The ECHELON-2 Trial: 5-year results of a randomized, phase III study of brentuximab vedotin with chemotherapy for CD30-positive peripheral T-cell lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: For patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL), outcomes using frontline treatment with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) or CHOP-like therapy are typically poor. The ECHELON-2 study demonstrated that brentuximab vedotin plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone (A+CHP) exhibited statistically superior progression-free survival (PFS) per independent central review and improvements in overall survival versus CHOP for the frontline treatment of patients with systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma or other CD30-positive PTCL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: ECHELON-2 is a double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, placebo-controlled, active-comparator phase III study. We present an exploratory update of the ECHELON-2 study, including an analysis of 5-year PFS per investigator in the intent-to-treat analysis group. RESULTS: A total of 452 patients were randomized (1 : 1) to six or eight cycles of A+CHP (N = 226) or CHOP (N = 226). At median follow-up of 47.6 months, 5-year PFS rates were 51.4% [95% confidence interval (CI): 42.8% to 59.4%] with A+CHP versus 43.0% (95% CI: 35.8% to 50.0%) with CHOP (hazard ratio = 0.70; 95% CI: 0.53-0.91), and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 70.1% (95% CI: 63.3% to 75.9%) with A+CHP versus 61.0% (95% CI: 54.0% to 67.3%) with CHOP (hazard ratio = 0.72; 95% CI: 0.53-0.99). Both PFS and OS were generally consistent across key subgroups. Peripheral neuropathy was resolved or improved in 72% (84/117) of patients in the A+CHP arm and 78% (97/124) in the CHOP arm. Among patients who relapsed and subsequently received brentuximab vedotin, the objective response rate was 59% with brentuximab vedotin retreatment after A+CHP and 50% with subsequent brentuximab vedotin after CHOP. CONCLUSIONS: In this 5-year update of ECHELON-2, frontline treatment of patients with PTCL with A+CHP continues to provide clinically meaningful improvement in PFS and OS versus CHOP, with a manageable safety profile, including continued resolution or improvement of peripheral neuropathy.

Brentuximab vedotin and ESHAP is highly effective as second-line therapy for Hodgkin lymphoma patients (long-term results of a trial by the Spanish GELTAMO Group).

BACKGROUND: In this work, we assessed the efficacy and safety of brentuximab vedotin (BV) plus ESHAP (BRESHAP) as second-line therapy for Relapsed/Refractory Hodgkin lymphoma (RRHL) to improve the results before autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a multicenter, open-label, phase I-II trial of patients with RRHL after first-line chemotherapy. Treatment had three 21-day cycles of etoposide, solumedrol, high-dose AraC, and cisplatin. BV was administered at three dose levels (0.9, 1.2, and 1.8 mg/kg) intravenous on day ‒1 to 3 + 3 cohorts of patients. Final BV dose was 1.8 mg/kg. Responding patients proceeded to ASCT, followed by three BV courses (1.8 mg/kg, every 21 days). Main end points for evaluation were maximum tolerable dose and overall and complete response (CR) before ASCT. RESULTS: A total of 66 patients were recruited (median age 36 years; range 18-66): 40 were primary refractory, 16 early relapse and 10 late relapse. There were 39 severe adverse events were reported in 22 patients, most frequently fever (n = 25, 35% neutropenic), including 3 deaths. Grade 3-4 hematological toxicity presented in 28 cases: neutropenia (n = 21), thrombocytopenia (n = 14), and anemia (n = 7). Grade ≥3-4 extrahematological adverse events (≥5%) were non-neutropenic fever (n = 13) and hypomagnesaemia (n = 3). Sixty-four patients underwent stem-cell mobilization; all collected >2×10e6/kg CD34+ cells (median 5.75; range 2.12-33.4). Overall response before transplant was 91% (CI 84% to 98%), including 70% (CRs 95% CI 59% to 81%). 60 patients were transplanted with no failure engraftments. Post-transplant response was CR in 49 patients (82% CI 73% to 91%) and partial responses in six (10% CI 5% to 15%). After a mean follow-up of 27 months, the 30-month time to treatment to failure was 74% (95% CI 68% to 80%), progression-free survival 71% (95% CI 65% to 77%), and overall survival 91% (CI 84% to 98%). CONCLUSION: BRESHAP looks a safe and effective pre-transplant induction regimen, does not jeopardize transplant and allows long-term remissions and survival.

Comorbidities, not age, are predictive of survival after autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation for relapsed/refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma in patients older than 50 years.

Autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT) is the standard of care for young patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL). However, there is limited experience of its efficacy and feasibility in older patients. The characteristics and outcomes of 121 patients aged ≥50 years (42 of them are ≥60 years old) with R/R HL who underwent AHCT were reviewed. After a median follow-up of 3.1 years, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) at 5 years were 64 and 55 %, respectively, with no differences between 50-59-year-old and ≥60-year-old patients. Hematological and extra-hematological toxicities after AHCT were comparable between the two groups of age. In univariate analysis, poorer OS and PFS were associated with disease status other than complete remission, hematopoietic cell transplantation comorbidity index (HCT-CI) scores >1, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) scores >1. HCT-CI scores >1 were also associated with a higher risk of grade 3-4 extrahematologic toxicity. In multivariate analysis, HCT-CI and CCI remained significantly associated with OS and PFS after adjustment for disease status. Our data show that AHCT can be performed in selected patients with R/R HL ≥50 years with acceptable outcome and toxicity. Comorbidities appear to impact AHCT outcome more than age.

Prospective study of prognostic factors in asymptomatic patients with B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia-like lymphocytosis: the cut-off of 11 × 10(9)/L monoclonal lymphocytes better identifies subgroups with different outcomes.

The arbitrary threshold of 5 × 10(9)/L chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)-like lymphocytes differentiates monoclonal B lymphocytosis (MBL) from CLL. There are no prospective studies that search for the optimal cut-off of monoclonal lymphocytes able to predict outcome and simultaneously analyze the prognostic value of classic, immunophenotypic, and cytogenetic variables in patients with asymptomatic clonal CLL lymphocytosis (ACL), which includes MBL plus Rai 0 CLL patients. From 2003 to 2010, 231 ACL patients were enrolled in this study. Patients with 11q deletion and atypical lymphocyte morphology at diagnosis had shorter progression-free survival (PFS) (p = 0.007 and p = 0.015, respectively) and treatment-free survival (TFS) (p = 0.009 and p = 0.017, respectively). Elevated beta-2 microglobulin (B2M) also correlated with worse TFS (p = 0.002). The optimal threshold of monoclonal lymphocytes independently correlated with survival was 11 × 10(9)/L (p = 0.000 for PFS and p = 0.016 for TFS). As conclusion, monoclonal lymphocytosis higher than 11 × 10(9)/L better identifies two subgroups of patients with different outcomes than the standard cut-off value of 5 × 10(9)/L. Atypical lymphocyte morphology, 11q deletion and elevated B2M had a negative impact on the survival in ACL patients.

Bendamustine as salvage treatment for patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma patients: a retrospective study of the Spanish experience.

Patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) have an adverse outcome after relapse. Bendamustine has demonstrated a good efficacy and toxicity profile in previously reported trials. In this study, we present a retrospective analysis of the Spanish experience in relapsed/refractory MCL treated with bendamustine in combination or alone with the objective of knowing the efficacy and toxicity profile of this treatment in our current clinical practice. Fifty eight patients were registered: 67 % male with median age of 71 years, and 2 is the median number of previous lines. The most frequent bendamustine regimen was bendamustine plus rituximab (83 %). The median number of cycles was 5 (range 1-8). The overall response rate was 84 % with 53 % of complete response/unconfirmed complete response (CR/uCR). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 16 months (95 % confidence interval (CI) 13.3-18.8), and for patients who achieved CR/uCR, it was 33 months (95 % CI 11.1-54.2). Median overall survival (OS) was 30 months (95 % CI 25.6-34.9). For PFS, only blastoid histology and not achieving CR after bendamustine had a significant negative impact on the univariate and multivariate analyses (p < 0.05). Nevertheless, for OS, only an elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) had negative impact on both, univariate and multivariate analyses (p < 0.05). Only one case of treatment-related mortality in a 79-year-old patient with very bad performance status was reported. In 280 cycles, 12 (4 %) hospitalizations for febrile neutropenia were reported. In our population, bendamustine has been a good salvage treatment with a favorable toxicity profile in a non selected and heavily pretreated population of patients with MCL.

A real-life overview of a hematopoietic cell transplant program throughout a four-year period, including prospective registry, exclusion causes and final donor selection.

