Rabies postexposure prophylaxis: What the U.S. emergency medicine provider needs to know.

Approximately 55,000 patients per year in the United States are exposed to potentially rabid animals and receive rabies postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) and these patients commonly present to the emergency department (ED) for wound care and PEP. Despite the number of rabies exposures seen in EDs each year, there appears to be a knowledge gap among health care providers with regard to prescribing and administering rabies PEP. The following review aims to bridge that knowledge gap by discussing the importance of obtaining a comprehensive exposure history to determine the category of the encounter, the type of animal, and the location of the bite and of consulting outside expert resources to determine whether the rabies PEP series is indicated. In addition, this article will discuss dosing, administration, and schedule of the rabies vaccine and human rabies immune globulin to ensure patients are fully protected from developing rabies. Lastly, this article discusses the potential cost associated with rabies PEP and provides information on managing this barrier.

Evaluation of anti-Xa levels in patients with venous thromboembolism within the first 48 h of anticoagulation with unfractionated heparin.

Background: A 2019 study by Prucnal and colleagues found that the majority of patients treated with unfractionated heparin for pulmonary embolism did not maintain therapeutic activated partial thromboplastin time levels during the first 48 h of therapy. Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of an institution's unfractionated heparin dosing protocol to achieve and maintain therapeutic anti-Xa levels within the first 48 h of therapy in patients with venous thromboembolism. Methods: This retrospective study included 205 patients from May 2016 through September 2020. Patients were divided into two cohorts: bolus plus infusion (N = 89) and infusion only (N = 116). The primary objective was to determine the number of patients who achieved at least one therapeutic level. Results: Overall, 200 patients (97.6%) had at least one therapeutic level with no statistically significant difference between cohorts (p = 0.65). No more than 60% of patients achieved a therapeutic level at any of the 6-h intervals throughout the timeframe. The median time to the first therapeutic level in the overall group was 12.8 h with no statistically significant difference between the bolus plus infusion and infusion-only cohorts (13.3 h versus 12.7 h, respectively, p = 0.48). Conclusions: Most patients were able to achieve at least one therapeutic level within the first 48 h, but fewer were able to maintain therapeutic levels. Further studies are warranted to determine whether alternative dosing strategies would yield consistent achievement of therapeutic levels and affect patient-oriented outcomes.