RESUMEN
The lung microbiome plays an essential role in maintaining healthy lung function, including host immune homeostasis. Lung microbial dysbiosis or disruption of the gut-lung axis can contribute to lung carcinogenesis by causing DNA damage, inducing genomic instability, or altering the host's susceptibility to carcinogenic insults. Thus far, most studies have reported the association of microbial composition in lung cancer. Mechanistic studies describing host-microbe interactions in promoting lung carcinogenesis are limited. Considering cancer as a multifaceted disease where epigenetic dysregulation plays a critical role, epigenetic modifying potentials of microbial metabolites and toxins and their roles in lung tumorigenesis are not well studied. The current review explains microbial dysbiosis and epigenetic aberrations in lung cancer and potential therapeutic opportunities.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pulmonares , Microbiota , Humanos , Disbiosis/complicaciones , Disbiosis/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Transformación Celular Neoplásica , Epigénesis GenéticaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Larotrectinib, a first-in-class, highly selective tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) inhibitor, has demonstrated efficacy in adult and pediatric patients with various solid tumors harboring NTRK gene fusions. This subset analysis focuses on the efficacy and safety of larotrectinib in an expanded cohort of adult patients with TRK fusion sarcomas. METHODS: Patients (≥18 years old) with sarcomas harboring NTRK gene fusions were identified from three clinical trials. Patients received larotrectinib 100 mg orally twice daily. Response was investigator-assessed per RECIST v1.1. Data cutoff was July 20, 2021. RESULTS: At the data cutoff, 36 adult patients with TRK fusion sarcomas had initiated larotrectinib therapy: two (6%) patients had bone sarcomas, four (11%) had gastrointestinal stromal tumors, and 30 (83%) had soft tissue sarcomas. All patients were evaluable for response and demonstrated an objective response rate of 58% (95% confidence interval, 41-74). Patients responded well to larotrectinib regardless of number of prior lines of therapy. Adverse events (AEs) were mostly grade 1/2. Grade 3 treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) occurred in 15 (42%) patients. There were no grade 4 TEAEs. Two grade 5 TEAEs were reported, neither of which were considered related to larotrectinib. Four (11%) patients permanently discontinued treatment due to TEAEs. CONCLUSIONS: Larotrectinib demonstrated robust and durable responses, extended survival benefit, and a favorable safety profile in adult patients with TRK fusion sarcomas with longer follow-up. These results continue to demonstrate that testing for NTRK gene fusions should be incorporated into the clinical management of adult patients with various types of sarcomas. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) fusion proteins result from translocations involving the NTRK gene and cause cancer in a range of tumor types. Larotrectinib is an agent that specifically targets TRK fusion proteins and is approved for the treatment of patients with TRK fusion cancer. This study looked at how well larotrectinib worked in adult patients with sarcomas caused by TRK fusion proteins. Over half of patients had a durable response to larotrectinib, with no unexpected side effects. These results show that larotrectinib is safe and effective in adult patients with TRK fusion sarcomas.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Óseas , Neoplasias , Sarcoma , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos , Humanos , Niño , Adulto , Adolescente , Tropomiosina/genética , Tropomiosina/uso terapéutico , Sarcoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Sarcoma/genética , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Pirazoles/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/efectos adversos , Fusión Génica , Proteínas de Fusión Oncogénica/genética , Neoplasias Óseas/tratamiento farmacológico , Receptor trkA/genéticaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors may synergize with programmed cell death receptor-1 (PD-1) inhibitors to enhance adaptive and innate antitumor immune responses. In the phase 2 JASPER study (NCT04475939), the PARP inhibitor niraparib was evaluated in combination with the PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab in patients with metastatic and/or locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Patients whose tumors had programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion scores (TPS) ≥50% (cohort 1) or 1%-49% (cohort 2) received first-line niraparib (200 mg once daily) plus pembrolizumab (200 mg every 3 weeks). The primary end point was investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR). Secondary end points included duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), safety, and pharmacokinetics. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients were enrolled in cohorts 1 and 2. In cohort 1, ORR (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 56.3% (9 of 16 patients; 29.9%-80.2%); 2 of 16 patients had complete responses and 7 of 16 had partial responses (PRs). In cohort 2, ORR was 20.0% (5.7%-43.7%) with 4 of 20 PRs. In cohorts 1 and 2, the median DoR was 19.7 months (95% CI, 4.2 months to not estimable [NE]) and 9.4 months (95% CI, 4.2 months to NE), the median PFS was 8.4 months (95% CI, 3.9-22.1 months) and 4.2 months (95% CI, 2.0-6.2 months), and the median OS was NE (95% CI, 6.0 months to NE) and 7.7 months (95% CI, 4.0-12.5 months), respectively. Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 88.2% and 85.7% of patients in cohorts 1 and 2, respectively. Safety was consistent with known profiles of single-agent niraparib and pembrolizumab. CONCLUSIONS: Niraparib plus pembrolizumab showed clinical activity in patients with advanced and/or metastatic NSCLC. LAY SUMMARY: The JASPER clinical trial studied a new combination treatment for advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Pembrolizumab, a drug approved for NSCLC, was given with niraparib. Previous research showed that these 2 drugs together might work better than either drug alone. This study found that more than half of patients with high levels of a tumor marker responded to the combination, and one-fifth of patients with lower levels of the marker responded. The types of side effects from the combination were similar to side effects from both drugs alone. These results support more research on this combination.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Indazoles , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Piperidinas , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Humanos , Indazoles/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Piperidinas/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: RESILIENT (NCT03088813) is a phase 2/3 study assessing the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of liposomal irinotecan monotherapy in patients with small cell lung cancer and disease progression on/after first-line platinum-based therapy. Here, we present results from RESILIENT part 1. METHODS: This open-label, single-arm, safety run-in evaluation with dose-exploration and dose-expansion phases included patients ≥18 years old with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0/1; those with asymptomatic central nervous system metastases were eligible. The primary objectives were to evaluate safety and tolerability and recommend a dose for further development. Efficacy end points were objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: During dose exploration, 5 patients received intravenous liposomal irinotecan at 85 mg/m2 (deemed not tolerable; dose-limiting toxicity) and 12 patients received 70 mg/m2 (deemed tolerable). During dose expansion, 13 additional patients received intravenous liposomal irinotecan at 70 mg/m2 . Of these 25 patients (median age [range], 59.0 [48.0-73.0] years, 92.0% with metastatic disease), 10 experienced grade ≥3 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), most commonly diarrhea (20.0%) and neutropenia (16.0%), and 3 had serious treatment-related TEAEs, of whom 2 died. ORR was 44.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 24.40-65.07; 1 complete response, 10 partial responses) and median (95% CI) PFS and OS were 3.98 (1.45-4.24) months and 8.08 (5.16-9.82) months, respectively. CONCLUSION: Overall, no new safety signals were identified with liposomal irinotecan, and antitumor activity was promising. RESILIENT part 2, a randomized, controlled, phase 3 study of liposomal irinotecan versus topotecan, is ongoing. LAY SUMMARY: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive disease with few treatment options after platinum-based therapy. Administering 1 option, irinotecan, as a "liposomal" formulation, may extend drug exposure and improve outcomes. The RESILIENT part 1 trial assessed the safety and efficacy of liposomal irinotecan in 25 adults with SCLC after disease progression despite platinum-based therapy. No new safety concerns were reported. The most common moderate-to-severe side effects were diarrhea (20% of patients) and neutropenia (16%). Tumors responded to treatment in 44% of patients. Average survival was 8.08 months, and time to disease progression was 3.98 months. Liposomal irinotecan trials are ongoing.
Asunto(s)
Irinotecán , Liposomas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células Pequeñas , Anciano , Diarrea/etiología , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Humanos , Irinotecán/efectos adversos , Liposomas/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neutropenia/inducido químicamente , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células Pequeñas/patologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Activating fusions of the NTRK1, NTRK2 and NTRK3 genes are drivers of carcinogenesis and proliferation across a broad range of tumour types in both adult and paediatric patients. Recently, the FDA granted tumour-agnostic approvals of TRK inhibitors, larotrectinib and entrectinib, based on significant and durable responses in multiple primary tumour types. Unfortunately, testing rates in clinical practice remain quite low. Adding plasma next-generation sequencing of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) to tissue-based testing increases the detection rate of oncogenic drivers and demonstrates high concordance with tissue genotyping. However, the clinical potential of ctDNA analysis to identify NTRK fusion-positive tumours has been largely unexplored. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a ctDNA database in advanced stage solid tumours for NTRK1 fusions. RESULTS: NTRK1 fusion events, with nine unique fusion partners, were identified in 37 patients. Of the cases for which clinical data were available, 44% had tissue testing for NTRK1 fusions; the NTRK1 fusion detected by ctDNA was confirmed in tissue in 88% of cases. Here, we report for the first time that minimally-invasive plasma NGS can detect NTRK fusions with a high positive predictive value. CONCLUSION: Plasma ctDNA represents a rapid, non-invasive screening method for this rare genomic target that may improve identification of patients who can benefit from TRK-targeted therapy and potentially identify subsequent on- and off-target resistance mechanisms.
Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores de Tumor/sangre , ADN Tumoral Circulante/genética , Secuenciación de Nucleótidos de Alto Rendimiento/métodos , Neoplasias/patología , Proteínas de Fusión Oncogénica , Pirazoles/uso terapéutico , Pirimidinas/uso terapéutico , Receptor trkA/genética , Benzamidas/uso terapéutico , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , ADN Tumoral Circulante/sangre , Secuenciación de Nucleótidos de Alto Rendimiento/normas , Humanos , Indazoles/uso terapéutico , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias/sangre , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias/genética , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is characterised by high relapse rates. Tumour-initiating cells (TICs) are responsible for drug resistance and recurrence of cancer. Rovalpituzumab tesirine (Rova-T), a potent humanised antibody-drug conjugate, selectively targets delta-like protein 3, which is highly expressed in SCLC TICs. The experimental drug CBL0137 (CBL) inhibits the histone chaperone FACT (facilitates chromatin transcription), which is required for the expression of transcription factors that are essential for TIC maintenance. Rova-T and CBL each target SCLC TICs as single agents. However, acquired or intrinsic resistance to single agents is a major problem in cancer. Therefore, we investigated the potential effect of combining Rova-T and CBL in SCLC to eradicate TICs more effectively. Our preclinical studies report a novel and highly translatable therapeutic strategy of dual targeting TICs using Rova-T in combination with CBL to potentially increase survival of SCLC patients.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/farmacología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Animales , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Apoptosis , Benzodiazepinonas/administración & dosificación , Carbazoles/administración & dosificación , Proliferación Celular , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos , Humanos , Inmunoconjugados/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Ratones , Ratones Endogámicos NOD , Ratones SCID , Pronóstico , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células Pequeñas/patología , Células Tumorales Cultivadas , Ensayos Antitumor por Modelo de XenoinjertoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This is a first-in-human study with TAS-119, an Aurora A kinase (AurA) inhibitor. METHODS: Patients with advanced, refractory, solid tumours were enrolled into 5 dose escalation cohorts (70-300 mg BID, 4 days on/3 days off, 3 out of 4 weeks or 4 out of 4 weeks). The expansion part consisted of patients with small-cell lung cancer, HER2-negative breast cancer, MYC-amplified/ß-catenin-mutated (MT) tumours or other (basket cohort). RESULTS: In the escalation part (n = 34 patients), dose-limiting toxicities were one grade 3 nausea, two grade 2 and one grade 3 ocular toxicity and a combination of fatigue, ocular toxicity and nausea in one patient (all grade 2) at dose levels of 150, 200, 250 and 300 mg, respectively. Most frequent treatment-related adverse events were fatigue (32%), diarrhoea (24%) and ocular toxicity (24%). Toxicity grade ≥3 in ≥10% of patients were diarrhoea (15%) and increased lipase (12%). The maximum tolerated dose was 250 mg BID. Due to one additional grade 1 ocular toxicity, the RP2D was set at 200 mg BID (4 days on/3 days off, 3 out of 4 weeks), which was further explored in the expansion part (n = 40 patients). Target inhibition in paired skin biopsies was shown. CONCLUSIONS: TAS-119 has a favourable and remarkably distinct safety profile from other AurA inhibitors. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02448589.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Aurora Quinasa A/antagonistas & inhibidores , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Anciano , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos/farmacocinética , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Dosis Máxima Tolerada , Persona de Mediana Edad , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/farmacocinéticaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Bromodomain and extra-terminal (BET) proteins are epigenetic readers that can drive carcinogenesis and therapy resistance. RO6870810 is a novel, small-molecule BET inhibitor. METHODS: We conducted a Phase 1 study of RO6870810 administered subcutaneously for 21 or 14 days of 28- or 21-day cycles, respectively, in patients with the nuclear protein of the testis carcinoma (NC), other solid tumours, or diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) with MYC deregulation. RESULTS: Fatigue (42%), decreased appetite (35%) and injection-site erythema (35%) were the most common treatment-related adverse events. Pharmacokinetic parameters demonstrated linearity over the dose range tested and support once-daily dosing. Pharmacodynamic assessments demonstrated sustained decreases in CD11b levels in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Objective response rates were 25% (2/8), 2% (1/47) and 11% (2/19) for patients with NC, other solid tumours and DLBCL, respectively. Responding tumours had evidence of deregulated MYC expression. CONCLUSIONS: This trial establishes the safety, favourable pharmacokinetics, evidence of target engagement and preliminary single-agent activity of RO6870810. Responses in patients with NC, other solid tumours and DLBCL provide proof-of-principle for BET inhibition in MYC-driven cancers. The results support further exploration of RO6870810 as monotherapy and in combinations. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT01987362.
Asunto(s)
Azepinas/administración & dosificación , Azepinas/efectos adversos , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/tratamiento farmacológico , Proteínas de Neoplasias/metabolismo , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Proteínas Nucleares/metabolismo , Proteínas/antagonistas & inhibidores , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Azepinas/sangre , Azepinas/farmacocinética , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Femenino , Humanos , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/sangre , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/sangre , Neoplasias/metabolismo , Bibliotecas de Moléculas Pequeñas/administración & dosificación , Bibliotecas de Moléculas Pequeñas/efectos adversos , Bibliotecas de Moléculas Pequeñas/farmacocinéticaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Fusions involving one of three tropomyosin receptor kinases (TRK) occur in diverse cancers in children and adults. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of larotrectinib, a highly selective TRK inhibitor, in adults and children who had tumors with these fusions. METHODS: We enrolled patients with consecutively and prospectively identified TRK fusion-positive cancers, detected by molecular profiling as routinely performed at each site, into one of three protocols: a phase 1 study involving adults, a phase 1-2 study involving children, or a phase 2 study involving adolescents and adults. The primary end point for the combined analysis was the overall response rate according to independent review. Secondary end points included duration of response, progression-free survival, and safety. RESULTS: A total of 55 patients, ranging in age from 4 months to 76 years, were enrolled and treated. Patients had 17 unique TRK fusion-positive tumor types. The overall response rate was 75% (95% confidence interval [CI], 61 to 85) according to independent review and 80% (95% CI, 67 to 90) according to investigator assessment. At 1 year, 71% of the responses were ongoing and 55% of the patients remained progression-free. The median duration of response and progression-free survival had not been reached. At a median follow-up of 9.4 months, 86% of the patients with a response (38 of 44 patients) were continuing treatment or had undergone surgery that was intended to be curative. Adverse events were predominantly of grade 1, and no adverse event of grade 3 or 4 that was considered by the investigators to be related to larotrectinib occurred in more than 5% of patients. No patient discontinued larotrectinib owing to drug-related adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Larotrectinib had marked and durable antitumor activity in patients with TRK fusion-positive cancer, regardless of the age of the patient or of the tumor type. (Funded by Loxo Oncology and others; ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT02122913 , NCT02637687 , and NCT02576431 .).
