Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
Haematologica ; 99(1): 148-54, 2014 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23996482

RESUMEN

Renal impairment is frequent in patients with multiple myeloma and is correlated with an inferior prognosis. This analysis evaluates the prognostic role of renal impairment in patients with myeloma treated with bortezomib before and after autologous stem cell transplantation within a prospective randomized phase III trial. Eight hundred and twenty-seven newly diagnosed myeloma patients in the HOVON-65/GMMG-HD4 trial were randomized to receive three cycles of vincristine, adriamycin, dexamethasone (VAD) or bortezomib, adriamycin, dexamethasone (PAD) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation and maintenance with thalidomide 50 mg daily (VAD-arm) or bortezomib 1.3 mg/m(2) every 2 weeks (PAD-arm). Baseline serum creatinine was less than 2 mg/dL (Durie-Salmon-stage A) in 746 patients and 2 mg/dL or higher (stage B) in 81. In myeloma patients with a baseline creatinine ≥ 2 mg/dL the renal response rate was 63% in the VAD-arm and 81% in the PAD-arm (P=0.31). The overall myeloma response rate was 64% in the VAD-arm versus 89% in the PAD-arm with 13% complete responses in the VAD-arm versus 36% in the PAD-arm (P=0.01). Overall survival at 3 years for patients with a baseline creatinine ≥ 2 mg/dL was 34% in the VAD-arm versus 74% in the PAD-arm (P<0.001) with a progression-free survival rate at 3 years of 16% in the VAD-arm versus 48% in the PAD-arm (P=0.004). Overall and progression-free survival rates in the PAD-arm were similar in patients with a baseline creatinine ≥ 2 mg/dL or <2 mg/dL. We conclude that a bortezomib-containing treatment before and after autologous stem cell transplantation overcomes the negative prognostic impact of renal impairment in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. The trial was registered at www.trialregister.nl as NTR213 and at www.controlled-trials.com as ISRCTN 64455289.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Ácidos Borónicos/uso terapéutico , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Mieloma Múltiple/complicaciones , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Pirazinas/uso terapéutico , Insuficiencia Renal/etiología , Insuficiencia Renal/prevención & control , Adulto , Anciano , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Ácidos Borónicos/administración & dosificación , Ácidos Borónicos/efectos adversos , Bortezomib , Creatinina/sangre , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mieloma Múltiple/mortalidad , Pirazinas/administración & dosificación , Pirazinas/efectos adversos , Inducción de Remisión , Insuficiencia Renal/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Renal/fisiopatología , Trasplante Autólogo , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Br J Haematol ; 149(2): 244-9, 2010 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20136825

RESUMEN

In the phase III AZA-001 trial, low-dose cytarabine (LDara-C), the most widely used low-dose chemotherapy in patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) who are ineligible for intensive treatment, was found to be associated with poorer survival compared with azacitidine. This analysis further compared the efficacy and the toxicity of these two drug regimens. Before randomization, investigators preselected patients to receive a conventional care regimen, one of which was LDara-C. Of 94 patients preselected to LDara-C, 45 were randomized to azacitidine and 49 to LDara-C. Azacitidine patients had significantly more and longer haematological responses and increased red blood cell transfusion independence. Azacitidine prolonged overall survival versus LDara-C in patients with poor cytogenetic risk, presence of -7/del(7q), and French-American-British subtypes refractory anaemia with excess blasts (RAEB) and RAEB in transformation. When analyzed per patient year of drug exposure, azacitidine treatment was associated with fewer grade 3-4 cytopenias and shorter hospitalisation time than LDara-C in these higher-risk MDS patients.


