Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods ; 56(2): 256-64, 2007.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17618130

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The evaluation of drug disposition properties of chemical entities in drug discovery research typically involves the conduct of pharmacokinetic studies in rodents that requires blood sampling over several time points, preferably without disrupting the physiological status of the animals. Several blood withdrawal methods have been employed throughout the industry, yet these methods have not been comprehensively evaluated with regard to their effects on pharmacokinetic profiles of the drug investigated to recommend best practices. METHODS: In this paper, the pharmacokinetics of six marketed drugs from four distinct therapeutic classes were compared using tail-vein, femoral-artery cannula-, and retro-orbital sinus bleeding techniques. The marketed drugs used in these studies were pentoxifylline, gemfibrozil, glipizide, methotrexate, clonidine, and fluoxetine. RESULTS: Following oral administration, peak plasma concentration (C(max)), and area under the curve (AUC(0-24)) values for all compounds were not significantly different with the tail-vein method when compared to cannula- or retro-orbital sinus bleeding, except for fluoxetine and gemfibrozil for which minor, but statistically significant differences were observed. The effect of arterial versus venous tail-bleeding on the pharmacokinetics of pentoxifylline indicated no statistical differences in either C(max) or AUC(0-24) values. However, for fluoxetine, higher exposures were observed with tail arterial than venous sampling (2-fold with respect to C(max) and 1.7-fold with respect to AUC(0-24), p<0.05). DISCUSSION: The observed differences with fluoxetine may be due to its pharmacological effects on thermoregulatory responses that influence tail blood flow, a hypothesis that remains to be tested. Based on these observations, we recommend the tail-bleeding technique for pharmacology or toxicology exposure and F% studies, particularly in early discovery work. Retro-orbital bleeding is controversial and is no longer considered a humane method. Cannula-bleeding, especially coupled with automated blood-collection techniques, has become the most efficient way for pharmaceutical industry to perform rat bioavailability studies.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Periférico/métodos , Drogas en Investigación/farmacocinética , Órbita/irrigación sanguínea , Cola (estructura animal)/irrigación sanguínea , Administración Oral , Animales , Área Bajo la Curva , Disponibilidad Biológica , Recolección de Muestras de Sangre/métodos , Clonidina/administración & dosificación , Clonidina/sangre , Clonidina/farmacocinética , Drogas en Investigación/administración & dosificación , Drogas en Investigación/química , Fluoxetina/administración & dosificación , Fluoxetina/sangre , Fluoxetina/farmacocinética , Gemfibrozilo/administración & dosificación , Gemfibrozilo/sangre , Gemfibrozilo/farmacocinética , Glipizida/administración & dosificación , Glipizida/sangre , Glipizida/farmacocinética , Semivida , Inyecciones Intravenosas , Masculino , Metotrexato/administración & dosificación , Metotrexato/sangre , Metotrexato/farmacocinética , Estructura Molecular , Pentoxifilina/administración & dosificación , Pentoxifilina/sangre , Pentoxifilina/farmacocinética , Ratas , Ratas Sprague-Dawley , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Factores de Tiempo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA