Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 72
Filtrar
Más filtros

País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 70: 318-325, 2021 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31917229

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Anesthesia modalities for carotid endarterectomy continue to vary nationally. We evaluated and compared short-term outcomes after carotid endarterectomy with general anesthesia (GA) and regional anesthesia (RA) in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. METHODS: The 2011-2015 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Participant Use Data Files (PUFs) with merged Vascular Procedure-Targeted PUFs for carotid endarterectomy were queried for patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy. Postoperative complications, mortality, and hospital length of stay in patients undergoing GA or RA were compared. RESULTS: A total of 14,447 patients were evaluated: 12,389 (85.7%) with GA and 2,058 (14.3%) with RA. The use of GA was inversely associated with patients' age (88.0% in patients aged 22-64 years vs. 83.4% in patients aged ≥80 years, P < 0.0001) and with symptomatic presentation (odds ratio [OR] = 1.25; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.13-1.38). There were no differences between GA and RA for in-hospital mortality, 30-day mortality, or postoperative complications of transient ischemic attack, stroke, bleeding, acute renal failure, or restenosis. However, rates of cranial nerve injury were significantly higher in GA than in RA (2.9% vs. 1.7%, respectively; P < 0.002) and confirmed by multivariable analysis (OR = 1.68; 95% CI: 1.19-2.39). Total operative time was also longer for GA than for RA (median: 115 minutes; Interquartile range (IQR): 89-145 versus median: 93 minutes; IQR: 76-119, respectively; P < 0.0001). Hospital length of stay was greater in GA than in RA (median: 1 day; IQR 1-2 vs. median: 1 day; IQR 1-1, respectively; P < 0.0001), as were 30-day readmission rates (6.7% vs. 5.4%, respectively; P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Iatrogenic nerve injury is a feared complication of carotid endarterectomy, especially in elective asymptomatic patients. RA reduces the rate of cranial nerve injury compared with GA. RA is also not inferior to GA for postoperative complications with the benefit of shorter operative times, lengths of hospital stay, and decreased 30-day readmission rates. Consideration should be given to more widespread adoption of this underused anesthesia modality.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia de Conducción , Anestesia General , Enfermedades de las Arterias Carótidas/cirugía , Traumatismos del Nervio Craneal/prevención & control , Endarterectomía Carotidea , Enfermedad Iatrogénica , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anestesia de Conducción/efectos adversos , Anestesia de Conducción/mortalidad , Anestesia General/efectos adversos , Anestesia General/mortalidad , Enfermedades Asintomáticas , Enfermedades de las Arterias Carótidas/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades de las Arterias Carótidas/mortalidad , Traumatismos del Nervio Craneal/etiología , Bases de Datos Factuales , Endarterectomía Carotidea/efectos adversos , Endarterectomía Carotidea/mortalidad , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Readmisión del Paciente , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
2.
J Card Surg ; 36(7): 2400-2406, 2021 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33821496

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Octogenarians undergoing cardiac surgery have higher mortality than their younger counterparts. OBJECTIVES: To determine if various risk factors have the same effect on mortality in octogenarians as in younger patients. METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample data set from 2004 to 2014 was queried to select patients aged 65 years and older who underwent either coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), valvular heart surgery (VHS), or both (CABG + VHS) within 10 days of hospital admission. The patients were divided into two groups 65-79 years and 80 years and greater. Hospital mortality, patient demographics, comorbidities, and type of hospital admission was evaluated and compared using χ2 and multivariable logistic regressions. RESULTS: About 397,713 patients were identified including 86,345 (21.7%) aged 80 and above. Octogenarians had higher in-hospital mortality for all procedures: CABG (4.94% vs. 2.39%, p < .001), VHS (5.49% vs. 4.08%, p < .001), and CABG + VHS (7.59% vs. 5.95%, p < .001), and this relationship persisted when gender, race, comorbidities, and type of hospital admission were controlled for: CABG (odds ratio [OR] = 1.71; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.62-1.81); VHS (OR = 1.18; 95% CI 1.11-1.27); and CABH + VHS (OR = 1.17; 95%CI 1.10-1.26). Female gender, renal, or heart failure, nonelective admission, and CABG + VHS were associated with increased risk of in-hospital mortality. Octogenarians had higher rates of these factors (p < .001). The effect size of renal and heart failure and type of surgery was smaller for octogenarians. CONCLUSIONS: Octogenarians undergoing cardiac surgery have higher rates of nonelective admissions, renal and heart failure, and female gender, which are most strongly associated with in-hospital mortality. Differing effect sizes suggest that certain risk factors, such as renal and heart failure, contribute more to mortality in younger patients.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Vasa ; 49(2): 99-105, 2020 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31021300

RESUMEN

Background: To evaluate trends in frequency, mortality and treatment for non-traumatic vascular emergencies (VE) in the US. Methods: VE in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (2005-2014) were identified. ICD-9 CM diagnosis and procedures codes captured six common VE. Results: 228,210,504 emergency admissions with 317,396 procedures for VE were estimated. Mean age was 67.8 years and were primarily men (56.1 %; p < 0.0001). The commonest VE was Acute Limb Ischemia (ALI) (82.4 %) followed by ruptured AAA (10.8 %) and Acute Mesenteric Ischemia (4.71 %). VE increased from 132.8 per 100,000 admissions in 2005 to 153.6 in 2014 (p < 0.001), with mortality decrease for all VE (13.8 % vs. 9.1 %; p < 0.0001). Length of stay decreased (median 8 vs. 7 days; p < 0.0001) but cost of care increased (median $ 25,443 vs. $ 29,353; p < 0.0001). Endovascular treatment increased overall for VE from 23.7 % in 2005 to 37.2 % in 2014 (p < 0.0001). Hospital mortality for VE decreased overall, except ruptured thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm with mortality decrease with endovascular treatment (34.3 vs. 11.1; p = 0.04) and mortality increase with open treatment (44.7 vs. 47.6; p = 0.06). ALI overall mortality decreased from 8.1 % to 5.7 % (p < 0.0001) due to reduced open surgical mortality from 9.6 % to 7.4 % (p < 0.0001); endovascular mortality did not improve over time (4.0 % vs. 3.4 %; p = 0.45). Hospital mortality also increased for endovascular treatment of ruptured thoracic aortic aneurysm (rTAA) from 14.9 % to 27.4 % (p = 0.0003) during this period. Conclusions: VE frequency increased with a decrease in overall mortality over time. Overall hospital stay has decreased but with an increase in the cost of care. Open surgical mortality for VE has also decreased overall, suggesting perioperative care improvements, with the exception of ruptured thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm. Endovascular utilization for VE has significantly increased; associated with lower mortality for most VE, although an increase in hospital mortality after endovascular repair of rTAA was seen. This may be due to an increased implementation of endovascular repair for patients not previously eligible for surgery due to high risk. We recommend careful selection of patients for rTAA treatment as mortality has increased despite endovascular therapy and at an increased cost of care.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal , Pacientes Internos , Anciano , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Rotura de la Aorta , Urgencias Médicas , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
Vascular ; 27(1): 71-77, 2019 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30193552

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Acute limb ischemia is a common vascular emergency requiring immediate intervention. Thrombolysis has been widely utilized for acute limb ischemia; the purpose of this study is to analyze contemporary trends, outcomes and complications of thrombolysis for acute limb ischemia. METHODS: Patients were identified from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (2003-2013) using ICD-9. Patients undergoing emergency thrombolysis for acute limb ischemia were evaluated. Three groups were analyzed: thrombolysis alone, thrombolysis and endovascular procedure (T+ENDO), and failed thrombolysis requiring open surgery (T+OPEN). RESULTS: A total of 162,240 patients with acute limb ischemia were estimated: 33,615 patients (20.7%) underwent thrombolysis as the initial treatment. Mean age was 66.2 ± 34.9 years with 54% male. The utilization of thrombolysis increased significantly during the study period (16.8-24.2%, p < 0.0001). The most common group was thrombolysis and endovascular procedure (40.7%), followed by thrombolysis alone (34.1%), and T+OPEN (25.2%). Thrombolysis and endovascular procedure increased significantly over time (31.6-47.8%, p < 0.0001) whereas thrombolysis alone and T+OPEN significantly decreased (39.6-28.6% and 28.7-23.6%, respectively, p < 0.0001). Overall mortality was 4.9%; thrombolysis and endovascular procedure compared to thrombolysis alone and T-OPEN had a lower mortality rate (3.2% vs. 6.1% and 5.9%, p < 0001). The overall stroke rate was 1.9%; thrombolysis alone had the highest stroke rate (3.0%, p < 0.0001) with thrombolysis and endovascular procedure the lowest (1.2%) and T+OPEN 1.7%. The highest amputation rate was T+OPEN (11.6%, p < 0.001) compared to thrombolysis and endovascular procedure (5.1%) and thrombolysis alone (5.3%). T+OPEN had the highest incidence of cardiac (5.5%), respiratory (7.3%) and renal complications (12.5%), pneumonia (4.0%), and fasciotomy (16.8%) (all p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Thrombolysis remains an effective treatment for acute limb ischemia with increased utilization over time. There was a significant increase in thrombolysis and endovascular procedure leading to improved outcomes. Thrombolysis alone carried the highest mortality and stroke rate, with T+OPEN associated with the highest amputation and complications. Although thrombolysis is effective, 25% of patients required an open procedure suggesting that patient selection for thrombolysis first instead of open surgery continues to be a clinical challenge.


Asunto(s)
Fibrinolíticos/administración & dosificación , Isquemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Extremidad Inferior/irrigación sanguínea , Terapia Trombolítica/tendencias , Enfermedad Aguda , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Amputación Quirúrgica/tendencias , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Terapia Combinada , Conversión a Cirugía Abierta/tendencias , Bases de Datos Factuales , Procedimientos Endovasculares/tendencias , Femenino , Fibrinolíticos/efectos adversos , Humanos , Isquemia/diagnóstico por imagen , Isquemia/mortalidad , Isquemia/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Selección de Paciente , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Factores de Riesgo , Terapia Trombolítica/efectos adversos , Terapia Trombolítica/mortalidad , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
5.
Vascular ; 25(5): 459-465, 2017 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28181855

