RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Hydrocephalus is a common condition in pediatric neurosurgeon's clinical practice. Peritoneal and atrial shunting is the treatment of choice in the immense majority of patients. Sometimes, there are complex cases that may need innovative solutions in order to implant the distal catheter of the shunt: in these situations, the gallbladder is a well-described option and it can be safely used. METHODS: We report the case of a 4-month-old baby with a wide optic-chiasmal hypothalamic glioma generating hydrocephalus with high protein values in CSF. Ventriculobiliary shunting was decided, and the distal catheter was directed by the assistance of laparoscopic surgery. RESULTS: The outcome was satisfactory. CONCLUSIONS: As far as we know, laparoscopic placement of a distal catheter in the gallbladder has not been described in the literature; herein, we describe the tenets and the technical tips of this approach.
Asunto(s)
Derivaciones del Líquido Cefalorraquídeo/métodos , Vesícula Biliar/cirugía , Hidrocefalia/cirugía , Laparoscopía/métodos , Glioma/complicaciones , Humanos , Hidrocefalia/etiología , Neoplasias Hipotalámicas/complicaciones , Lactante , Masculino , Quiasma Óptico/patología , Neoplasias del Nervio Óptico/complicacionesRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Voiding urosonography (VUS) is a dynamic imaging technique which evaluates the lower urinary tract by introducing sonographic contrast into the bladder, preferably used in the diagnosis of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). Our goals were to describe the clinical indications for performing a VUS for VUR's diagnosis and analyse its diagnostic reliability. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cross-sectional study carried on patients under 15 years old with a VUS taken between November 2013-2020. Sex, age, indications (lower urinary tract infection-LUTI; dilatated lower urinary tract-DLUT; duplex collecting system-DCS), results (presence/absence of VUR, score and side) and complications were analysed. U Mann-Whitney and Chi-squared tests were used and 2 predictive capacity models for the indications used to detect VUR were employed (logistic binomial regression and multilayer perceptron neural network). Statistical significance p < 0.05. RESULTS: 415 VUS were completed correctly (male 51.8%, median age 7.3 (3.1-15.3) months). Indications were: LUTI (67.5%), DLUT (33.5%) and DCS (10.2%); presenting 1, 2 and 3 indications in 86.5%, 12.8% and 0.7% respectively. VUR was diagnosed in 34.7% cases. A tendency towards statistically significance was showed related to male sex (p = 0.052) and the only significative clinical indication for VUR was DCS (p = 0.007). Patients with 2 simultaneous indications had higher probability of VUR (p = 0.012). DCS presence or male sex were the only predictive variables of VUR: DCS = OR 1.89 (1.54-6.52) (p = 0.006) and male sex = OR 1.56 (1.03-2.35) (p = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: VUS is a thriving technique, radiation free and with a low complications rate. Presence of DCS, male sex or 2 simultaneous indications for VUS increase the probability of presenting VUR.
Asunto(s)
Reflujo Vesicoureteral , Niño , Humanos , Masculino , Lactante , Adolescente , Reflujo Vesicoureteral/diagnóstico por imagen , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios Transversales , Medios de Contraste , Micción , Ultrasonografía/métodosRESUMEN
No disponible
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Recién Nacido , Ciencias de la Salud , Espectroscopía Infrarroja Corta , Gastroscopía , Recien Nacido Prematuro , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema DigestivoRESUMEN
Introduction: Voiding urosonography (VUS) is a dynamic imaging technique which evaluates the lower urinary tract by introducing sonographic contrast into the bladder, preferably used in the diagnosis of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). Our goals were to describe the clinical indications for performing a VUS for VURs diagnosis and analyse its diagnostic reliability. Material and Methods: Cross-sectional study carried on patients under 15 years old with a VUS taken between November 2013-2020. Sex, age, indications (lower urinary tract infectionLUTI; dilatated lower urinary tractDLUT; duplex collecting systemDCS), results (presence/absence of VUR, score and side) and complications were analysed. U Mann-Whitney and Chi-squared tests were used and 2 predictive capacity models for the indications used to detect VUR were employed (logistic binomial regression and multilayer perceptron neural network). Statistical significance p < 0.05. Results: 415 VUS were completed correctly (male 51.8%, median age 7.3 (3.1-15.3) months). Indications were: LUTI (67.5%), DLUT (33.5%) and DCS (10.2%); presenting 1, 2 and 3 indications in 86.5%, 12.8% and 0.7% respectively. VUR was diagnosed in 34.7% cases. A tendency towards statistically significance was showed related to male sex (p = 0.052) and the only significative clinical indication for VUR was DCS (p = 0.007). Patients with 2 simultaneous indications had higher probability of VUR (p = 0.012). DCS presence or male sex were the only predictive variables of VUR: DCS = OR 1.89 (1.54-6.52) (p = 0.006) and male sex = OR 1.56 (1.03-2.35) (p = 0.035). Conclusions: VUS is a thriving technique, radiation free and with a low complications rate. Presence of DCS, male sex or 2 simultaneous indications for VUS increase the probability of presenting VUR (AU)