RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To investigate associations between nutrition risk (determined by SCREEN-II) and malnutrition (diagnosed by the GLIM criteria) with five-year mortality in Maori and non-Maori of advanced age. DESIGN: A longitudinal cohort study. SETTING: Bay of Plenty and Lakes regions of New Zealand. PARTICIPANTS: 255 Maori; 400 non-Maori octogenarians. MEASUREMENTS: All participants were screened for nutrition risk using the Seniors in the Community: Risk Evaluation for Eating and Nutrition (SCREEN-II). Those at high nutrition risk (SCREEN-II score <49) had the Global Leadership Initiative in Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria applied to diagnose malnutrition or not. Demographic, physical and health characteristics were obtained by trained research nurses using a standardised questionnaire. Five-year mortality was calculated from Government data. The association of nutrition risk (SCREEN-II) and a malnutrition diagnosis (GLIM) with five-year mortality was examined using logistic regression and cox proportional hazard models of increasing complexity. RESULTS: 56% of Maori and 46% of non-Maori participants had low SCREEN-II scores indicative of nutrition risk. The prevalence of GLIM diagnosed malnutrition was lower for both Maori and non-Maori (15% and 19% of all participants). Approximately one-third of participants (37% Maori and 32% non-Maori) died within the five-year follow-up period. The odds of death for both Maori and non-Maori was significantly lower with greater SCREEN II scores (better nutrition status), (OR (95% CI); 0.58 (0.38, 0.88), P < 0.05 and 0.53 (0.38, 0.75), P < 0.001, respectively). GLIM diagnosed malnutrition was not significantly associated with five-year mortality for Maori (OR (95% CI); 0.88 (0.41, 1.91), P >0.05) but was for non-Maori. This association remained significant after adjustment for other predictors of death (OR (95% CI); 0.50 (0.29, 0.86), P< 0.05). Reduced food intake was the only GLIM criterion predictive of five-year mortality for Maori (HR (95% CI); 10.77 (4.76, 24.38), P <0.001). For non-Maori, both aetiologic and phenotypic GLIM criteria were associated with five-year mortality. CONCLUSION: Nutrition risk, but not malnutrition diagnosed by the GLIM criteria was significantly associated with mortality for Maori. Conversely, both nutrition risk and malnutrition were significantly associated with mortality for non-Maori. Appropriate phenotypic criteria for diverse populations are needed within the GLIM framework.
Asunto(s)
Liderazgo , Desnutrición , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Humanos , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Longitudinales , Nueva Zelanda/epidemiología , Desnutrición/diagnóstico , Desnutrición/epidemiología , Estado Nutricional , Evaluación NutricionalRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Dietary intake information is key to understanding nutrition-related outcomes. Intake changes with age and some older people are at increased risk of malnutrition. Application, difficulties, and advantages of the 24-hour multiple pass recall (24hr-MPR) dietary assessment method in three cohorts of advanced age in the United Kingdom (UK) and New Zealand (NZ) is described. PARTICIPANTS: The Newcastle 85+ study (UK) recruited a single year birth cohort of people aged 85 years during 2006-7. LiLACS NZ recruited a 10-year birth cohort of Maori (indigenous New Zealanders) aged 80-90 years and a single year birth cohort of non-Maori aged 85 years in 2010. MEASUREMENTS: Two 24hr-MPR were conducted on non-consecutive days by trained assessors. Pictorial resources and language were adapted for the New Zealand and Maori contexts. Detailed methods are described. RESULTS: In the Newcastle 85+ study, 805 (93%) participants consented to the 24-MPR, 95% of whom completed two 24hr-MPR; in LiLACS NZ, 218 (82%) consented and 203 (76%) Maori and 353 (90%) non-Maori completed two 24hr-MPR. Mean time to complete each 24hr-MPR was 22 minutes in the Newcastle 85+ study, and 45 minutes for Maori and 39 minutes for non-Maori in LiLACS NZ. Dietary assessment of participants residing in residential care and those requiring proxy respondents were successfully included in both studies. Most participants (83-94%) felt that data captured by the 24hr-MPR reflected their usual dietary intake. CONCLUSIONS: Dietary assessment using 24hr-MPR was successful in capturing detailed dietary data including information on portion size and time of eating for over 1300 octogenarians in the UK and New Zealand (Maori and non- Maori). The 24hr-MPR is an acceptable method of dietary assessment in this age group.
Asunto(s)
Dieta , Ingestión de Alimentos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Humanos , Estudios de Cohortes , Dieta/etnología , Ingestión de Alimentos/etnología , Nueva Zelanda , Reino Unido , Pueblo MaoríRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To establish the prevalence of high nutrition risk and associated health and social risk factors for New Zealand Maori and non-Maori in advanced age. DESIGN: A cross sectional analysis of inception cohorts to LiLACS NZ. SETTING: Bay of Plenty and Lakes region of the North Island, New Zealand. PARTICIPANTS: 255 Maori and 400 non- Maori octogenarians. MEASUREMENTS: Nutrition risk was assessed using a validated questionnaire Seniors in the Community: Risk Evaluation for Eating and Nutrition (SCREEN II). Demographic, social, physical and health characteristics were established using an interviewer administered questionnaire. Health related quality of life (HRQOL) was assessed with the SF-12, depressive symptoms using the GDS-15. RESULTS: Half (49%) of Maori and 38% of non-Maori participants were at high nutrition risk (SCREEN II score <49). Independent risk factors were for Maori younger age (p=0.04), lower education (p=0.03), living alone (p<0.001), depressive symptoms (p=0.01). For non- Maori high nutrition risk was associated with female gender (p=0.005), living alone (p=0.002), a lower physical health related quality of life (p=0.02) and depressive symptoms (p=0.002). CONCLUSION: Traditional risk factors apply to both Maori and non-Maori whilst education as indicative of low socioeconomic status is an additional risk factor for Maori. High nutrition risk impacts health related quality of life for non-Maori. Interventions which socially facilitate eating are especially important for women and for Maori to maintain cultural practices and could be initiated by routine screening.