prevailing disagreement in the treatment of complex patellar instability cases: an online expert survey of the AGA Knee-Patellofemoral Committee.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the current state of knowledge and potential controversies in the treatment of patellofemoral instability among orthopaedic/trauma surgeons in the German-speaking countries. METHODS: An online survey consisting of 32 questions and three fictitious cases was sent to members of the AGA-Society for Arthroscopy and Joint Surgery. Surgeons were defined by our senior authors as high-volume or low-volume surgeons, depending on the number of their cases. The treatment of 25% of patients with patellofemoral instability and/or the performance of 50 patellofemoral instability cases per year distinguishes high- from low-volume surgeons in this study. RESULTS: The online questionnaire was completed by 541 experienced knee surgeons from Germany (78%), Austria (10.9%), Switzerland (10.4%) and other countries (0.7%). Most surgeons prefer MPFL reconstruction as surgical intervention in patients with recurrent patellar instability (64-81%). Sixty percent of high-volume surgeons as compared to 21.8% of low-volume surgeons have ever performed a trochleoplasty. Of the overall respondents, 25% would not perform any surgical treatment on adolescents with patellar instability and an open growth plate. Of all responding surgeons, 95% would not treat patellofemoral instability with an isolated lateral release. This corresponds to recent literature showing poor outcome of its strictly isolated application. CONCLUSION: This study provides an overview of the current management of acute and recurrent patellofemoral instability in the German-speaking countries. Results show the surgeons' awareness for highly demanding surgical possibilities for complex patellar instability cases. However, disagreement among surgeons still prevails when it comes to selecting individual multimodal treatment options. This highlights the need for treatment guidelines and algorithms for patellofemoral instability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V.

Validation of the German version of the Kujala score in patients with patellofemoral instability: a prospective multi-centre study.

INTRODUCTION: The Kujala score is the most frequently used questionnaire for patellofemoral disorders like pain, instability or osteoarthritis. Unfortunately, we are not aware of a validated German version of the Kujala score. The aim of our study was the translation and linguistic validation of the Kujala score in German-speaking patients with patella instability and the assessment of its measurement characteristics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The German Kujala score was developed in several steps of translation. In addition to healthy controls, the Kujala German was assessed in consecutive patients undergoing reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament for recurrent patellar dislocations. Pre-op, 6 and 12 months postop the patients completed the Kujala German score, the KOOS, the Lysholm score, a VAS Pain, and the SF-12v2 scores. In addition, there was a Kujala German Score retest preop after a 1-week interval. RESULTS: We found high reliability in terms of internal consistency for the Kujala score (Cronbach's alpha = 0.87). Convergent validity with the KOOS (symptom r = 0.65, pain r = 0.78, ADL r = 0.74, sports/recreation r = 0.84, quality of life r = 0.70), the Lysholm score (r = 0.88) and the SF-12 physical component summary score (r = 0.79) and VAS pain (r = - 0.71) was also very high. Discriminant validity in terms of correlation with the SF-12 mental component summary Score was satisfactory (r = 0.14). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the German version of the Kujala score proved to be a reliable and valid instrument in the setting of a typical patellofemoral disease treated with a standard patellofemoral procedure.

[The basics of knee osteotomy : Clinical examination, analysis of the deformity and correction planning]. / Grundlagen der knienahen Osteotomie : Klinische Untersuchung, Analyse der Fehlstellung, Korrekturplanung.

Clinical results of knee osteotomies are good. A precise preoperative analysis of the deformity in three dimensions and accurate planning of the correction osteotomy is essential. All pathologies of the knee and the surrounding joints must be considered. The opening wedge technique and locking plate systems have improved accuracy and reliability. An analysis of deformities and the planning of their correction is presented in this article. Access to the extent of the correction according to the level of degeneration has proven useful in clinical praxis. Digital storage of the planning is recommended for legal reasons.

[Operative therapy of isolated patellofemoral arthritis. Biomechanics as a guide]. / Operative Therapie der isolierten patellofemoralen Arthrose. Biomechanik als Wegweiser.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of patellofemoral arthritis places high demands on orthopedists. The exact analysis of the underlying pathobiomechanical relationships is the basis for every therapy decision. METHODS: Soft tissue procedures, such as medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction for stabilization and bone interventions for alignment optimization (e.g. tuberosity transfer and corrective osteotomy) can play a role in treatment. In cases of advanced patellofemoral arthrosis these interventions can be used as well as in combination with partial joint replacement. For the choice of implant the use of anatomical prosthesis types is recommended because with these components the number of additional procedures can be reduced. CONCLUSION: The success of patellofemoral prosthetics depends mainly on the recognition of biomechanical deviations. If these can be corrected the risk of implant failure can be reduced.

Conservative versus tailored surgical treatment in patients with first time lateral patella dislocation: a randomized-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Patellar instability has a high incidence and occurs particularly in young and female patients. If the patella dislocates for the first time, treatment is usually conservative. However, this cautious approach carries the risk of recurrence and of secondary pathologies such as osteochondral fractures. Moreover, there is also risk of continuous symptoms apparent, as recurrent patella dislocation is related to patellofemoral osteoarthritis as well. An initial surgical treatment could possibly avoid these consequences of recurrent patella dislocation. METHODS: A prospective, randomized-controlled trial design is applied. Patients with unilateral first-time patella dislocation will be considered for participation. Study participants will be randomized to either conservative treatment or to a tailored patella stabilizing treatment. In the conservative group, patients will use a knee brace and will be prescribed outpatient physical therapy. The surgical treatment will be performed in a tailored manner, addressing the pathologic anatomy that predisposes to patella dislocation. The Banff Patellofemoral Instability-Instrument 2.0, recurrence rate, apprehension test, joint degeneration, and the Patella Instability Severity Score will serve as outcome parameters. The main analysis will focus on the difference in change of the scores between the two groups within a 2-year follow-up. Statistical analysis will use linear mixed models. Power analysis was done for the comparison of the two study arms at 2-year follow-up with regard to the BPII Score. A sample size of N = 64 per study arm (128 overall) provides 80% power (alpha = 0.05, two-tailed) to detect a difference of 0.5 standard deviations in a t-test for independent samples. DISCUSSION: Although several studies have already dealt with this issue, there is still no consensus on the ideal treatment concept for primary patellar dislocation. Moreover, most of these studies show a unified surgical group, which means that all patients were treated with the same surgical procedure. This is regarded as a major limitation as surgical treatment of patella dislocation should depend on the patient's anatomic pathologies leading to patellar instability. To our knowledge, this is the first study investigating whether patients with primary patella dislocation are better treated conservatively or operatively with tailored surgery to stabilize the patella. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study will be prospectively registered in the publicly accessible database www.ClinicalTrials.gov .