RESUMEN

Objectives Chronic kidney disease (CKD) has been identified as a significant risk factor for poor post-surgical outcomes. This study was designed to provide a contemporary analysis of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) outcomes in patients with CKD, end-stage renal disease (ESRD), and normal renal function (NF). Methods The Nationwide Inpatient Sample data 2006-2012 was queried to select patients aging 40 years old and above who underwent CEA during two days after admission and had a diagnosis of ESRD on long-term hemodialysis, patients with non-dialysis-dependent CKD, or NF. Patients with acute renal failure were excluded. We subsequently compared procedure outcomes and hospital resource utilization in these patients. Results Totally 573,723 CEA procedures were estimated: 4801 (ESRD)' 32,988 (CKD)' and 535,934 (NF). Mean age was 71.0 years, 57.7% were males, and 73.7% were white. Overall hospital mortality was 0.20%: 0.69% (ESRD), 0.35% (CKD), and 0.19% (NF), p < 0.0005 between groups. The overall stroke rate was 1.6%: 1.8% (ESRD), 2.0% (CKD), and 1.6% (NF). Comparing NF to CKD there was a significant difference: p < 0.0001. For CKD patients, compared to NF patients, there was an increased risk in cardiac complications (odds ratio = 1.2; 95% CI 1.15-1.32), respiratory complications (odds ratio = 1.2; 95% CI 1.15-1.32), and stroke (odds ratio = 1.1; 95% CI 1.04-1.23). For ESRD patients compared to NF patients there was an increased risk in respiratory complications (odds ratio = 1.3; 95% CI 1.08-1.47) and sepsis (odds ratio = 4.4; 95% CI 3.23-5.94). Mean length of stay and cost were: 2.8 d and $13,903 (ESRD), 2.2 d and $12,057 (CKD), and 1.8 d and $10,130 (NF), all p < 0.0001. Conclusions Patients with ESRD undergoing CEA had an increased risk of respiratory and septic complications, but not a higher risk of stroke compared to patients with normal renal function. The greatest risks of postoperative stroke, respiratory, and cardiac complications were found in patients with CKD. A diagnosis of ESRD and CKD were both found to significantly increase hospital mortality, length of stay and cost. Where clinicians typically consider ESRD patients the highest risk for CEA, further consideration should be given to patients with CKD not yet on dialysis as they had the higher risk of cardiac complications and stroke compared to the others evaluated.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de las Arterias Carótidas/cirugía , Endarterectomía Carotidea , Fallo Renal Crónico/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedades de las Arterias Carótidas/economía , Enfermedades de las Arterias Carótidas/mortalidad , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Bases de Datos Factuales , Endarterectomía Carotidea/efectos adversos , Endarterectomía Carotidea/economía , Endarterectomía Carotidea/mortalidad , Femenino , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Cardiopatías/epidemiología , Costos de Hospital , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Riñón/fisiopatología , Fallo Renal Crónico/economía , Fallo Renal Crónico/mortalidad , Fallo Renal Crónico/fisiopatología , Tiempo de Internación , Modelos Logísticos , Enfermedades Pulmonares/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Oportunidad Relativa , Selección de Paciente , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/economía , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/fisiopatología , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
6.
J Emerg Med ; 53(3): 295-301, 2017 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28528722

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The multilevel designation system given to U.S. trauma centers has proven useful in providing injury-level-appropriate care and guiding field triage. Despite the system, patients are often transferred to Level I trauma centers for higher-level care/specialized services. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to assess whether there is a difference in outcomes of patients transferred to Level I centers compared with direct admissions. METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was queried to identify patients involved in motor vehicle accidents, using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification E-codes. Patients that were admitted to Level I trauma centers were identified using American College of Surgeons or American Trauma Society designations. RESULTS: There were 343,868 patients that met inclusion criteria. Of these patients, 29.2% (100,297) were admitted to Level I trauma centers, 5.7% (5691) of which were identified as trauma transfers. The lead admitting diagnosis for transfers was pelvic fracture (11.5%). Caucasians were 2.62 times as likely to be transferred as African-Americans (confidence interval 2.32-2.97), and 3.71 times as likely as Hispanics (confidence interval 3.25-4.23). Despite transfer patients having higher adjusted severity scores and higher adjusted risk of mortality, there were no differences in mortality (p = 0.95). CONCLUSIONS: Nationally, trauma transfers do not have an increase in mortality when compared with directly admitted patients, despite a higher adjusted severity of illness and higher adjusted risk of mortality.


Asunto(s)
Accidentes de Tránsito , Transferencia de Pacientes/estadística & datos numéricos , Centros Traumatológicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Heridas y Lesiones/mortalidad , Adulto , Anciano , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Triaje , Adulto Joven
7.
J Surg Res ; 205(2): 446-455, 2016 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27664895

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: After injury, base deficit (BD) and lactate are common measures of shock. Lactate directly measures anaerobic byproducts, whereas BD is calculated and multifactorial. Although recent studies suggest superiority for lactate in predicting mortality, most were small or analyzed populations with heterogeneous injury severity. Our objective was to compare initial BD with lactate as predictors of inhospital mortality in a large cohort of blunt trauma patients all presenting with hemorrhagic shock. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Glue Grant multicenter prospective cohort database was queried; demographic, injury, and physiologic parameters were compiled. Survivors, early deaths (≤24 h), and late deaths were compared. Profound shock (lactate ≥ 4 mmol/L) and severe traumatic brain injury subgroups were identified a priori. Chi-square, t-test, and analysis of variance were used as appropriate for analysis. Multivariable logistic regression and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis assessed survival predictors. P < 0.05 was significant. RESULTS: A total of 1829 patients met inclusion; 289 (15.8%) died. Both BD and lactate were higher for nonsurvivors (P < 0.00001). After multivariable regression, both lactate (odds ratio [OR] 1.17; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.12-1.23; P < 0.00001) and BD (OR 1.04; 95% CI: 1.01-1.07; P < 0.005) predicted overall mortality. However, when excluding early deaths (n = 77), only lactate (OR 1.12 95% CI: 1.06-1.19; P < 0.0001) remained predictive but not BD (OR 1.00 95% CI: 0.97-1.04; P = 0.89). For the shock subgroup, (n = 915), results were similar with lactate, but not BD, predicting both early and late deaths. Findings also appear independent of traumatic brain injury severity. CONCLUSIONS: After severe blunt trauma, initial lactate better predicts inhospital mortality than initial BD. Initial BD does not predict mortality for patients who survive >24 h.