Asunto(s)
Antimetabolitos Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Azacitidina/uso terapéutico , Citarabina/uso terapéutico , Síndromes Mielodisplásicos/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antimetabolitos Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Azacitidina/efectos adversos , Citarabina/efectos adversos , Esquema de Medicación , Transfusión de Eritrocitos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Hematology ; 18(1): 26-9, 2013 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22980138

RESUMEN

IMPACT NHL was a multicenter, observational study in adults with non-Hodgkin lymphoma receiving CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone) chemotherapy with or without rituximab. Erythropoietin-stimulating agent treatment was given according to routine clinical practice and physician preference. In a subanalysis, outcomes were evaluated in 207 patients who received darbepoetin alfa (DA). The most common reason (81%) for initiating DA was low/declining hemoglobin (Hb) concentration. Mean (±standard deviation) duration of DA exposure was 8.8 ± 6.9 weeks (mean number of doses, 5.1 ± 4.6). Overall, 23% of patients had chemotherapy and DA treatment synchronized more than 75% of the time. At the time of DA initiation, 67% of patients had Hb concentrations in the guideline-recommended range (9-11 g/dl). Of 89 patients with Hb concentrations <10 g/dl at DA initiation and still receiving DA 5 weeks later, 92% (Kaplan-Meier) achieved Hb concentrations 10-12 g/dl between week 5 and at the end of treatment.


Asunto(s)
Anemia/inducido químicamente , Anemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Eritropoyetina/análogos & derivados , Hematínicos/uso terapéutico , Linfoma no Hodgkin/sangre , Anticuerpos Monoclonales de Origen Murino/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales de Origen Murino/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Ciclofosfamida/administración & dosificación , Ciclofosfamida/efectos adversos , Darbepoetina alfa , Doxorrubicina/administración & dosificación , Doxorrubicina/efectos adversos , Esquema de Medicación , Eritropoyetina/efectos adversos , Eritropoyetina/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Linfoma no Hodgkin/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prednisolona/administración & dosificación , Prednisolona/efectos adversos , Rituximab , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vincristina/administración & dosificación , Vincristina/efectos adversos
4.
Leuk Res ; 36(5): 548-53, 2012 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22385870

RESUMEN

Febrile neutropenia (FN) risk-assessment and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) prophylaxis use in clinical practice was evaluated in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma receiving R-CHOP-21. More G-CSF primary prophylaxis was used in patients assessed as high FN risk, but R-CHOP-21 was associated with substantial myelotoxicity in both high- and low-risk groups. In a multivariate analysis, older age, poor performance status, lower baseline hemoglobin, and lack of G-CSF prophylaxis were significantly associated with occurrence of FN in any cycle. Results highlight the need for improved FN risk-assessment and thorough guideline adherence to further reduce FN and better support chemotherapy delivery.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/tratamiento farmacológico , Neutropenia/inducido químicamente , Medición de Riesgo , Adulto , Anciano , Anticuerpos Monoclonales de Origen Murino/efectos adversos , Ciclofosfamida/efectos adversos , Doxorrubicina/efectos adversos , Femenino , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Prednisona/efectos adversos , Factores de Riesgo , Rituximab , Vincristina/efectos adversos
5.
J Clin Oncol ; 30(24): 2946-55, 2012 Aug 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22802322

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: We investigated whether bortezomib during induction and maintenance improves survival in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 827 eligible patients with newly diagnosed symptomatic MM were randomly assigned to receive induction therapy with vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone (VAD) or bortezomib, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone (PAD) followed by high-dose melphalan and autologous stem-cell transplantation. Maintenance consisted of thalidomide 50 mg (VAD) once per day or bortezomib 1.3 mg/m(2) (PAD) once every 2 weeks for 2 years. The primary analysis was progression-free survival (PFS) adjusted for International Staging System (ISS) stage. RESULTS: Complete response (CR), including near CR, was superior after PAD induction (15% v 31%; P < .001) and bortezomib maintenance (34% v 49%; P < .001). After a median follow-up of 41 months, PFS was superior in the PAD arm (median of 28 months v 35 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.75; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.90; P = .002). In multivariate analysis, overall survival (OS) was better in the PAD arm (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.60 to 1.00; P = .049). In high-risk patients presenting with increased creatinine more than 2 mg/dL, bortezomib significantly improved PFS from a median of 13 months to 30 months (HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.26 to 0.78; P = .004) and OS from a median of 21 months to 54 months (HR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.16 to 0.65; P < .001). A benefit was also observed in patients with deletion 17p13 (median PFS, 12 v 22 months; HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.26 to 0.86; P = .01; median OS, 24 months v not reached at 54 months; HR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.18 to 0.74; P = .003). CONCLUSION: Bortezomib during induction and maintenance improves CR and achieves superior PFS and OS.


Asunto(s)
Ácidos Borónicos/administración & dosificación , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Pirazinas/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Bortezomib , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Dexametasona/uso terapéutico , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Doxorrubicina/administración & dosificación , Doxorrubicina/uso terapéutico , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Humanos , Quimioterapia de Mantención , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Inducción de Remisión , Talidomida/administración & dosificación , Vincristina/uso terapéutico
6.
Leuk Lymphoma ; 52(5): 796-803, 2011 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21338278

RESUMEN

CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisolone) ± rituximab [(± R)CHOP] is the current standard of care for aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Anemia resulting from chemotherapy can be treated with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs). As part of the observational IMPACT NHL study, data were collected on ESA use and anemia-related outcomes in 1829 adults receiving (± R)CHOP-14 or (± R)CHOP-21. Overall, 33% of patients were anemic during chemotherapy. Older age, lower baseline hemoglobin (Hb), worse performance status, more advanced disease stage, and use of CHOP-14 were significant predictors of transfusion and anemia in logistic regression models. ESAs were received by 404 patients, usually in response to low or declining Hb levels. Most patients (65%) had Hb 9-11 g/dL at ESA initiation, and 89% (Kaplan-Meier percentage) achieved Hb 10-12 g/dL. In conclusion, two-thirds of anemic patients with NHL receiving (± R)CHOP initiated ESA treatment at Hb 9-11 g/dL, and most achieved target Hb levels (10-12 g/dL).


Asunto(s)
Anemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales de Origen Murino/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Hematínicos/administración & dosificación , Linfoma no Hodgkin/complicaciones , Linfoma no Hodgkin/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Anemia/inducido químicamente , Anemia/etiología , Ciclofosfamida/administración & dosificación , Doxorrubicina/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Hemoglobinas/análisis , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Observación , Prednisolona/administración & dosificación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Rituximab , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vincristina/administración & dosificación
8.
Cancer ; 106(7): 1560-8, 2006 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16502436

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has improved the survival of patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome-related lymphoma (ARL). The German ARL Study Group investigated whether HAART administered concomitantly with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) chemotherapy compromised the course of immune parameters during and after chemotherapy and exerted a positive effect on remission and survival. METHODS: From 1997 to 2001, 72 patients with ARL were stratified prospectively into a standard-risk group (n = 48 patients) and a high-risk group (n = 24 patients) with either 0-1 or 2-3 of the following risk factors: CD4 < 50/microL, prior opportunistic infection, and/or a World Health Organization performance status > or = 3. Patients in the high-risk group received > or =75% of the CHOP regimen. RESULTS: In the standard-risk group (CD4 = 223/muL; age-adjusted International Prognostic Index [aaIPI], 38% > or = 2), the complete remission (CR) rate was 79%, and median survival was not reached after a median 47 months of follow-up. CD4 counts did not change from baseline to 4 weeks after the end of chemotherapy (206/microL). In the high-risk group (CD4 = 34/muL; aaIPI, 88% > or = 2), the CR rate was 29%, and the median survival was 7.2 months (3 patients survived for > 3 yrs). Toxicity was moderate: Leukopenia Grade 3 or 4 occurred in 100 of 249 chemotherapy cycles (40%) in the standard-risk group and in 70 of 102 cycles (69%) in the high-risk group. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the aaIPI, the survival of patients in the standard-risk group was very similar to that achieved by nonhuman immunodeficiency virus-infected patients who had aggressive lymphomas. Concurrent CHOP plus HAART can be administered in an outpatient setting. Thus, the authors recommend using this modality as first-line therapy for patients with ARL.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Inmunodeficiencia Adquirida/complicaciones , Antirretrovirales/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Terapia Antirretroviral Altamente Activa , Linfoma no Hodgkin/tratamiento farmacológico , Linfoma no Hodgkin/virología , Administración Oral , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Terapia Combinada , Ciclofosfamida/administración & dosificación , Doxorrubicina/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Masculino , Prednisona/administración & dosificación , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Análisis de Supervivencia , Vincristina/administración & dosificación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA