RESUMEN
Background: Percutaneous approaches to the spine have been explored recently for various procedures, including transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. It is known that facet decortication leads to higher rates of fusion, but effective percutaneous approaches have not been well documented. There are a set of instruments used in the cervical spine for percutaneous decortication, the CORUS™ Spinal System-X (DI# 00852776006508), which may be useful in this setting. Our aim was to investigate the feasibility of decorticating the lumbar facet joints with these instruments in cadavers to aid in minimally invasive lumbar fusion. Methods: We performed percutaneous facet joint decortication at each facet joint in the lumbar spine in two adult cadavers. We tested varying degrees of laterality for entry points and angulation for access at each level to optimize the innovative procedure. Results: When using the CORUS™ Spinal System-X to obtain percutaneous access for facet decortication in the lumbar spine, we successfully dissected down to the facet joint without neurovascular injury. At the L1-L2 and L2-L3 levels, access was best obtained at 4 cm from midline with an angulation of 10°. At the L3-L4 and L4-L5 level, access was best obtained at 4 cm from midline with an angulation of 20°. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that percutaneous lumbar facet joint decortication is feasible with the CORUS™ Spinal System-X instruments, and warrants further, comparative study in the clinical setting.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Endovascular mechanical thrombectomy (EVT) has become the standard of care treatment for both intravenous tissue plasminogen activator eligible and ineligible patients presenting with an acute ischemic stroke due to a large vessel occlusion (LVO) within 24 h. Due to limited access to EVT, patients typically present to a non-EVT-capable center and are transferred to a larger, EVT-capable center. Quality improvement work has focused on improving this process to shorten the time to definitive recanalization of the affected vessel. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 98 consecutive patients who were transferred from an outside institution to our Comprehensive Stroke Center from July 2019 to September 2021. Thirty-nine of these patients had a diagnosed LVO at the transferring center on computed tomography angiography and were transferred directly to the angiography suite (DAT) whereas 59 patients were transferred to our Emergency Department for further imaging (EDT). Three of the patients in the DAT group did not undergo thrombectomy as there was no LVO identified on catheter angiography and were excluded from the study. RESULTS: Demographic and medical comorbidities were similar between the two groups. The DAT group had more severe strokes on presentation compared to the EDT group as measured by the National Institute of Health Stroke Severity (17.5 vs. 15, P = 0.048). Last known well (LKW) to arrival time in the angiography suite was significantly shorter in the DAT group (280 min vs. 474 min, P = 0.002). Patients in the DAT group were revascularized faster than the EDT group relative to LKW (320 min vs. 534 min, P < 0.001) while door-to-groin puncture and door-to-revascularization rates were similar. Modified Rankin score, incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and need for decompressive hemicraniectomy were similar between the two groups. Successful revascularization as measured by thrombolysis in cerebral infarction score occurred at a higher rate in the DAT group but was not statistical significance (97% vs. 85%, P = 0.055). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: DAT resulted in safe EVT compared to EDT with significant improvement in LKW to angiography suite presentation and subsequent vessel recanalization. Patients who underwent DAT experienced similar functional outcomes compared to EDT despite experiencing more severe strokes.
RESUMEN
Low-grade gliomas (LGGs) are optimally treated with up-front maximal safe surgical resection, typically defined as maximizing the extent of tumor resection while minimizing neurologic risks of surgery. Supratotal resection of LGG may improve outcomes beyond gross total resection by removing tumor cells invading beyond the tumor border as defined on MRI. However, the evidence regarding supratotal resection of LGG, in terms of impact on clinical outcomes, such as overall survival and neurologic morbidities, remains unclear. Authors independently searched the PubMed, Medline, Ovid, CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), and Google Scholar databases for studies evaluating overall survival, time to progression, seizure outcomes, and postoperative neurologic and medical complications of supratotal resection/FLAIRectomy of WHO-defined LGGs. Papers in languages other than English, lacking full-text availability, evaluating supratotal resection of WHO-defined high-grade gliomas only, and nonhuman studies were excluded. After literature search, reference screening, and initial exclusions, 65 studies were screened for relevancy, of which 23 were evaluated via full-text review, and 10 were ultimately included in the final evidence review. Studies were evaluated for quality using the MINORS criteria. After data extraction, a total of 1301 LGG patients were included in the analysis, with 377 (29.0%) undergoing supratotal resection. The main measured outcomes were extent of resection, pre- and postoperative neurological deficits, seizure control, adjuvant treatment, neuropsychological outcomes, ability to return to work, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Overall, low- to moderate-quality evidence was supportive of aggressive, functional boundary-based resection of LGGs due to improvements in progression-free survival and seizure control. The published literature provides a moderate amount of low-quality evidence supporting supratotal surgical resection along functional boundaries for low-grade glioma. Among patients included in this analysis, the occurrence of postoperative neurological deficits was low, and nearly all patients recovered within 3 to 6 months after surgery. Notably, the surgical centers represented in this analysis have significant experience in glioma surgery in general, and supratotal resection specifically. In this setting, supratotal surgical resection along functional boundaries appears to be appropriate for both symptomatic and asymptomatic low-grade glioma patients. Larger clinical studies are needed to better define the role of supratotal resection in LGG.