Asunto(s)
Acidosis/etiología , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Ácido Láctico/sangre , Choque Hemorrágico/mortalidad , Heridas no Penetrantes/mortalidad , Acidosis/diagnóstico , Adulto , Anciano , Biomarcadores/sangre , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Curva ROC , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Choque Hemorrágico/sangre , Choque Hemorrágico/etiología , Índices de Gravedad del Trauma , Heridas no Penetrantes/sangre , Heridas no Penetrantes/complicaciones
8.
Brain Inj ; 30(4): 437-440, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26963433

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: After rural injury, evaluation at local hospitals with transfer to regional trauma centres may delay definitive care. This study sought to determine the impact of such delays on outcomes in patients with TBI within a mature regional trauma system. METHODS: The ETMC Level 1 Trauma registry was queried from 2008-2013 for patients with blunt TBI, aged ≥ 18 and admitted ≤ 24 hours from injury and stratified them as 'transfer' vs 'direct' admission. Demographics, transfer distance, transfer times and outcomes were compared using Chi-square, t-test and multivariable logistic regression; p < 0.05 was significant. RESULTS: During the study period, 1845 patients met inclusion criteria: 947 'direct' and 898 'transfers'. For transfers, median distance was 60.1 miles; mean time to initial care was 1.2 ± 2.7 hours and time to Level 1 care was 5.0 ± 2.4 hours. Transfer patients were older (56 vs 49 years; p < 0.01) and had more comorbidities, but had lower mean ISS (15.9 vs 18.8; p < 0.01) and lower mortality (7.0 vs 10.3%; p < 0.03), complications and LOS. Neurosurgical intervention was comparable (p = 0.88), as was mortality for patients with ISS ≥ 15 (12.4% vs 14.8%; p = 0.28). After regression analysis, advanced age and increasing ISS, not distance or time, predicted mortality. CONCLUSION: Neither transfer distance nor time independently contributed to mortality for TBI after rural injury. An established regional trauma system, with initial local stabilization using ATLS principles, may help reduce negative outcomes for injured patients in rural settings.


Asunto(s)
Lesiones Encefálicas/epidemiología , Lesiones Encefálicas/psicología , Transferencia de Pacientes , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Texas/epidemiología , Factores de Tiempo , Centros Traumatológicos , Índices de Gravedad del Trauma , Adulto Joven
10.
BMC Emerg Med ; 16(1): 23, 2016 07 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27392601

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Blunt carotid arterial injury (BCI) is a rare injury associated with motor vehicle collision (MVC). There are few population based analyses evaluating carotid injury associated with blunt trauma and their associated injuries as well as outcomes. METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) 2003-2010 data was queried to identify patients after MVC who had documented BCI during their hospitalizations utilizing ICD-9-CM codes. Demographics, associated injuries, interventions performed, length of stay, and cost were evaluated. RESULTS: 1,686,867 patients were estimated having sustained MVC; 1,168 BCI were estimated. No patients with BCI had open repair, 4.24 % had a carotid artery stent (CAS), and 95.76 % of patients had no operative intervention. Age groups associated with BCI were: 18-24 (27.8 %), 47-60 (22.3 %), 35-46 (20.6 %), 25-34 (19.1 %), >61 (10.2 %). Associated injuries included long bone fractures (28.5 %), stroke and intracranial hemorrhage (28.5 %), cranial injuries (25.6 %), thoracic injuries (23.6 %), cervical fractures (21.8 %), facial fractures (19.9 %), skull fractures (18.8 %), pelvic fractures (18.5 %), hepatic (13.3 %) and splenic (9.2 %) injuries. Complications included respiratory (44.2 %), bleeding (16.1 %), urinary tract infections (8.9 %), and sepsis (4.9 %). Overall mortality was 14.1 % without differences with regard to intervention (18.5 % vs. 13.9 %; P = 0.36). Stroke and intracranial hemorrhage was associated with a 2.7 times greater risk of mortality. Mean length of stay for patients with BCI undergoing stenting compared to no intervention were similar (13.1 days vs. 15.9 days) but had a greater mean cost ($83,030 vs. $63,200, p = 0.3). CONCLUSION: BCI is a rare injury associated with MVC, most frequently reported in younger patients. Frequently associated injuries were long bone fractures, stroke and intracranial hemorrhage, thoracic injuries, and pelvic fractures which are likely associated with the force/mechanism of injury. The majority of patients were treated without intervention, but when CAS was utilized, it did not impact mortality and trended toward increased costs.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos de las Arterias Carótidas/economía , Traumatismos de las Arterias Carótidas/epidemiología , Heridas no Penetrantes/economía , Heridas no Penetrantes/epidemiología , Accidentes de Tránsito/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Traumatismos de las Arterias Carótidas/terapia , Comorbilidad , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Femenino , Humanos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores Socioeconómicos , Heridas y Lesiones/epidemiología , Heridas no Penetrantes/terapia , Adulto Joven
11.
J Vasc Surg ; 61(4): 960-4, 2015 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25595396

