RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To determine the predictive value of multiple CT-based measurements, individually and collectively, including arterial collateral filling (AC), tissue perfusion parameters, as well as cortical venous (CV) and medullary venous (MV) outflow, in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a database of patients with AIS in the middle cerebral artery distribution, who underwent evaluation by multiphase CT-angiography and perfusion. AC pial filling was evaluated using a multiphase CTA imaging. The CV status was scored using the adopted PRECISE system based on contrast opacification of the main cortical veins. The MV status was defined by the degree of contrast opacification of medullary veins in one cerebral hemisphere as compared to the contralateral hemisphere. The perfusion parameters were calculated using FDA-approved automated software. A good clinical outcome was defined as a Modified Rankin Scale of 0-2 at 90 days. RESULTS: A total of 64 patients were included. Each of the CT-based measurements could predict clinical outcomes independently (P<0.05). AC pial filling and perfusion core based models did slightly better compared to each of the other models (AUC = 0.66). Among models with two variables, the perfusion core combined with MV status had the highest AUC=0.73 followed by a combination of MV status and AC (AUC=0.72). Multivariable modeling with all four variables resulted in the highest predictive value (AUC=0.77). CONCLUSION: The combination of arterial collateral flow, tissue perfusion, and venous outflow provides a more accurate prediction of clinical outcome in AIS than each variable alone. This additive effect of these techniques suggests that the information collected by each of these methods only partially overlaps.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine if interhemispheric asymmetry of cortical and medullary veins evaluated on CT angiography can provide a more accurate prediction of outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke when compared to hemispheric asymmetry of cortical or medullary vein drainage alone. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a database of patients with anterior circulation distribution acute ischemic stroke, who were evaluated by multiphase CTA. Cortical veins were evaluated using the adopted Prognostic Evaluation based on Cortical vein score difference In Stroke (PRECISE) system. Medullary veins were evaluated by the presence of asymmetry determined by 5 or more medullary veins visualized in one hemisphere as compared to the contralateral. Good clinical outcome was defined as a Modified Rankin Scale of 0-2 at 90 days. RESULTS: 64 patients were included. The adopted PRECISE score was associated with a good clinical outcome in patients with AIS (OR=3.29; 95 % CI: 1.16 - 9.30; p = 0.023) and had a stronger association with clinical outcome (AUC=0.644) as compared to the asymmetry of MV (AUC=0.609). In a multivariable logistic regression model, combined medullary and cortical vein asymmetry were independently associated with clinical outcomes (AUC=0.721). CONCLUSION: Combined cortical and medullary vein interhemispheric asymmetry is a stronger predictor of clinical outcome in acute ischemic stroke compared to cortical or medullary vein asymmetry alone.