Life after breast cancer: 'Being' a young African American survivor.

Objective: In the United States, 26,534 young women (≤45 years) were diagnosed with breast cancer in 2017. Young African American (AA) women have higher incidence and mortality rates than Whites and Hispanics. Yet, few published studies describe survivorship (life after breast cancer diagnosis) experiences among this group. Here, we explore the lived experience of young AA breast cancer survivorship (via quality of life [QOL]).Design: This phenomenological study was framed by the QOL Applied to Breast Cancer model. Fifteen young AA survivors from the Southern U. S. participated in two semi-structured interviews. Methods of transcendental phenomenology were used for data collection and analysis.Results: Five themes emerged from participants' (mean age = 35 years; survivorship = 4 years) descriptions of survivorship experience: (1) actively managing spiritual self, (2) actively managing physical self, (3) actively managing psychological self, (4) actively managing social self, and (5) seeking survivorship knowledge. Participants perceived survivorship as a labile 'new normal' and 'ongoing struggle,' in which spirituality and survivorship knowledge were key to restructuring their lives.Conclusions: Survivorship among young AA survivors was more fluid and complex than the QOL model explained. Findings describe young AA breast cancer survivorship and indicate areas of potential strengths and distress. Healthcare providers and ancillary staff must exercise cultural competence to assess and anticipate young AA survivors' needs and concerns. Implementing targeted survivorship interventions, accounting for cultural contexts (e.g. high spirituality) and need for age-specific survivorship information, may improve QOL among young AA survivors.

Effects of tandem cognitive behavioral therapy and healthy lifestyle interventions on health-related outcomes in cancer survivors: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: Healthy lifestyle (HL) behaviors and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) have been individually shown to improve adverse effects of cancer treatment. Little is known about how such programs in tandem affect health-related outcomes. This review evaluates extant literature on tandem CBT/HL interventions on health-related outcomes in cancer survivors. METHODS: A comprehensive search of PubMed, PsychINFO, CINAHL, and Embase databases revealed numerous studies involving CBT and HL tandem interventions in cancer survivors in the last 20 years. Studies meeting the inclusion criteria were examined and assessed by the authors. RESULTS: The 36 studies included 5199 participants. Interventions involved the use of CBT in combination with a HL condition (stress reduction, increasing physical activity, etc.). These tandem conditions were compared against no intervention, usual care, and/or CBT alone or HL alone. Interventions were delivered by a variety of interventionists, and over different durations. The most common HL target outcomes were stress, and insomnia. Most studies (31 of 36) reported a reduction in adverse treatment and/or cancer-related effects. CONCLUSION: Findings were biased with the overrepresentation of breast cancer survivors, and underrepresentation of minority groups, and those with advanced cancer. Thus, this review highlights the need for further research to test tandem interventions against CBT alone and HL alone, and toward identifying the most efficacious interventions for dissemination and implementation across diverse groups of cancer survivors. Implications for cancer survivors Tandem CBT/HL interventions can improve health-related outcomes for cancer survivors when compared to usual care, but there is a paucity of knowledge to suggest differential outcomes when compared to CBT or HL alone.