Assessment and Simplification of Treatment Eligibility Among Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B Infection in Vietnam.

BACKGROUND: Treatment eligibility and the accuracy of its simplified criteria have been poorly documented in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection worldwide, especially in low- and middle-income countries. METHODS: From a cohort of HBV-infected patients in Vietnam, we assessed the proportion of patients eligible for treatment using the national guidelines based on reference tests (HBV DNA quantification and FibroScan); and the accuracy of simplified treatment criteria free from HBV DNA and FibroScan (Treatment Eligibility in Africa for the Hepatitis B Virus [TREAT-B] score and simplified World Health Organization [WHO] criteria) to select patients for antiviral therapy using the national guidelines as a reference. RESULTS: We analyzed 400 consecutive treatment-naïve HBV-monoinfected patients: 49% males, median age 38 years (range, 18-86), 32% hepatitis B e antigen-positive, median HBV DNA 4.8 log10 IU/mL (undetectable -8.4), median FibroScan 5.3 kPa (3.0-67.8), and 25% having significant liver fibrosis including 12% with cirrhosis. Of these, 167 (42%) fulfilled treatment criteria according to national guidelines. Using the national criteria as a reference, the performance of TREAT-B to select patients for treatment was high (area under the receiver operating characteristic [AUROC], 0.89 [95% confidence interval 0.87-0.92]) with a sensitivity of 74.3% and a specificity of 88.4%. In a subset of patients with 2 alanine aminotransferase measurements over a 6-month period (n = 89), the AUROC of TREAT-B was significantly higher than that of the simplified WHO criteria (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that a large proportion of patients with chronic HBV infection require antiviral therapy in Vietnam. Compared with the simplified WHO criteria free from HBV DNA quantification, TREAT-B is a better alternative to easily indicate treatment eligibility and might help scale up treatment intervention in Vietnam.

Rapid method for targeted prenatal diagnosis of Duchenne muscular dystrophy in Vietnam.

OBJECTIVE: Since there is no effective curative treatment for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), prevention mostly depends on genetic counseling and prenatal diagnosis. About two-thirds of the affected patients have large deletions or duplications, which can be detected by multiplex ligation-dependent amplification (MLPA). The remaining cases include small mutations, which cannot be easily identified by routine techniques. In such cases, linkage analysis may be a useful tool for prenatal diagnosis. Here we compared results obtained from linkage using short tandem repeats (STRs) with those by MLPA and sequencing analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight Vietnamese pregnant women at risk of having a baby with DMD and requesting prenatal diagnosis were recruited in this study. MLPA and direct sequencing were applied to screen large rearrangements and point mutations in the dystrophin gene in the DMD probands and the fetal samples. STR linkage was also performed to analyze fetal mutation status. RESULTS: By MLPA and sequencing analysis, five DMD patients showed deletions of the dystrophin gene, and no deletions of exons were detected in seven amniotic fluid cell samples; one patient harbored the out-of-frame small deletion of exon 43, which was also found in the fetal sample of this family. STR analysis revealed the transmission of a mutant allele inside each family. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the combination of STR and MLPA could be a rapid, reliable, and affordable detection protocol for determination of the carrier's status and prenatal diagnosis of DMD in a developing country such as Vietnam.