RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The Critical Care Societies Collaborative included not ordering diagnostic tests at regular intervals as one of their Choosing Wisely initiatives. A reduction in unnecessary chest radiographs (CXRs) can help reduce exposure to radiation and eliminate health care waste. We aimed to reduce daily screening CXRs in a pediatric ICU (PICU) by 20% from baseline within 4 months of implementation of CXR criteria. METHODS: All intubated patients in the PICU were included in this quality improvement project. Patients with tracheostomies were excluded. We developed criteria delineating which patients were most likely to benefit from a daily screening CXR, and these criteria were discussed for each patient on rounds. Patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, on high-frequency oscillatory ventilation, or on high support on conventional mechanical ventilation were included as needing a daily screening CXR. We tracked the percentage of intubated subjects receiving a screening CXR as an outcome measure. Unplanned extubations and the number of non-screening CXRs per intubated subject were followed as balancing measures. RESULTS: The percentage of intubated subjects receiving a daily screening CXR was reduced from 79% to 31%. There was no increase in frequency of unplanned extubations or number of non-screening CXRs. With an estimated subject charge of roughly $270 and hospital cost of $54 per CXR, this project led to an estimated $300,000 in patient charge savings and $60,000 in hospital cost savings. CONCLUSIONS: Adopting criteria to delineate which patients are most likely to benefit from screening CXRs can lead to a reduction in the percentage of intubated patients receiving screening CXRs without appearing to increase harm.
Asunto(s)
Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Radiografía Torácica , Niño , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico , Radiografía , Cuidados CríticosRESUMEN
Patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) commonly have dependent atelectasis and heterogeneous lung disease. Due to the heterogenous lung volumes seen, the application of positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) can have both beneficial and deleterious effects. Alternating supine and prone positioning may be beneficial in ARDS by providing more homogenous distribution of PEEP and decreasing intrapulmonary shunt. In pediatrics, the pediatric acute lung injury and consensus conference (PALICC) recommended to consider it in severe pediatric ARDS (PARDS). Manually prone positioning patients can be burdensome in larger patients. In adults, the use of rotational beds has eased care of these patients. There is little published data about rotational bed therapy in children. Therefore, we sought to describe the use of a rotational bed in children with PARDS. We performed a retrospective case series of children who utilized a rotational bed as an adjunctive therapy for their PARDS. Patient data were collected and analyzed. Descriptive statistical analyses were performed and reported. Oxygenation indices (OI) pre- and post-prone positioning were analyzed. Twelve patients with PARDS were treated with a rotational bed with minimal adverse events. There were no complications noted. Three patients had malfunctioning of their arterial line while on the rotational bed. Oxygenation indices improved over time in 11 of the 12 patients included in the study while on the rotational bed. Rotational beds can be safely utilized in pediatric patients. In larger children with PARDS, where it may be more difficult to perform a manual prone position, use of a rotational bed can be considered a safe alternative.