RESUMEN
Importance: High levels of ERBB2 (formerly HER2)-specific type 1 T cells in the peripheral blood are associated with favorable clinical outcomes after trastuzumab therapy; however, only a minority of patients develop measurable ERBB2 immunity after treatment. Vaccines designed to increase ERBB2-specific T-helper cells could induce ERBB2 immunity in a majority of patients. Objective: To determine the safety and immunogenicity of 3 doses (10, 100, and 500 µg) of a plasmid-based vaccine encoding the ERBB2 intracellular domain (ICD). Design, Setting, and Participants: Single-arm phase 1 trial including 66 patients with advanced-stage ERBB2-positive breast cancer treated in an academic medical center between 2001 and 2010 with 10-year postvaccine toxicity assessments. Data analysis was performed over 2 periods: January 2012 to March 2013 and July 2021 to August 2022. Interventions: Patients were sequentially enrolled to the 3 dose arms. The vaccine was administered intradermally once a month with soluble granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor as an adjuvant for 3 immunizations. Toxicity evaluations occurred at set intervals and yearly. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were collected for evaluation of immunity. Biopsy of vaccine sites at weeks 16 and 36 measured DNA persistence. Main Outcomes and Measures: Safety was graded by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3.0, and ERBB2 ICD immune responses were measured by interferon-γ enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot. Secondary objectives determined if vaccine dose was associated with immunity and evaluated persistence of plasmid DNA at the vaccine site. Results: A total of 66 patients (median [range] age, 51 [34-77] years) were enrolled. The majority of vaccine-related toxic effects were grade 1 and 2 and not significantly different between dose arms. Patients in arm 2 (100 µg) and arm 3 (500 µg) had higher magnitude ERBB2 ICD type 1 immune responses at most time points than arm 1 (10 µg) (arm 2 compared with arm 1, coefficient, 181 [95% CI, 60-303]; P = .003; arm 3 compared with arm 1, coefficient, 233 [95% CI, 102-363]; P < .001) after adjusting for baseline factors. ERBB2 ICD immunity at time points after the end of immunizations was significantly lower on average in patients with DNA persistence at week 16 compared with those without persistence. The highest vaccine dose was associated with the greatest incidence of persistent DNA at the injection site. Conclusions and Relevance: In this phase 1 nonrandomized clinical trial, immunization with the 100-µg dose of the ERBB2 ICD plasmid-based vaccine was associated with generation of ERBB2-specific type 1 T cells in most patients with ERBB2-expressing breast cancer, and it is currently being evaluated in randomized phase 2 trials. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00436254.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Vacunas de ADN , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Vacunas de ADN/efectos adversos , Vacunas de ADN/genética , Leucocitos Mononucleares/patología , ADN/uso terapéutico , Plásmidos , Receptor ErbB-2/genéticaAsunto(s)
Células HeLa , Películas Cinematográficas , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/historia , Investigación Biomédica/ética , Investigación Biomédica/historia , Familia , Femenino , Historia del Siglo XX , Humanos , Propiedad/historia , Propiedad/legislación & jurisprudencia , Consentimiento Presumido/historia , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Clinical evaluation of therapeutic tumor vaccines has resulted in examination and comparison of the types of immune function assays required to monitor tumor antigen-stimulated T cell effector function in immunized patients. Three of the most commonly used assays include ELISPOT, tetramer assay, and cytokine flow cytometry (CFC). Discussed are the method and principles for each assay and an assessment of important methodological, reagent, and data acquisition issues that are relevant for the accurate and effective use of the assays. The sensitivity and utility of the assays and present arguments advocating their integrated use in future immunomonitoring studies are also discussed.