Traceability of patients who are candidates for Hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) is crucial to ensure HCT program quality. Continuous knowledge of both a detailed registry from a HCT program and final exclusion causes can contribute to promoting a real-life vision and optimizing patient and donor selection. We analyzed epidemiological data reported in a 4 year-monocentric prospective registry, which included all patients presented as candidates for autologous (Auto) and/or allogeneic (Allo) HCT. A total of 543 patients were considered for HCT: 252 (42.4%) for Allo and 291 (57.6%) for Auto. A total of 98 (38.9%) patients were excluded from AlloHCT due to basal disease progression more commonly (18.2%). Seventy-six (30.2%) patients had an HLA identical sibling, whereas 147 (58.3%) patients had only Haplo. UD research was performed in 106 (42%) cases, significantly more often in myeloid than lymphoid malignancies (57% vs 28.7%, p < 0.001) but 61.3% were finally canceled, due to donor or disease causes in 72.4%. With respect to Auto candidates, a total of 60 (20.6%) patients were finally excluded; progression was the most common cause (12%). Currently, Haplo is the most frequent donor type. The high cancellation rate of UD research should be revised to optimize further donor algorithms.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for advanced mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome. An updated experience of the Lymphoma Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is a potentially curative treatment option in advanced-stage mycosis fungoides (MF) and Sézary syndrome (SS). This study presents an updated analysis of the initial experience of the Lymphoma Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) describing the outcomes after allo-HSCT for MF and SS, with special emphasis on the impact of the use of unrelated donors (URD). METHODS AND PATIENTS: Eligible for this study were patients with advanced-stage MF or SS who underwent a first allo-HSCT from matched HLA-identical related or URD between January/1997 and December/2011. Sixty patients have been previously reported. RESULTS: 113 patients were included [77 MF (68%)]; 61 (54%) were in complete or partial remission, 86 (76%) received reduced-intensity protocols and 44 (39%) an URD allo-HSCT. With a median follow up for surviving patients of 73 months, allo-HSCT resulted in an estimated overall survival (OS) of 38% at 5 years, and a progression-free survival (PFS) of 26% at 5 years. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that advanced-phase disease (complete remission/partial remission >3, primary refractory or relapse/progression in patients that had received 3 or more lines of systemic treatment prior to transplant or the number of treatment lines was not known), a short interval between diagnosis and transplant (<18 months) were independent adverse prognostic factors for PFS; advanced-phase disease and the use of URDs were independent adverse prognostic factors for OS. CONCLUSIONS: This extended series supports that allo-HSCT is able to effectively rescue over one third of the population of patients with advanced-stage MF/SS. High relapse rate is still the major cause of failure and needs to be improved with better strategies before and after transplant. The negative impact of URD is a matter of concern and needs to be further elucidated in future studies.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for patients with relapsed/refractory systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma. A retrospective analysis of the Lymphoma Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

Information regarding the curative role of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT) in systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma (sALCL) is scarce. We analyzed the results of allo-HCT in patients with relapsed/refractory sALCL with special emphasis on the role of brentuximab vedotin (BV) as a bridge to allo-HCT. Forty-four patients (24 females, median age 38 years) with sALCL were included. Twenty-three patients (52%) received BV before allo-HCT; BV-treated patients were more heavily pretreated (≥3 lines of therapy in 74% vs. 38%, p = 0.04). Twenty-three patients (52%) were in complete remission (CR) at allo-HCT. Three-year nonrelapse mortality and incidence of relapse (IR) after allo-HCT were 7% and 40%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 39 (12-69) months for survivors, 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were 53% and 74%, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that heavily pretreated patients and those not in CR had a higher IR and a lower PFS. The use of BV before transplant did not impact on any of the outcomes. Allo-HCT is a curative therapeutic strategy in a significant proportion of patients with relapsed/refractory sALCL; BV does not seem to modify transplant-related outcomes but might be able to render more patients candidates for this curative treatment.

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for relapsed/refractory systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma. A retrospective analysis of the lymphoma working party (LWP) of the EBMT.

Systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma (sALCL) is a rare histological entity expressing the CD30 antigen that comprises around 11% of peripheral T-cell lymphoma. We analysed the outcome of patients with relapsed/refractory sALCL treated with autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-HCT). We included 65 adult patients (42 males; median age, 44 years); 24 patients had an ALK-ve sALCL. Fifty-one patients had chemosensitive disease at the time of transplant. Ten patients (15%) were treated with brentuximab vedotin (BV) before auto-HCT (median number of doses: 5). The median follow-up for surviving patients was 35 months (3-71). Three-year cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality and of relapse were 1.7% and 34%, respectively. Three-year progression-free survival and overall survival were 64% and 73%, respectively. No prognostic factors for any of the outcomes analysed were found in univariate analysis. There were no significant differences in any of the outcomes between patients who had received BV and the remainder. This is the largest analysis presented so far analysing the role of auto-HCT in patients with relapsed/refractory sALCL, showing a promising PFS and OS in this high-risk population. The potential impact of the administration of BV as salvage strategy before the procedure needs to be further elucidated.

Rheumatic immune-related adverse events in patients on anti-PD-1 inhibitors: Fasciitis with myositis syndrome as a new complication of immunotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence and type of rheumatic immune-related adverse events (IRAEs) in patients receiving programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitors. METHODS: This is a single-center prospective observational study, including all cancer patients receiving PD-1 inhibitors between January 2016 and January 2018. RESULTS: During the period analyzed, we evaluated a total of 11 patients. No patient had pre-existing rheumatic or autoimmune disease. In this period, a total of 220 patients were treated with PD1 inhibitors in our center; therefore, the estimated minimum prevalence of rheumatic IRAEs related to these therapies in our population was 5%. The rheumatic IRAEs evaluated included 5 cases of oligo- or polyarthritis, 1 with a polymialgia rheumatica-type syndrome, 2 cases of immunotherapy-induced sicca syndrome, 2 patients who presented symptomatic inflammatory myositis with fasciitis in lower extremities, and 1 patient with a paraneoplastic acral vascular syndrome. The median time to IRAE after anti-PD1 exposure was 8 weeks (range: 2-24). In 5 patients, immunotherapy was discontinued (due to the adverse effect in three and cancer progression in two). In general terms the symptoms resolved completely with symptomatic treatment. Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs were needed for 2 patients. CONCLUSION: Rheumatic IRAEs should be kept in mind during the follow-up and evaluation of patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors. The concomitant development of symptomatic inflammatory myositis with fasciitis in lower extremities appears to be a new adverse effect of anti-PD-1 immunotherapy. Additional studies are needed to determine how to adequately control and manage these complications.

Factors influencing mortality in neutropenic patients with haematologic malignancies or solid tumours with bloodstream infection.

The purpose of this study was to identify factors influencing mortality in neutropenic patients with haematologic malignancies or solid tumours with bloodstream infection (BSI). All episodes of BSI occurring in adult neutropenic patients with haematologic malignancies or solid tumours were prospectively recorded from January 2006 to December 2013. We analysed the factors influencing mortality in both groups of patients. We documented 602 consecutive episodes of BSI; 510 occurred in patients with haematologic malignancies and 92 in patients with solid tumours. The overall case-fatality rates were 12% and 36%, respectively. Independent risk factors associated with a higher case-fatality rate in patients with haematologic malignancies were: intensive care unit admission (odds ratio (OR), 15.2; 95% confidence interval (CI), 5.4-42.7), advanced neoplasm (OR, 8.7; 95% CI, 2.9-25.7), corticosteroid therapy (OR, 7.0; 95% CI, 3-16.4), multidrug-resistant Gram-negative BSI (OR, 3.8; 95% CI, 1.2-11.8) and a Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer risk score of <21 (OR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.3-7.4). By contrast, coagulase-negative staphylococci BSI (OR, 0.04; 95% CI, 0.004-0.5) and empirical antibiotic combination therapy (OR, 0.1; 95% CI, 0.05-0.3) were found to be protective. Independent risk factors for overall case-fatality rate in patients with solid tumours were: shock at presentation (OR, 14.3; 95% CI, 3.2-63.8), corticosteroid therapy (OR, 10; 95% CI, 2.3-44) and advanced neoplasm (OR, 7.8; 95% CI, 1.4-41.4). Prognostic factors identified in this study may help to detect those patients at higher risk of death in each group. Medical intervention addressing some of these factors might improve the outcome of BSI in neutropenic patients with haematologic malignancies or solid tumours.

Changing aetiology, clinical features, antimicrobial resistance, and outcomes of bloodstream infection in neutropenic cancer patients.

Recent changes in the management of patients with haematological malignancies might have influenced the aetiology, characteristics, antimicrobial resistance and outcomes of bloodstream infection (BSI) during neutropenia. We compared 272 episodes of BSI in adult neutropenic patients with cancer prospectively collected from January 1991 to December 1996 (first period), when quinolone prophylaxis was used, with 283 episodes recorded from January 2006 to March 2010 (second period), when antibacterial prophylaxis was stopped. Patients in the second period were significantly older and were more likely to have graft-versus-host disease and a urinary catheter in place, whereas the presence of a central venous catheter, parenteral nutrition, corticosteroids and antifungal and quinolone prophylaxis, were more frequent in the first period. More patients in the first period had mucositis and soft-tissue infection as the origin of BSI, but an endogenous source was more common during the second. Gram-positive BSI was more frequent in the first period (64% versus 41%; p <0.001), mainly due to coagulase-negative staphylococci and viridans group streptococci. In the second period gram-negative BSI increased (28% versus 49%; p <0.001), quinolone susceptibilities were recovered, but multidrug-resistant gram-negative BSI also increased (1% versus 6%; p <0.001). Although patients in the second period were more likely to need admission to the intensive-care unit, overall case-fatality rate was similar in the two periods (19% versus 15%). The aetiology of BSI in neutropenic patients with cancer has shifted from gram-positive to gram-negative organisms. Multidrug resistance among gram-negative bacilli is emerging as a therapeutic challenge. Overall case-fatality rate remains high.

Clinical Characteristics and Risk of Relapse for Patients with Stage I-II Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma Treated in First Line with Immunochemotherapy.

Diffuse large b-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is an aggressive and potentially curable lymphoma that presents itself as stage I-II in 30% of all cases. It is known that in these localized stages, 15-20% of patients treated without rituximab eventually relapse, but less data exist regarding rituximab era. We have analyzed clinico-pathological features and risk of relapse in 98 patients with I-II stage DLBCL in complete response (CR) or unconfirmed CR (CRu) after first-line treatment consisting of immunochemotherapy. Twelve patients (12.2%) eventually relapsed. Late relapse, more than two years after diagnosis, occurred in three patients, and early relapse, less than two years after diagnosis, was documented in nine patients. Median time from diagnosis to relapse was 0.61 years for patients with early relapse and 3.66 years for patients with late relapse. The second CR rate obtained was similar in the late and in early relapsing patients, being 33% versus 44% (p = 0.072), respectively. Three-year overall survival (OS) was 22% for early relapsing patients and 33% for late relapsing patients (p = 0.65). In conclusion, patients who are diagnosed with stage I-II DLBCL and achieve a CR/CRu with first line immunochemotherapy have a good prognosis. However, a proportion of patients relapse, and this is less frequent in patients treated with first line with immunochemotherapy. These patients have a poor prognosis.

Prognostic indexes in follicular lymphoma: a comparison of different prognostic systems.

BACKGROUND: The International Prognostic Index (IPI), initially designed for aggressive lymphomas, is also used in follicular lymphoma (FL) and other indolent lymphomas. Two new prognostic indexes have recently been proposed for FL [the Italian Lymphoma Intergroup (ILI) Index and the Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI)]. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three indexes, IPI [age >60 years, extranodal involvement two or more sites, elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status > or =2, stage > or =3], ILI (age >60 years, extranodal involvement two or more sites, elevated LDH, male sex, B symptoms, erythrocyte sedimentation rate > or =30 mm first hour) and FLIPI (age >60 years, stage > or =3, elevated LDH, nodal involvement five or more, haemoglobin level < or =12 g/dl) were calculated in 411 patients with FL. RESULTS: Overall concordance between the three indexes was 54%. A total of 126 (31%) patients were included in the high-risk group according to IPI, 131 (32%) according to ILI and 157 (38%) after FLIPI application. Ten-year overall survival rates after applying the prognostic indexes (IPI, ILI and FLIPI) were, respectively: 72%, 71% and 72%, in the low-risk group; 51%, 60% and 49% in the intermediate-risk group; and 24%, 16% and 31% in the high-risk group. CONCLUSIONS: In this series, all three indexes, IPI, ILI and FLIPI, were useful to classify FL patients into differentiated risk groups, although the FLIPI identified a larger proportion of high-risk patients than the IPI and ILI.

Post-transplant lymphomas: a 20-year epidemiologic, clinical and pathologic study in a single center.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To study the incidence, clinical presentation, pathologic features and outcome of post-transplant lymphomas (PTL) during the past 20 years. DESIGN AND METHODS: We undertook a descriptive study of all biopsy-proven cases of PTL diagnosed in our hospital from 1979 through 1999. The average annual incidence rate of PTL was analyzed at 5-year intervals from 1979 to 1999. Risk ratios were estimated by comparing the incidence of PTL among transplanted patients with that of lymphoma observed in the general population of the region. Survival analysis was performed at the univariate level using the Kaplan Meier technique and at the multivariate level by Cox hazard models. RESULTS: Seventeen of 1,860 transplanted patients developed a PTL (0.9%). The risk of PTL was calculated to be almost 8-fold higher than the risk of lymphoma in the general population. The risk was highest among those who had received a heart transplant (RR=35.6). The mean time between transplant and the diagnosis of PTL was 31 +/- 29 months. Of all PTL, 88% were of B-cell origin and 53% of the cases tested were Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-positive. The median survival was 24 months. The majority of patients with allograft involvement died within the 2 months following diagnosis (hazard ratio 5.3; 95% CI 1.4-20.7). INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: Organ transplantation is a major risk factor for the development of lymphoma, a disease with a particularly bad prognosis when it develops at the site of the allograft. Early diagnosis and more specific treatment may improve PTL survival.