RESUMEN
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in the setting of blunt traumatic visceral injury remains controversial. A total of 181 patients underwent splenic artery embolization (SAE) and began pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis at a median time of 59.5 hours (interquartile range, 46 hours). Six patients required splenectomy for rebleed. Fifty-one patients underwent SAE but did not receive anticoagulation therapy since they were considered low risk for VTE, and no splenectomies were performed (P = 1). Multivariate analysis showed no increased risk of need for splenectomy after beginning anticoagulation within 24 hours after SAE (P =.441). This study suggests that patients found to be at a high VTE risk should be considered for thromboprophylaxis within 24 hours after SAE.
Asunto(s)
Embolización Terapéutica , Tromboembolia Venosa , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Embolización Terapéutica/efectos adversos , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Bazo , Arteria Esplénica/diagnóstico por imagen , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiología , Tromboembolia Venosa/prevención & controlRESUMEN
Objective To investigate demographics, clinical patterns and outcomes of rapid response reviews in hospital, reviewing indications for and outcomes of rapid response reviews initiated for clinical concern and to understand the role of clinical concern in identifying the deteriorating patient and at-risk patient populations. Method This was a retrospective analysis of General Medical inpatients at Alfred Hospital from 1 January 2018 to 31 July 2020. Data extraction from electronic medical records identified patients who had a rapid response review during admission. Demographic and clinical data, investigations and clinical outcomes from rapid response reviews were investigated. Comparisons were performed using χ 2 or Fisher's exact test where appropriate. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for factors associated with rapid response reviews for clinical concern and clinical outcomes. Results There were 10 797 admissions of 7409 individual patients. There were 2359 rapid response reviews during the study period, occurring in 13% of admissions. Patients were majority female (50.4%), and the median age was 79 ± 17.6 years. Rapid response reviews were for cardiovascular (46.8%), respiratory (25.3%) and neurological (14.3%) indications. A total of 11% of rapid response reviews (n = 258) were for clinical concern. Inpatient falls accounted for a significant proportion of rapid response reviews for clinical concern. Reviews were more common in older patients, those admitted after-hours, and patients with disabilities. The latter group weremore likely to have rapid response reviews for clinical concern. Rapid response reviews initiated for clinical concern were more likely than those initiated for standard criteria to change patients' clinical status, particularly the withdrawal of active management. Conclusions Rapid response reviews for clinical concern are important triggers to identify clinical deterioration in vulnerable patients. Reviews were initiated for clinical concern were more likely than those initiated for standard criteria to result in a change in patients' resuscitation status and care trajectory. Clinician concern, even when prompting review for parameters outside of standard clinical review criteria, remains an important factor in recognising the deteriorating patient.
Asunto(s)
Pacientes , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Friedreich ataxia (FRDA) is a multisystem neurodegenerative disorder and the most common hereditary ataxia. Dysphagia (swallowing impairment) is present in 98% of individuals with FRDA and is characterized by lingual and pharyngeal dysfunction (manifesting in impaired bolus preparation and transfer, and post-swallow residue in the mouth and pharynx), delayed swallow initiation, and entry of material into the airway (penetration/aspiration). Dysphagia severity correlates with disease severity and duration however no longitudinal studies describe changes in function in FRDA. The aim of this study was to investigate the progression of dysphagia in FRDA over one year. Fifty-nine individuals with FRDA and confirmed dysphagia were recruited and 23 of them underwent a second assessment 12 months later. Assessments of swallowing related quality of life, oral motor function (Frenchay Dysarthria Assessment 2nd Ed [FDA-2]) and functional swallowing via videofluoroscopy were conducted. Trials of thin liquid, puree and biscuit were interpreted using the Bethlehem Assessment Scale and the Penetration-Aspiration Scale by two blinded raters. Data from the videofluoroscopy revealed a decline in tongue function, pharyngeal clearance and cricopharyngeal function on solid food. However, severity of penetration/aspiration did not increase. Swallowing-related quality of life and oral-motor function remained stable. A decline in function was observed at three anatomical sites considered important for safe and effective swallowing (tongue, pharyngeal, and cricopharyngeal). However, these deficits did not translate into any meaningful functional decline in swallowing related health over 12 months for individuals with FRDA.