Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 20(5): 872-4, 2014 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24750785

RESUMEN

After porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) was detected in the United States in 2013, we tested environmental samples from trailers in which pigs had been transported. PEDV was found in 5.2% of trailers not contaminated at arrival, , suggesting that the transport process is a source of transmission if adequate hygiene measures are not implemented.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/veterinaria , Enfermedades de los Porcinos/epidemiología , Transportes , Animales , Microbiología Ambiental , Virus de la Diarrea Epidémica Porcina , Porcinos , Enfermedades de los Porcinos/transmisión , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
2.
Porcine Health Manag ; 8(1): 23, 2022 Jun 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35672863

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In 2013, PEDV was introduced in the United States (U.S.) and rapidly spread across the country. Here we describe the occurrence of PEDV in the growing pig herd of one large U.S. production system through an active surveillance set in place between October 2019 and November 2020 designed to assess disease status upon placement into the growing pig site, before shipping to the slaughter plant and when diarrhea events were present at the site. We also assessed the impact of preventive procedures implemented in PEDV incidence that comprised site-specific equipment segregation and biosecurity changes regarding personnel movement between sites. RESULTS: 36.50% (100/274) of the sites had at least one PEDV introduction event before preventive procedures were implemented, yielding an incidence rate of 2.41 per 100 farm-weeks. Most (63/100) of them occurred in sites where animals were placed negative and PEDV was detected in clinical samples in a median of 8 weeks post placement. After preventive procedures were implemented, the overall PEDV incidence rate dropped to 0.37 per 100 farm-weeks (84.65% reduction, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: These results highlight the importance of systematic surveillance to identify the burden of diseases, areas of improvement in prevention and control, and to allow the measurement of the impact of policy/protocol changes.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA