Replication and virus-induced transcriptome of HAdV-5 in normal host cells versus cancer cells--differences of relevance for adenoviral oncolysis.

Adenoviruses (Ads), especially HAdV-5, have been genetically equipped with tumor-restricted replication potential to enable applications in oncolytic cancer therapy. Such oncolytic adenoviruses have been well tolerated in cancer patients, but their anti-tumor efficacy needs to be enhanced. In this regard, it should be considered that cancer cells, dependent on their tissue of origin, can differ substantially from the normal host cells to which Ads are adapted by complex virus-host interactions. Consequently, viral replication efficiency, a key determinant of oncolytic activity, might be suboptimal in cancer cells. Therefore, we have analyzed both the replication kinetics of HAdV-5 and the virus-induced transcriptome in human bronchial epithelial cells (HBEC) in comparison to cancer cells. This is the first report on genome-wide expression profiling of Ads in their native host cells. We found that E1A expression and onset of viral genome replication are most rapid in HBEC and considerably delayed in melanoma cells. In squamous cell lung carcinoma cells, we observed intermediate HAdV-5 replication kinetics. Infectious particle production, viral spread and lytic activity of HAdV-5 were attenuated in melanoma cells versus HBEC. Expression profiling at the onset of viral genome replication revealed that HAdV-5 induced the strongest changes in the cellular transcriptome in HBEC, followed by lung cancer and melanoma cells. We identified prominent regulation of genes involved in cell cycle and DNA metabolism, replication and packaging in HBEC, which is in accord with the necessity to induce S phase for viral replication. Strikingly, in melanoma cells HAdV-5 triggered opposing regulation of said genes and, in contrast to lung cancer cells, no weak S phase induction was detected when using the E2F promoter as reporter. Our results provide a rationale for improving oncolytic adenoviruses either by adaptation of viral infection to target tumor cells or by modulating tumor cell functions to better support viral replication.

Targeting cancer by transcriptional control in cancer gene therapy and viral oncolysis.

Cancer-specificity is the key requirement for a drug or treatment regimen to be effective against malignant disease--and has rarely been achieved adequately to date. Therefore, targeting strategies need to be implemented for future therapies to ensure efficient activity at the site of patients' tumors or metastases without causing intolerable side-effects. Gene therapy and viral oncolysis represent treatment modalities that offer unique opportunities for tumor targeting. This is because both the transfer of genes with anti-cancer activity and viral replication-induced cell killing, respectively, facilitate the incorporation of multiple mechanisms restricting their activity to cancer. To this end, cellular mechanisms of gene regulation have been successfully exploited to direct therapeutic gene expression and viral cell lysis to cancer cells. Here, transcriptional targeting has been the role model and most widely investigated. This approach exploits cellular gene regulatory elements that mediate cell type-specific transcription to restrict the expression of therapeutic genes or essential viral genes, ideally to cancer cells. In this review, we first discuss the rationale for such promoter targeting and its limitations. We then give an overview how tissue-/tumor-specific promoters are being identified and characterized. Strategies to apply and optimize such promoters for the engineering of targeted viral gene transfer vectors and oncolytic viruses-with respect to promoter size, selectivity and activity in the context of viral genomes-are described. Finally, we discuss in more detail individual examples for transcriptionally targeted virus drugs. First highlighting oncolytic viruses targeted by prostate-specific promoters and by the telomerase promoter as representatives of tissue-targeted and pan-cancer-specific virus drugs respectively, and secondly recent developments of the last two years.

Lymphatic tracing and T cell responses following oral vaccination with live Mycobacterium bovis (BCG).

Oral vaccination of mice with lipid-encapsulated Mycobacterium bovis bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) expands a subset of interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma)-secreting T cells and mediates protection against aerosol mycobacterial challenge. We have traced the movement of the live vaccine through the regional lymphatics of mice and monitored the resultant immune response. Six hours after oral vaccination BCG was detected in low numbers systemically and in draining lymphatic tissue. However, after 48 h, BCG was predominantly associated with alimentary tract lymphatic tissues, such as the cervical and mesenteric lymph nodes and Peyer's patches. Lymphocytes that produced IFN-gamma in response to PPD-B or BCG-pulsed dendritic cells predominated in the spleen and were almost exclusively CD4(+), CD44(+) and CD62L(-), thus resembling an effector memory T cell population. Despite the fact that an oral route was used for immunization, splenic IFN-gamma-secreting T cells in vaccinated mice did not express the mucosal homing antigens alpha(4)beta(7) integrin or alphaIEL (CD103). However, a proportion of BCG-specific CD4(+) T cells expressed the CD29 integrin (beta(1)) chain, potentially involved in lung homing function. Thus, oral priming with M. bovis BCG appears to induce a subset of spleen-resident CD4(+) T cells with the potential to provide protective immunity in the lung.