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Cilostazol, an antiplatelet agent with vasodilating properties, has not been well evaluated in conjunction lower extremity revascularization (LER). We evaluated the association between cilostazol and limb salvage after endovascular or open surgery for LER. METHODS: Patients aged ≥65 years undergoing LER were identified from 2007 to 2008 Medicare Provider Analysis and Review and Carrier files using International Classification of Diseases-9 Edition-Clinical Modification and Current Procedural Terminology-4 codes. Covariates included demographics, comorbidities, and disease severity. Use of cilostazol was identified using National Drug Codes and Part D files. Outcomes were compared using χ(2) and Kaplan-Meier analyses and Cox regression. RESULTS: We identified 22,954 patients undergoing LER: 8128 (35.4%) with claudication, 3056 (13.3%) with rest pain, and 11,770 (51.3%) with ulceration/gangrene. Among them, 1999 patients (8.7%) used cilostazol before LER. More patients received endovascular (14,353) than open (8601) procedures. Cilostazol users had fewer amputations than nonusers at 30 days (7.8% vs 13.4%), 90 days (10.7% vs 18.0%), and 1 year (14.8% vs 24.0%; P < .0001 for all). Cox proportional hazards regression with adjustment for age, gender, race, comorbidities, type of procedure, and atherosclerosis severity showed noncilostazol users were more likely to undergo amputation ≤1 year after surgery (hazard ratio [HR], 1.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.29; P = .02). Subgroup analyses using Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for age, gender, and comorbidities demonstrated significantly improved 1-year amputation-free survival for patients with renal failure (HR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.28-2.02; P < .001) and diabetes (HR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.36-1.92; P < .001) who were taking cilostazol. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing LER, cilostazol use was associated with improved 1-year freedom from amputation. Patients with renal failure and diabetes also demonstrated a significant benefit from taking cilostazol. Further studies are needed to evaluate the benefits of cilostazol after LER.


Asunto(s)
Amputación Quirúrgica , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Extremidad Inferior/irrigación sanguínea , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/terapia , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Tetrazoles/uso terapéutico , Vasodilatadores/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Cilostazol , Comorbilidad , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Recuperación del Miembro , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Medicare , Análisis Multivariante , Oportunidad Relativa , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/mortalidad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
12.
Vascular ; 23(4): 344-9, 2015 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25315791

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the utilization of preoperative statins and their impact on perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing open or endovascular aortic repair. METHODS: Patients ≥50 years of age with non-ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair were identified in MedPAR files 2007-2008 utilizing ICD-9-CM codes. Preoperative statins use was identified using National Drug Codes in Part D. Chi-square test, multivariable logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression modeling were performed. RESULTS: In all, 19,323 patients were identified undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (14,602 endovascular aortic repair and 4721 open aortic repair); 9913 (50.3%) used statins before surgery. Bivariate analysis demonstrated lower rates of hospital, 30-, 90-day and 1-year mortality in patients with statins compared to those without statins after endovascular aortic repair (1.0% vs. 1.45%, p = 0.01; 1.51% vs. 2.3%, p = 0.0004; 3.05% vs. 4.66%, p < 0.0001; 7.91% vs. 11.56%, p < 0.0001, respectively). Multivariable logistic regression adjusting for age, gender, race, comorbidities and procedure demonstrated preoperative statins use was associated with a mortality reduction at 90-days postoperatively (odds ratio = 0.80; 95% CI 0.70-0.91, p = 0.0014) and 1-year postoperatively (odds ratio = 0.76; 95% CI 0.69-0.84, p = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Only half of the patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm repair were prescribed preoperative statins. After adjustment, statins were significantly associated with improved survival during 1 year after surgery and a decreased incidence of lower extremity embolic complications after endovascular aortic repair. These data support a beneficial role of statin use prior to surgery for patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Further prospective studies are needed to assess the benefit of statins in the perioperative period after 365 days.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/uso terapéutico , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/mortalidad , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Medicare Part D , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Factores Protectores , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/mortalidad
13.
Prog Transplant ; 25(1): 70-6, 2015 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25758804

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Kidney Transplant Morbidity Index (KTMI) is a novel prognostic morbidity index to help determine the impact that pretransplant comorbid conditions have on transplant outcome. OBJECTIVE: To use national data to validate the KTMI. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of the Organ Procurement and Transplant Network/United Network for Organ Sharing database. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: The study sample consisted of 100 261 adult patients who received a kidney transplant between 2000 and 2008. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to demonstrate 3-year graft and patient survival for each KTMI score. Cox proportional hazards regression models were created to determine hazards for 3-year graft failure and patient mortality for each KTMI score. RESULTS: A sequential decrease in graft survival (0 = 91.2%, 1 = 88.2%, 2 = 85.4%, 3 = 81.7%, 4 = 77.8%, 5 = 74.0%, 6 = 69.8%, and ≥ 7 = 68.7) and patient survival (0 = 98.2%, 1 = 96.6%, 2 = 93.7%, 3 = 89.7%, 4 = 84.8%, 5 = 80.8%, 6 = 76.0%, and ≥ 7 = 74.7%) is seen as KTMI scores increase. The differences in graft and patient survival between KTMI scores are all significant (P< .001) except between 6 and ≥ 7. Multivariate regression analysis reveals that KTMI is an independent predictor of higher graft failure and patient mortality rates and that risk increases as KTMI scores increase. CONCLUSION: The KTMI strongly predicts graft and patient survival by using pretransplant comorbid conditions; therefore, this easy-to-use tool can aid in determining outcome risk and transplant candidacy before listing, particularly in candidates with multiple comorbid conditions.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón , Morbilidad , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Rechazo de Injerto , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Riesgo , Medición de Riesgo
14.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 28(4): 823-30, 2014 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24491447

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that infectious complications after open surgery (OPEN) and endovascular repair (EVAR) of nonruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) negatively affected long-term outcomes. METHODS: Elective OPEN and EVAR cases were selected from 2005-2007 Medicare databases, and rates of postoperative infection, readmission, and longitudinal mortality were compared. RESULTS: Forty thousand eight hundred ninety-two EVARs and 16,669 OPEN AAA repairs were evaluated. Patients with OPEN developed infection during and after the index hospitalization (12.8% and 4.9%, respectively) more often than those who had undergone EVAR (3.2% and 3.9%, respectively; P < 0.0001 for both). Patients with hospital-acquired infection compared to noninfectious ones were more likely to die during the index hospitalization (odds ratio [OR]: 3.7 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 3.22-4.30]) and within 30 days after discharge (OR: 3.6 [95% CI: 2.83-4.45]). They also were more likely to be readmitted to the hospital during 30 days after index discharge (OR: 1.8 [95% CI: 1.63-1.94]). Index infections associated with the greatest readmission were urinary tract infection after OPEN and sepsis after EVAR. Hospital-acquired infection significantly increased the duration of hospital stay (14.2 ± 13.2 vs 4.0 ± 4.4 days; P < 0.0001) and total hospital charges ($133,070 ± $136,100 vs $66,359 ± $45,186; P < 0.0001). The most common infections to develop 30 days after initial discharge were surgical site infection after EVAR (1.27%) and urinary tract infection after OPEN (1.38%). CONCLUSION: Hospital-acquired infections had a dramatic effect by increasing hospital and 30-day mortality, readmission rates, and hospital resource use after AAA repair. Programs minimizing infectious complications may decrease future readmissions and mortality after AAA repair.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Infección Hospitalaria/etiología , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Sepsis/etiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/etiología , Infecciones Urinarias/etiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/economía , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/mortalidad , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/economía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/mortalidad , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Infección Hospitalaria/economía , Infección Hospitalaria/mortalidad , Infección Hospitalaria/terapia , Bases de Datos Factuales , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/economía , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Femenino , Precios de Hospital , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Medicare , Análisis Multivariante , Oportunidad Relativa , Alta del Paciente , Readmisión del Paciente , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Sepsis/economía , Sepsis/mortalidad , Sepsis/terapia , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/economía , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/mortalidad , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/terapia , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos , Infecciones Urinarias/economía , Infecciones Urinarias/mortalidad , Infecciones Urinarias/terapia
15.
Can J Urol ; 21(6): 7520-7, 2014 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25483757

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: To investigate the trends in the performance of radical cystectomy (RC) versus partial cystectomy (PC) in the United States over the past 10 years and compare postoperative outcomes between two procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The data was captured from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) 2001-2010 using the appropriate ICD-9-CM diagnosis and procedure codes. Patient sociodemographics, comorbidities and in-hospital complications after PC and RC were compared, taking into account some hospital characteristics. A chi-square analysis including a Cochran-Armitage trend test and a multivariable logistic regression analysis were employed. RESULTS: RC rate increased from 84.8% in 2001 to 90.3% in 2010, while PC decreased from 15.2% to 9.7% (p < 0.0001). PC patients were older than their RC counterparts (72.1 ± 11.3 versus 68.6 ± 10.1 years; p < 0.0001), had higher prevalence of major comorbidities, but decreased rate of postoperative complications overall (21.3% versus 38.6%; p < 0.001). The greatest rates of PC utilization were found in the Northeast and South (12.8% and 12.7%). The frequency of PC was 18.9% in non-teaching hospitals compared to 9.0% in teaching hospitals (p < 0.0001). In multivariate analysis, females, octogenarians, patients with hypertension and obesity, and patients in non-teaching and rural hospitals were more likely to receive PC. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the potential advantages in cancer control offered by RC, PC is being performed more frequently on the elderly, female patients, patients with hypertension and obesity, in non-teaching and rural hospitals, and in certain United States geographic regions, which can be partially explained by disparities in access to high volume cancer centers.


Asunto(s)
Cistectomía/métodos , Cistectomía/tendencias , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/cirugía , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Comorbilidad , Cistectomía/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores Sexuales , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
16.
J Ren Nutr ; 24(1): 50-7, 2014 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24070588