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Pirazoles/uso terapéutico , Pirimidinas/uso terapéutico , Proteínas Tirosina Quinasas Receptoras/antagonistas & inhibidores , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Niño , Preescolar , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/química , Proteínas de Fusión Oncogénica/análisis , Proteínas Quinasas/análisis , Proteínas Quinasas/genética , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Background Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) promote tumor growth, metastasis, and therapeutic resistance via colony-stimulating factor-1 (CSF-1), acting through CSF-1 receptor (CSF-1R) signaling. This phase 1 study determined the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics, immunogenicity, and efficacy of the anti-CSF-1R antibody LY3022855 in solid tumors. Methods Patients with advanced solid tumors refractory to standard therapy were enrolled and treated in 2 dosing cohorts: weight-based (part A) and non-weight-based (part B). Part A patients were assigned to intravenous (IV) dose-escalation cohorts: 2.5 mg/kg once per week (QW), 0.3 mg/kg QW, 0.6 mg/kg QW, 1.25 mg/kg once every 2 weeks (Q2W) and 1.25 mg/kg QW doses of LY3022855. Non-weight-based doses in part B were 100 mg and 150 mg IV QW. Results Fifty-two patients (mean age 58.6 ± 10.4 years) were treated with ≥1 dose of LY3022855 (range: 4-6). Five dose-limiting toxicities (left ventricular dysfunction, anemia, pancreatitis, rhabdomyolysis, and acute kidney injury) occurred in 4 patients. The non-weight-based 100 mg QW dose was established as the RP2D. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were increase in liver function variables, fatigue, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, anorexia, pyrexia, increased lipase, amylase, and lactate dehydrogenase. Clearance decreased with increasing dose and weight-based dosing had minimal effect on pharmacokinetics. Serum CSF-1, and IL-34 levels increased at higher doses and more frequent dosing, whereas TAMs and CD14dimCD16bright levels decreased. Three patients achieved stable disease. No responses were seen. Conclusions LY3022855 was well tolerated and showed dose-dependent pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics and limited clinical activity in a heterogenous solid tumor population. ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT01346358 (Registration Date: May 3, 2011).
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Piridinas/uso terapéutico , Administración Intravenosa , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/farmacocinética , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos/farmacocinética , Estudios de Cohortes , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Piridinas/efectos adversos , Piridinas/farmacocinética , Receptores de Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos y Macrófagos/antagonistas & inhibidores , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Temozolomide (TMZ) generates DNA adducts that are repaired by direct DNA and base excision repair mechanisms. Methoxyamine (MX, TRC-102) potentiates TMZ activity by binding to apurinic and apyrimidinic (AP) sites after removal of N3-methyladenine and N7-methylguanine, inhibiting site recognition of AP endonuclease. We conducted a phase I trial to determine the maximum tolerated dose and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of intravenous MX when given with oral TMZ. Patients with advanced solid tumors and progression on standard treatment were enrolled to a standard 3 + 3 dose escalation trial assessing escalating doses of TMZ and MX. Tumor response was assessed per RECIST and adverse events (AEs) by CTCAEv3. Pharmacokinetics (PK) of MX and COMET assays on peripheral blood mononuclear cells were performed. 38 patients were enrolled-median age 59.5 years (38-76), mean number of cycles 2.9 [1-13]. No DLTs were observed. Cycle 1 grade 3 AEs included fatigue, lymphopenia, anemia, INR, leukopenia, neutropenia, allergic reaction, constipation, psychosis and paranoia. Cycle 2-13 grade 4 AEs included thrombocytopenia and confusion. A partial response was seen in 1 patient with a pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PNET) and six additional patients, each with different tumor types, demonstrated prolonged stable disease. MX PK was linear with dose and was not affected by concomitant TMZ. TMZ 200 mg/m2 daily × 5 may be safely administered with MX 150 mg/m2 intravenously once on day 1 with minimal toxicity. Further studies assessing this drug combination in select tumor types where temozolomide has activity may be warranted.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/uso terapéutico , Hidroxilaminas/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Temozolomida/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/farmacocinética , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/farmacocinética , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Área Bajo la Curva , Reparación del ADN/efectos de los fármacos , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Sinergismo Farmacológico , Femenino , Semivida , Humanos , Hidroxilaminas/administración & dosificación , Hidroxilaminas/efectos adversos , Hidroxilaminas/farmacocinética , Masculino , Dosis Máxima Tolerada , Tasa de Depuración Metabólica , Persona de Mediana Edad , Temozolomida/efectos adversos , Temozolomida/farmacocinéticaRESUMEN
The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) provide recommended management for patients with SCLC, including diagnosis, primary treatment, surveillance for relapse, and subsequent treatment. This selection for the journal focuses on metastatic (known as extensive-stage) SCLC, which is more common than limited-stage SCLC. Systemic therapy alone can palliate symptoms and prolong survival in most patients with extensive-stage disease. Smoking cessation counseling and intervention should be strongly promoted in patients with SCLC and other high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas. The "Summary of the Guidelines Updates" section in the SCLC algorithm outlines the most recent revisions for the 2022 update, which are described in greater detail in this revised Discussion text.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pulmonares , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células Pequeñas , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Oncología Médica , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células Pequeñas/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células Pequeñas/patología , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células Pequeñas/terapiaRESUMEN
The role of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) and thoracic radiation therapy (TRT) in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer remains controversial. The authors examined the National Cancer Database and identified patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer with no brain metastasis. Patients were excluded if they died 30 days from diagnosis, did not receive polychemotherapy, had other palliative radiation or had missing information. A propensity score-matched analysis was also performed. A total of 21,019 patients were identified. The majority of patients did not receive radiation (69%), whereas 10% received PCI and 21% received TRT. The addition of PCI and TRT improved median survival and survival at 1 and 2 years (p ≤ 0.05). The propensity score-matched analysis confirmed the same overall survival benefit with both PCI and TRT. This registry-based analysis of >1500 accredited cancer programs shows that PCI and TRT are not commonly utilized for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer patients who are treated with multiagent chemotherapy. The addition of PCI and TRT significantly improves overall survival in this otherwise poor prognostic group. Further research is needed to confirm the role of PCI and TRT, especially in the era of improved systemic therapy.
Lay abstract The role of radiation therapy in patients with metastatic small cell lung cancer remains controversial. The authors examined the National Cancer Database and identified patients with metastatic small cell lung cancer without brain metastasis. Patients were excluded if they died 30 days from diagnosis, did not receive multiagent chemotherapy, had other palliative radiation or had missing information regarding treatment. A total of 21,019 patients were identified. The majority of patients did not receive radiation (69%), whereas 10% received radiation to the brain and 21% received radiation to their lungs. The addition of brain and lung radiation therapy improved median survival and survival at 1 and 2 years. The addition of prophylactic cranial irradiation and thoracic radiation therapy improves survival in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer. Future research is needed to evaluate the role of radiation in the era of chemoimmunotherapy.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas/prevención & control , Quimioradioterapia/estadística & datos numéricos , Irradiación Craneana/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células Pequeñas/prevención & control , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Encefálicas/secundario , Quimioradioterapia/métodos , Bases de Datos Factuales/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Pronóstico , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células Pequeñas/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células Pequeñas/mortalidad , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células Pequeñas/secundario , Análisis de Supervivencia , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
This study developed a novel methodology to correlate genome-scale microRNA (miRNA) expression profiles in a lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) cohort (n = 57) with Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare LUSC patients (n = 33,897) as a function of composite tumor progression indicators of T, N, and M cancer stage and tumor grade. The selected prognostic and chemopredictive miRNAs were extensively validated with miRNA expression profiles of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patient samples collected from US hospitals (n = 156) and public consortia including NCI-60, The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA; n = 1016), and Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE; n = 117). Hsa-miR-142-3p was associated with good prognosis and chemosensitivity in all the studied datasets. Hsa-miRNA-142-3p target genes (NUP205, RAN, CSE1L, SNRPD1, RPS11, SF3B1, COPA, ARCN1, and SNRNP200) had a significant impact on proliferation in 100% of the tested NSCLC cell lines in CRISPR-Cas9 (n = 78) and RNA interference (RNAi) screening (n = 92). Hsa-miR-142-3p-mediated pathways and functional networks in NSCLC short-term survivors were elucidated. Overall, the approach integrating SEER-Medicare data with comprehensive external validation can identify miRNAs with consistent expression patterns in tumor progression, with potential implications for prognosis and prediction of chemoresponse in large NSCLC patient populations.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , MicroARNs/genética , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/epidemiología , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/genética , Biología Computacional/métodos , Bases de Datos Factuales , Bases de Datos Genéticas , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Masculino , Medicare , Pronóstico , Programa de VERF , Tasa de Supervivencia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The selective TRK inhibitor larotrectinib was approved for paediatric and adult patients with advanced TRK fusion-positive solid tumours based on a primary analysis set of 55 patients. The aim of our analysis was to explore the efficacy and long-term safety of larotrectinib in a larger population of patients with TRK fusion-positive solid tumours. METHODS: Patients were enrolled and treated in a phase 1 adult, a phase 1/2 paediatric, or a phase 2 adolescent and adult trial. Some eligibility criteria differed between these studies. For this pooled analysis, eligible patients were aged 1 month or older, with a locally advanced or metastatic non-CNS primary, TRK fusion-positive solid tumour, who had received standard therapy previously if available. This analysis set includes the 55 patients on which approval of larotrectinib was based. Larotrectinib was administered orally (capsule or liquid formulation), on a continuous 28-day schedule, to adults mostly at a dose of 100 mg twice daily, and to paediatric patients mostly at a dose of 100 mg/m2 (maximum of 100 mg) twice daily. The primary endpoint was objective response as assessed by local investigators in an intention-to-treat analysis. Contributing trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02122913 (active not recruiting), NCT02637687 (recruiting), and NCT02576431 (recruiting). FINDINGS: Between May 1, 2014, and Feb 19, 2019, 159 patients with TRK fusion-positive cancer were enrolled and treated with larotrectinib. Ages ranged from less than 1 month to 84 years. The proportion of patients with an objective response according to investigator assessment was 121 (79%, 95% CI 72-85) of 153 evaluable patients, with 24 (16%) having complete responses. In a safety population of 260 patients treated regardless of TRK fusion status, the most common grade 3 or 4 larotrectinib-related adverse events were increased alanine aminotransferase (eight [3%] of 260 patients), anaemia (six, 2%), and decreased neutrophil count (five [2%]). The most common larotrectinib-related serious adverse events were increased alanine aminotransferase (two [<1%] of 260 patients), increased aspartate aminotransferase (two [<1%]), and nausea (two [<1%]). No treatment-related deaths occurred. INTERPRETATION: These data confirm that TRK fusions define a unique molecular subgroup of advanced solid tumours for which larotrectinib is highly active. Safety data indicate that long-term administration of larotrectinib is feasible. FUNDING: Bayer and Loxo Oncology.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias/química , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Proteínas/análisis , Pirazoles/uso terapéutico , Pirimidinas/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Purpose Brentuximab vedotin (BV) is an anti-CD30 antibody-drug conjugate used in the treatment of several types of lymphomas. Expression of the target antigen has also been reported on a variety of malignant tumors of nonlymphoid origin. This phase 2, open-label study evaluated the safety and antitumor activity of BV in patients with CD30-expressing nonlymphomatous malignancies. Methods Patients were dosed with 1.8 or 2.4 mg/kg BV once every three weeks. Antitumor activity was assessed at Cycles 2, 4, and every 4 cycles thereafter. Patients with stable disease or better were eligible to continue treatment until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or study closure. Results Of the 2693 patients screened, 3.8% had solid tumors with CD30 expression and 63 eligible patients with solid tumors enrolled in this study. The most common CD30 positive solid tumors were testicular cancer and mesothelioma. Both subtypes had more than one patient with an objective response. The median duration of BV exposure was 6.1 weeks. The disease control rate, defined as achieving stable disease or better at any point during the study, was 55%. The objective response rate was 11%, with a median duration of response of 2.92 months. The most common adverse events reported were fatigue (57%), nausea (33%), and decreased appetite (32%). Conclusion The safety profile of BV in patients with solid tumors was similar to the known safety profile of BV. In solid tumors, BV had modest activity as a single agent, which was similar to other second-line treatments already available to patients.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Brentuximab Vedotina/uso terapéutico , Antígeno Ki-1/metabolismo , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/efectos adversos , Brentuximab Vedotina/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/metabolismo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Purpose This phase Ib study (NCT01862328) evaluated the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, and efficacy of pevonedistat in combination with standard-of-care chemotherapies in patients with solid tumors. Methods Patients received pevonedistat with docetaxel (arm 1, n = 22), carboplatin plus paclitaxel (arm 2, n = 26), or gemcitabine (arm 3, n = 10) in 21-days (arms 1 and 2) or 28-days (arm 3) cycles. A lead-in cohort (arm 2a, n = 6) determined the arm 2 carboplatin dose. Dose escalation proceeded via continual modified reassessment. Results Pevonedistat MTD was 25 mg/m2 (arm 1) or 20 mg/m2 (arm 2); arm 3 was discontinued due to poor tolerability. Fifteen (23%) patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities during cycle 1 (grade ≥3 liver enzyme elevations, febrile neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia), managed with dose holds or reductions. Drug-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 95% of patients. Most common AEs included fatigue (56%) and nausea (50%). One drug-related death occurred in arm 3 (febrile neutropenia). Pevonedistat exposure increased when co-administered with carboplatin plus paclitaxel; no obvious changes were observed when co-administered with docetaxel or gemcitabine. Among 54 response-evaluable patients, two had complete responses (arm 2) and 10 had partial responses (three in arm 1, one in arm 2a, six in arm 2); overall response rates were 16% (arm 1) and 35% (arm 2). High ERCC1 expression correlated with clinical benefit in arm 2. Conclusion Pevonedistat with docetaxel or with carboplatin plus paclitaxel was tolerable without cumulative toxicity. Sustained clinical responses were observed in pretreated patients receiving pevonedistat with carboplatin and paclitaxel. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01862328.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Proteína NEDD8/antagonistas & inhibidores , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/farmacocinética , Carboplatino/administración & dosificación , Estudios de Cohortes , Ciclopentanos/administración & dosificación , Desoxicitidina/administración & dosificación , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Docetaxel/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Dosis Máxima Tolerada , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/patología , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Pronóstico , Pirimidinas/administración & dosificación , Distribución Tisular , Adulto Joven , GemcitabinaAsunto(s)
Supervivientes de Cáncer , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Masculino , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Supervivientes de Cáncer/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Fumar/epidemiología , Fumar/efectos adversos , Determinación de la Elegibilidad/métodosRESUMEN
AIMS: The histone deacetylase inhibitor belinostat has activity in various cancers. Because belinostat is metabolized by the liver, reduced hepatic clearance could lead to excessive drug accumulation and increased toxicity. Safety data in patients with liver dysfunction are needed for this drug to reach its full potential in the clinic. METHODS: We performed a phase 1 trial to determine the safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and pharmacokinetics of belinostat in patients with advanced cancer and varying degrees of liver dysfunction. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients were enrolled and divided into cohorts based on liver function. In patients with mild dysfunction, the MTD was the same as the recommended phase 2 dose (1000 mg/m2 /day). Belinostat was well tolerated in patients with moderate and severe liver dysfunction, although the trial was closed before the MTD in these cohorts could be determined. The mean clearance of belinostat was 661 mL/min/m2 in patients with normal liver function, compared to 542, 505 and 444 mL/min/m2 in patients with mild, moderate and severe hepatic dysfunction. Although this trial was not designed to assess clinical activity, of the 47 patients evaluable for response, 13 patients (28%) experienced stable disease. CONCLUSION: While a statistically significant difference in clearance indicates increased belinostat exposure with worsening liver function, no relationship was observed between belinostat exposure and toxicity. An assessment of belinostat metabolites revealed significant differences in metabolic pathway capability in patients with differing levels of liver dysfunction. Further studies are needed to establish formal dosing guidelines in this patient population.
Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de Histona Desacetilasas/farmacocinética , Ácidos Hidroxámicos/farmacocinética , Hepatopatías/fisiopatología , Hígado/metabolismo , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Sulfonamidas/farmacocinética , Adulto , Anciano , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Inhibidores de Histona Desacetilasas/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Histona Desacetilasas/efectos adversos , Humanos , Ácidos Hidroxámicos/administración & dosificación , Ácidos Hidroxámicos/efectos adversos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Hígado/fisiopatología , Hepatopatías/diagnóstico , Hepatopatías/etiología , Masculino , Dosis Máxima Tolerada , Tasa de Depuración Metabólica/fisiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Neoplasias/patología , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Sulfonamidas/administración & dosificación , Sulfonamidas/efectos adversosRESUMEN
Introduction Preclinical data suggest quinacrine acts as an inhibitor of FACT (facilitates chromatin transcription) complex, which may play a role in TKI (tyrosine kinase inhibitor) resistance. The aim of this Phase I study was to study the safety and assess the maximum tolerated dose of quinacrine in combination with erlotinib in non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods This was a phase I study with standard 3 + 3 dose escalation design with the primary aim of determining the maximum tolerated dose. Two of 3 patients enrolled at dose level 1 experienced dose limiting toxicity (DLT). The next 6 patients were enrolled at dose level - 1 and none of these 6 patients experienced DLT. The dose of 50 mg of quinacrine every other day with 150 mg of erlotinib was established as the maximum tolerated and the recommended phase II dose. One of 3 patients treated at dose level 1 had stable disease. One of 6 patients treated at dose level - 1 had partial response for 6 months, the rest had progressive disease at the time of first assessment. Conclusion Combination of quinacrine and erlotinib was well tolerated but showed limited efficacy in advanced NSCLC.