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Obesity is often an absolute contraindication to kidney transplant, but an internal analysis of our center's recipients suggests that not all obese populations exhibit poor outcomes. We used national data to compare outcomes in select groups of morbidly obese and normal-weight recipients after kidney transplant. DESIGN: This study was a retrospective analysis of the Organ Procurement and Transplant Network/United Network for Organ Sharing database. SUBJECTS: The study sample consisted of 30,132 morbidly obese (body mass index [BMI] 35-40 kg/m(2)) and normal-weight (BMI 18.5-24.9 kg/m(2)) patients who underwent primary kidney-only transplantation between 2001 and 2006. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Crude 3-year graft and patient survival rates of morbidly obese and normal-weight subgroups were evaluated. Logistic regression modeling compared 3-year graft failure and patient mortality in morbidly obese and normal-weight subgroups with opposite characteristics. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were created for 3-year graft and patient survival. Cox proportional hazard regression modeling was used to determine hazards for patient and graft mortality. RESULTS: No differences in crude graft and patient survival rates were seen between normal weight and morbidly obese recipients who were African American, diabetic, and 50 to 80 years of age. Morbidly obese recipients who were nondialysis dependent, nondiabetic, had good functional status, and received living-donor transplants had significantly lower 3-year graft failure and patient mortality risk compared with normal-weight recipients who were dialysis dependent, diabetic, had poor functional status, and received a deceased-donor transplant, respectively (P < .01). Morbidly obese recipients have significantly lower graft and patient survival curves compared with normal-weight recipients; however, multivariate regression analysis reveals that morbid obesity is not an independent predictor of graft failure or patient mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Morbid obesity is not independently associated with graft failure or patient mortality; therefore, it should not be used as a contraindication to kidney transplantation.


Asunto(s)
Rechazo de Injerto/mortalidad , Trasplante de Riñón/mortalidad , Obesidad Mórbida/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Índice de Masa Corporal , Contraindicaciones , Femenino , Supervivencia de Injerto , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Fallo Renal Crónico/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
17.
J Ren Nutr ; 24(6): 411-6, 2014 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25091137

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Obesity is often associated with higher hospital costs because of longer length of stay (LOS) but this has not been well studied in the kidney transplant population. Therefore, we used national data to compare LOS in select groups of morbidly obese and normal weight recipients after kidney transplant. DESIGN: This study was a retrospective analysis of the Organ Procurement and Transplant Network/United Network for Organ Sharing database. SUBJECTS: The study sample consisted of 42,787 morbidly obese (body mass index 35-40 kg/m(2)) and normal weight (body mass index 18.5-24.9 kg/m(2)) who underwent primary kidney-only transplantation between 2000 and 2008. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Morbidly obese and normal-weight subgroups were crudely evaluated for prolonged LOS (>7 days). Logistic regression modeling compared LOS in morbidly obese and normal-weight subgroups with varying characteristics and determined predictors of prolonged LOS. RESULTS: All morbidly obese subgroups had significantly higher crude rates of prolonged LOS (P < .05). However, no significant differences in prolonged LOS were seen between any of the morbidly obese or normal-weight subgroups in multivariate analysis. Morbid obesity was an independent predictor of prolonged LOS (P < .001) but not a stronger predictor than that of being African American, having coronary artery disease, diabetes mellitus, or peripheral vascular disease, being 50 to 80 years of age, having a previous transplant or poor functional status. Receiving a deceased-donor transplant and being dialysis dependent >4 years were significantly better predictors of prolonged LOS compared with morbid obesity (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Some morbidly obese populations have LOS rates that are not significantly different than many commonly transplanted normal weight populations, and the impact morbid obesity has on LOS is not different than many other factors often seen in kidney transplant recipients; therefore, morbid obesity alone should not be a financial consideration in kidney transplant.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón , Tiempo de Internación , Obesidad Mórbida/epidemiología , Obesidad Mórbida/terapia , Receptores de Trasplantes , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Índice de Masa Corporal , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto Joven
18.
Crit Care Med ; 40(10): 2754-9, 2012 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22824939

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Prior studies have shown that implementation of the Leapfrog intensive care unit physician staffing standard of dedicated intensivists providing 24-hr intensive care unit coverage reduces length of stay and in-hospital mortality. A theoretical model of the cost-effectiveness of intensive care unit physician staffing patterns has also been published, but no study has examined the actual cost vs. cost savings of such a program. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether improved outcomes in specific quality measures would result in an overall cost savings in patient care DESIGN: Retrospective, 1 yr before-after cohort study SETTING: A 15-bed mixed medical-surgical community intensive care unit PATIENTS: A total of 2,181 patients: 1,113 patients preimplementation and 1,068 patients postimplementation. INTERVENTION: Leapfrog intensive care unit physician staffing standard MEASUREMENTS: Intensive care unit and hospital length of stay, rates for ventilator-associated pneumonia and central venous access device infection, and cost of care. RESULTS: Following institution of the intensive care unit physician staffing, the mean intensive care unit length of stay decreased significantly from 3.5±8.9 days to 2.7±4.7 days, (p<.002). The frequency of ventilator-associated pneumonia fell from 8.1% to 1.3% (p<.0002) after intervention. Ventilator-associated pneumonia rate per 100 ventilator days decreased from 1.03 to 0.38 (p<.0002). After intervention, the frequency of the central venous access device infection events fell from 9.4% to 1.1% (p<.0002). Central venous access device infection rate per 1000 line days decreased from 8.49 to 1.69. The net savings for the hospital were $744,001. The 1-yr institutional return on investment from intensive care unit physician staffing was 105%. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of the Leapfrog intensive care unit physician staffing standard significantly reduced intensive care unit length of stay and lowered the prevalence of ventilator-associated pneumonia and central venous access device infection. A cost analysis yielded a 1-yr institutional return on investment of 105%. Our study confirms that implementation of the Leapfrog intensive care unit physician staffing model in the community hospital setting improves quality measures and is economically feasible.


Asunto(s)
Ahorro de Costo/métodos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/organización & administración , Admisión y Programación de Personal/organización & administración , Médicos/organización & administración , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/organización & administración , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/economía , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/prevención & control , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Hospitales con 300 a 499 Camas , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Hospitales Comunitarios/organización & administración , Hospitales de Enseñanza/organización & administración , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/economía , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/economía , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/prevención & control , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos
19.
J Vasc Surg ; 54(3): 706-13, 2011 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21636238

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Improving patient safety has become a national priority. Patient safety indicators (PSIs) are validated tools to identify potentially preventable adverse events. No studies currently exist for evaluating lower extremity (LE) vascular procedures and the occurrence of PSIs. METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample (2003-2007) was queried for elective LE angioplasty (endo) and bypass (open). PSIs appropriate to surgery were analyzed by χ(2) and logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: A total of 226,501 LE interventions (104,491 endo; 122,010 open) were evaluated. The rate of developing any PSI was 7.74% (open) and 8.51% (endo), P < .0001. In the latter group, PSI9 (postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma) with the rate 4.74% was a predominant indicator that was associated with an almost three times greater likelihood of death in this group. PSI predictors included advanced age (odds ratio [OR], 1.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.55-1.75 for oldest vs youngest patients), females (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.13-1.22), blacks (OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.04-1.17), congestive heart failure (OR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.72-1.96), diabetes mellitus (OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.12-1.28), renal failure (OR, 2.31; 95% CI, 2.14-2.50), hospital teaching status (OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.17-1.26), and larger hospitals (OR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.05-1.17). PSI occurrence was associated with increased cost ($28,387 vs $13,278; P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular procedures were found to have lower mortality rates overall, but were found to have a greater number of safety events occur primarily due to bleeding complications in women and the elderly. PSIs were associated with advanced age, black race, and comorbidities. Adverse events added significant cost, occurred more frequently in teaching and large hospitals, and future organizational analysis may improve safety and reduce cost.


Asunto(s)
Angioplastia/efectos adversos , Hospitales , Extremidad Inferior/irrigación sanguínea , Enfermedades Vasculares Periféricas/terapia , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Negro o Afroamericano , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Angioplastia/economía , Angioplastia/mortalidad , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Comorbilidad , Bases de Datos como Asunto , Femenino , Hematoma/etiología , Hematoma/prevención & control , Costos de Hospital , Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales de Enseñanza , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Enfermedades Vasculares Periféricas/economía , Enfermedades Vasculares Periféricas/mortalidad , Enfermedades Vasculares Periféricas/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/economía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/etiología , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/prevención & control , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/economía , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud/economía , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/economía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/mortalidad , Adulto Joven
20.
J Vasc Surg ; 54(1): 109-15, 2011 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21397441

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Catheter-based revascularization has emerged as an alternative to surgical bypass for the tibioperoneal vessels. The purpose of this analysis was to describe the outcomes of tibial angioplasty interventions for critical limb ischemia (CLI) in the hospitalized Medicare population, to examine in-hospital complications, to define the 30-day readmission and mortality rates, and to assess secondary procedures performed in this population. METHODS: In-patients with CLI undergoing tibioperoneal angioplasty were identified using The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services in-patient claims for 2005 to 2007. In-hospital complications, mortality, 30-day secondary procedures, and 30-day rehospitalization after discharge were described. RESULTS: A total of 13,258 in-patients underwent tibioperoneal angioplasty (54.2% men; 75.7% white, 17.1% African American; 42.8% gangrene, 46.7% rest pain, 10.5% claudication) and 29.3% had a stent, 47.3% had femoral-popliteal angioplasty, and 20.1% had atherectomy during their initial procedure. Initial hospital complications included renal complications (8.1%), respiratory complications and pneumonia (5.1%), and cardiac complications with acute myocardial infarction (3.2%). Mortality in-hospital was 2.8% and at 30 days was 6.7%. Thirty-day rehospitalization rate was 29.6%. Thirty-day reinterventions included repeat angiogram (8.5%), repeat tibioperoneal angioplasty (3.2%), open bypass (2.1%), and lower extremity amputations (23.8%). Gangrene was the most frequent diagnosis at rehospitalization (13.5%). Patients with gangrene as an indication for tibioperoneal angioplasty were 1.8 times (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.56-2.10) as likely as patients with rest pain to be rehospitalized during 30 days after discharge. Among comorbidities, predictors of 30-day rehospitalization included chronic renal failure (odds ratio [OR], 1.4; 95% CI, 1.27-1.52), chronic pulmonary disease (OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 1.01-1.25), and congestive heart failure (CHF; OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 1.01-1.22). About one-quarter of patients (23.8%) within 30 days after their initial procedure underwent amputation at any level of the lower limb. CONCLUSION: Tibioperoneal angioplasty is associated with frequent in-hospital complications, an overall 30-day amputation rate of 23.8% for all procedures and indications, and a 30-day rehospitalization rate of almost 30%. Further detailed analysis of tibioperoneal intervention is essential to define best treatment strategies and to minimize complications and readmission rates.


Asunto(s)
Angioplastia , Isquemia/terapia , Extremidad Inferior/irrigación sanguínea , Medicare , Arterias Tibiales , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Amputación Quirúrgica , Angioplastia/efectos adversos , Angioplastia/instrumentación , Angioplastia/mortalidad , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Enfermedad Crítica , Femenino , Humanos , Isquemia/mortalidad , Isquemia/cirugía , Recuperación del Miembro , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Oportunidad Relativa , Readmisión del Paciente , Retratamiento , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Stents , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA