Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 34
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Ann Intern Med ; 165(7): 473-481, 2016 10 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27479614

RESUMEN

Background: Trends in the prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) are important for health care policy and planning. Objective: To update trends in CKD prevalence. Design: Repeated cross-sectional study. Setting: NHANES (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey) for 1988 to 1994 and every 2 years from 1999 to 2012. Participants: Adults aged 20 years or older. Measurements: Chronic kidney disease (stages 3 and 4) was defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 15 to 59 mL/min/1.73 m2, estimated with the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation from calibrated serum creatinine measurements. An expanded definition of CKD also included persons with an eGFR of at least 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 and a 1-time urine albumin-creatinine ratio of at least 30 mg/g. Results: The unadjusted prevalence of stage 3 and 4 CKD increased from the late 1990s to the early 2000s. Since 2003 to 2004, however, the overall prevalence has largely stabilized (for example, 6.9% prevalence in 2003 to 2004 and in 2011 to 2012). There was little difference in adjusted prevalence of stage 3 and 4 CKD overall in 2003 to 2004 versus 2011 to 2012 after age, sex, race/ethnicity, and diabetes mellitus status were controlled for (P = 0.26). Lack of increase in CKD prevalence since the early 2000s was observed in most subgroups and with an expanded definition of CKD that included persons with higher eGFRs and albuminuria. Limitation: Serum creatinine and albuminuria were measured only once in each person. Conclusion: In a reversal of prior trends, there has been no appreciable increase in the prevalence of stage 3 and 4 CKD in the U.S. population overall during the most recent decade. Primary Funding Source: American Society of Nephrology Foundation for Kidney Research Student Scholar Grant Program, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and National Institutes of Health.


Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Albuminuria , Creatinina/sangre , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas Nutricionales , Prevalencia , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/diagnóstico , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
2.
AJPM Focus ; 3(3): 100215, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38638940

RESUMEN

Introduction: The risk of diabetes begins at a lower BMI among Asian adults. This study compares the prevalence of diabetes between the U.S. and China by BMI. Methods: Data from the 2015-2017 China Nutrition and Health Surveillance (n=176,223) and the 2015-2018 U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (n=4,464) were used. Diagnosed diabetes was self-reported. Undiagnosed diabetes was no report of diagnosed diabetes and fasting plasma glucose ≥126 mg/dL or HbA1c ≥6.5%. Predicted age-adjusted prevalence estimates by BMI were produced using sex- and country-specific logistic regression models. Results: In China, the age-adjusted prevalence of total diabetes was 7.8% (95% CI=7.4%, 8.3%), lower than the 14.6% (95% CI=13.1%, 16.3%) in the U.S. The prevalence of diagnosed diabetes was also lower in China than in the U.S. There were no statistically significant differences in the prevalence of undiagnosed diabetes between China and the U.S. The distribution of BMI in China was lower than in the U.S., and the predicted prevalence of total diabetes was similar between China and the U.S. when comparing adults with the same BMI. The predicted prevalence of undiagnosed diabetes was higher in China than in the U.S. for both men and women, and this disparity increased with BMI. When comparing adults at the same BMI, there was little difference in the prevalence of total diabetes, but diagnosed diabetes was lower in China than in the U.S., and undiagnosed was higher. Conclusions: Although differences in BMI appear to explain nearly all of the differences in total diabetes prevalence in the 2 countries, not all factors that are associated with diabetes risk have been investigated.

3.
Am J Epidemiol ; 178(1): 38-45, 2013 Jul 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23703888

RESUMEN

Previous estimates of the prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in the US population relied on measures of liver enzymes, potentially underestimating the burden of this disease. We used ultrasonography data from 12,454 adults who participated in the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, conducted in the United States from 1988 to 1994. We defined NAFLD as the presence of hepatic steatosis on ultrasonography in the absence of elevated alcohol consumption. In the US population, the rates of prevalence of hepatic steatosis and NAFLD were 21.4% and 19.0%, respectively, corresponding to estimates of 32.5 (95% confidence interval: 29.9, 35.0) million adults with hepatic steatosis and 28.8 (95% confidence interval: 26.6, 31.2) million adults with NAFLD nationwide. After adjustment for age, income, education, body mass index (weight (kg)/height (m)²), and diabetes status, NAFLD was more common in Mexican Americans (24.1%) compared with non-Hispanic whites (17.8%) and non-Hispanic blacks (13.5%) (P = 0.001) and in men (20.2%) compared with women (15.8%) (P < 0.001). Hepatic steatosis and NAFLD were also independently associated with diabetes, with insulin resistance among people without diabetes, with dyslipidemia, and with obesity. Our results extend previous national estimates of the prevalence of NAFLD in the US population and highlight the burden of this disease. Men, Mexican Americans, and people with diabetes and obesity are the most affected groups.


Asunto(s)
Hígado Graso/epidemiología , Encuestas Nutricionales/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Población Negra/estadística & datos numéricos , Hígado Graso/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Humanos , Hígado/diagnóstico por imagen , Masculino , Americanos Mexicanos/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico , Prevalencia , Factores Sexuales , Factores Socioeconómicos , Ultrasonografía , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven
4.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 11(9): 1183-1190.e2, 2013 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23416328

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND & AIMS: A genome-wide association study associated 5 genetic variants with hepatic steatosis (identified by computerized tomography) in individuals of European ancestry. We investigated whether these variants were associated with measures of hepatic steatosis (HS) in non-Hispanic white (NHW), non-Hispanic black, and Mexican American (MA) participants in the US population-based National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III, phase 2. METHODS: We analyzed data from 4804 adults (1825 NHW, 1442 non-Hispanic black, and 1537 MA; 51.7% women; mean age at examination, 42.5 y); the weighted prevalence of HS was 37.3%. We investigated whether ultrasound-measured HS, with and without increased levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), or level of ALT alone, was associated with rs738409 (patatin-like phospholipase domain-containing protein 3 [PNPLA3]), rs2228603 (neurocan [NCAN]), rs12137855 (lysophospholipase-like 1), rs780094 (glucokinase regulatory protein [GCKR]), and rs4240624 (protein phosphatase 1, regulatory subunit 3b [PPP1R3B]) using regression modeling in an additive genetic model, controlling for age, age-squared, sex, and alcohol consumption. RESULTS: The G allele of rs738409 (PNPLA3) and the T allele of rs780094 (GCKR) were associated with HS with a high level of ALT (odds ratio [OR], 1.36; P = .01; and OR, 1.30; P = .03, respectively). The A allele of rs4240624 (PPP1R3B) and the T allele of rs2228603 (NCAN) were associated with HS (OR, 1.28; P = .03; and OR, 1.40; P = .04, respectively). Variants of PNPLA3 and NCAN were associated with ALT level among all 3 ancestries. Some single-nucleotide polymorphisms were associated with particular races or ethnicities: variants in PNPLA3, NCAN, GCKR, and PPP1R3B were associated with NHW and variants in PNPLA3 were associated with MA. No variants were associated with NHB. CONCLUSIONS: We used data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III to validate the association between rs738409 (PNPLA3), rs780094 (GCKR), and rs4240624 (PPP1R3B) with HS, with or without increased levels of ALT, among 3 different ancestries. Some, but not all, associations between variants in NCAN, lysophospholipase-like 1, GCKR, and PPP1R3B with HS (with and without increased ALT level) were significant within subpopulations.


Asunto(s)
Proteínas Adaptadoras Transductoras de Señales/genética , Hígado Graso/genética , Hígado Graso/patología , Lipasa/genética , Proteínas de la Membrana/genética , Polimorfismo Genético , Proteína Fosfatasa 1/genética , Adulto , Anciano , Población Negra , Hígado Graso/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Frecuencia de los Genes , Estudios de Asociación Genética , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Humanos , Masculino , Americanos Mexicanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas Nutricionales , Ultrasonografía , Estados Unidos , Población Blanca , Adulto Joven
5.
Clin Chem ; 59(4): 675-83, 2013 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23315482

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Albuminuria, defined as urine albumin/creatinine ratio (ACR) ≥30 mg/g, is a diagnostic component of chronic kidney disease (CKD). National estimates of ACR and CKD prevalence have been based on single random urine samples. Although 2 urine samples or a first morning void are known to produce different estimates of ACR, the impact of differing urine sampling schemes on nationally estimated rates of CKD is unknown. METHODS: In 2009-2010, the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) participants provided 2 untimed urine samples for sequential ACR measurement: an initial random urine collected in the NHANES mobile examination center and a subsequent first morning void collected at home. Rates of albuminuria were calculated in the overall population and broken down by demographics, diagnosed diabetes and hypertension status, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). RESULTS: Overall, 43.5% of adults with increased ACR (≥30 mg/g) in a random urine also had increased ACR in a first morning urine. This percentage was higher among individuals ≥50 years old (48.9%), males (53.3%), participants with diagnosed diabetes (56.3%) and hypertension (51.5%), and eGFR <60 mL/min/1.72m(2) (56.9%). The use of confirmed increased ACR (defined as the presence of ACR ≥30 mg/g in both samples taken within 10 days) to define CKD resulted in a lower overall prevalence (11.6%) than first morning urine (12.7%) or random spot urine only (15.2%). CONCLUSIONS: ACR measured on random urine samples appears to overestimate the prevalence of albuminuria compared to first morning urine collections.


Asunto(s)
Albuminuria/orina , Encuestas Nutricionales , Adulto , Albuminuria/fisiopatología , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia
6.
Med Sci Sports Exerc ; 53(11): 2455-2464, 2021 11 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34115727

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This study aimed to present age- and sex-specific percentiles for daily wrist-worn movement metrics in US youth and adults. This metric represents a summary of all recorded movement, regardless of the purpose, context, or intensity. METHODS: Wrist-worn accelerometer data from the combined 2011-2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey cycles and the 2012 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey National Youth Fitness Survey were used for this analysis. Monitor-Independent Movement Summary units (MIMS-units) from raw triaxial accelerometer data were used. We removed the partial first and last assessment days and days with ≥5% nonwear time. Participants with ≥1 valid day were included. Mean MIMS-units were calculated across all valid days. Percentile tables and smoothed curves of daily MIMS-units were calculated for each age and sex using the Generalized Additive Models for Location Shape and Scale. RESULTS: The analytical sample included 14,705 participants age ≥3 yr. The MIMS-unit activity among youth was similar for both sexes, whereas adult females generally had higher MIMS-unit activity than did males. Median daily MIMS-units peaked at age 6 yr for both sexes (males, 20,613; females, 20,706). Lowest activity was observed for males and females 80+ yr of age: 8799 and 9503, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Population referenced MIMS-unit percentiles for US youth and adults are a novel means of characterizing total activity volume. By using MIMS-units, we provide a standardized reference that can be applied across various wrist-worn accelerometer devices. Further work is needed to link these metrics to activity intensity categories and health outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Acelerometría/instrumentación , Ejercicio Físico , Monitores de Ejercicio , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valores de Referencia , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estados Unidos , Muñeca , Adulto Joven
7.
Ethn Dis ; 20(3): 244-50, 2010.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20828097

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To examine racial/ethnic differences in the relationship between weight perception and weight management behaviors among overweight and obese adults. PARTICIPANTS: The study examined a nationally representative sample of 11,319 non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black and Mexican American overweight and obese adults aged > or = 20 years from the 1999-2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. DESIGN: Body mass index (BMI, defined as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) was used to categorize overweight (25 < or = BMI < 30) and obesity (BMI > or = 30). Measured height and weight were used to calculate BMI. Subjects reported self-perception of weight status (correct perception and misperception) and weight management behaviors over the previous 12 months (trying to lose weight, trying not to gain weight, and having a desired weight goal). Weight perception stratified logistic regression was used to model odds of weight management behavior by race/ethnicity. RESULTS: Among overweight and obese non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, and Mexican American adults, correct weight perception was positively associated with weight management behavior. In multiple logistic regression models, overweight non-Hispanic Blacks with a weight misperception were less likely to have tried to lose weight (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = .7; 95% confidence interval [Cl] = .5,1.0) or to have tried not to gain weight (aOR = .7; 95% CI = .5,1.0) compared to overweight non-Hispanic Whites with a weight misperception. Among the obese with a misperception, non-Hispanic Blacks were less likely to desire to weigh less compared to non-Hispanic Whites (aOR = .5; 95% CI = .3,.9). CONCLUSIONS: Weight perception was associated with weight management behaviors, and this relationship varied by race/ethnicity. Weight perception may need to be addressed among overweight and obese individuals to increase appropriate weight management behaviors, particularly among minority communities.


Asunto(s)
Negro o Afroamericano/etnología , Peso Corporal/etnología , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Americanos Mexicanos/etnología , Percepción del Peso , Población Blanca/etnología , Adulto , Negro o Afroamericano/psicología , Estatura/etnología , Índice de Masa Corporal , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Americanos Mexicanos/psicología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas Nutricionales , Estados Unidos , Población Blanca/psicología
8.
Prev Chronic Dis ; 6(4): A114, 2009 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19754990

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: We examined the control of modifiable risk factors among a national sample of diabetic people with and without lower extremity disease (LED). METHODS: The sample from the 1999-2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey consisted of 948 adults aged 40 years or older with diagnosed diabetes and who had been assessed for LED. LED was defined as peripheral arterial disease (ankle-brachial index <0.9), peripheral neuropathy (> or = 1 insensate area), or presence of foot ulcer. Good control of modifiable risk factors, based on American Diabetes Association recommendations, included being a nonsmoker and having the following measurements: hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) less than 7%, systolic blood pressure less than or equal to 130 mm Hg, diastolic blood pressure less than or equal to 80 mm Hg, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol greater than 50 mg/dL, and body mass index (BMI) between 18.5 kg/m(2) and 24.9 kg/m(2). RESULTS: Diabetic people with LED were less likely than were people without LED to have recommended levels of HbA1c (39.3% vs 53.5%) and HDL cholesterol (29.7% vs 41.1%), but there were no differences in systolic or diastolic blood pressure, BMI classification, or smoking status between people with and without LED. Control of some risk factors differed among population subgroups. Notably, among diabetic people with LED, non-Hispanic blacks were more likely to have improper control of HbA1c (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 2.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-3.9), systolic blood pressure (AOR = 1.9; 95% CI, 1.1-3.2), and diastolic blood pressure (AOR = 2.6; 95% CI, 1.1-5.8), compared with non-Hispanic whites. CONCLUSION: Control of 2 of 6 modifiable risk factors was worse in diabetic adults with LED compared with diabetic adults without LED. Among diabetic people with LED, non-Hispanic blacks had worse control of 3 of 6 risk factors compared with non-Hispanic whites.


Asunto(s)
Neuropatías Diabéticas/epidemiología , Extremidad Inferior/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Etnicidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas Nutricionales , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
9.
NCHS Data Brief ; (319): 1-8, 2018 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30248004

RESUMEN

Diabetes is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States (1-3). Diabetes can be present but undiagnosed, meaning that a person can have diabetes but not report having ever been told by a doctor or health professional that they have the condition. Type 2 diabetes can progress over an extended time period with gradual, often unnoticed, changes occurring before diagnosis. If left unmanaged, diabetes may contribute to serious health outcomes including neuropathy, nephropathy, retinopathy, coronary artery disease, stroke, and peripheral vascular disease (4). This report presents the prevalence of total, diagnosed, and undiagnosed diabetes in U.S. adults in 2013-2016.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Anciano , Diabetes Mellitus/etnología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Grupos Raciales , Distribución por Sexo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
10.
Ethn Dis ; 17(3): 529-35, 2007.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17985509

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Control of blood glucose levels reduces vascular complications among people with diabetes, but less than half of the adults with diabetes in the United States are achieving good glycemic control. This study examines 1999-2002 national data on the association between race/ethnicity and glycemic control among adults with previously diagnosed diabetes. DESIGN: We analyzed data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999-2002, a cross-sectional survey of a nationally representative sample of the non-institutionalized civilian US population. Participants were non-pregnant adults, 20 years or older, with a previous diagnosis of diabetes, and who had participated in both the interview and examination in NHANES 1999-2002 (N=843). Glycemic control was determined by levels of glycosylated hemoglobin (A1C). We compared glycemic control by race/ethnicity and potential confounders including measures of socioeconomic status, obesity, healthcare access and diabetes treatment. RESULTS: Overall, 44% of adults with previously diagnosed diabetes had good glycemic control (A1C levels < 7%). Mexican Americans and non-Hispanic Blacks were less likely to achieve good control (35.4% and 36.9%, respectively) compared with non-Hispanic Whites (48.6%). After multivariable adjustment for measures of socioeconomic status, obesity, healthcare access and utilization and diabetes treatment, differences in glycemic control by race/ethnicity remained. CONCLUSION: Glycemic control is low among all racial/ethnic groups, but is lower among non-Hispanic Blacks and Mexican Americans. These results provide guidance for public health workers and health professionals in targeting programs to improve glycemic control among adults with diagnosed diabetes in the United States.


Asunto(s)
Glucemia/análisis , Diabetes Mellitus/etnología , Adulto , Anciano , Población Negra , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus/terapia , Femenino , Hemoglobina Glucada , Hispánicos o Latinos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas Nutricionales , Obesidad , Oportunidad Relativa , Grupos Raciales , Clase Social , Estados Unidos
11.
Diabetes Care ; 29(6): 1263-8, 2006 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16732006

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the prevalences of diagnosed and undiagnosed diabetes, and impaired fasting glucose (IFG) in U.S. adults during 1999-2002, and compare prevalences to those in 1988-1994. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) contains a probability sample of adults aged > or =20 years. In the NHANES 1999-2002, 4,761 adults were classified on glycemic status using standard criteria, based on an interview for diagnosed diabetes and fasting plasma glucose measured in a subsample. RESULTS: The crude prevalence of total diabetes in 1999-2002 was 9.3% (19.3 million, 2002 U.S. population), consisting of 6.5% diagnosed and 2.8% undiagnosed. An additional 26.0% had IFG, totaling 35.3% (73.3 million) with either diabetes or IFG. The prevalence of total diabetes rose with age, reaching 21.6% for those aged > or =65 years. The prevalence of diagnosed diabetes was twice as high in non-Hispanic blacks and Mexican Americans compared with non-Hispanic whites (both P < 0.00001), whereas the prevalence of undiagnosed diabetes was similar by race/ethnicity, adjusted for age and sex. The prevalence of diagnosed diabetes was similar by sex, but prevalences of undiagnosed diabetes and IFG were significantly higher in men. The crude prevalence of diagnosed diabetes rose significantly from 5.1% in 1988-1994 to 6.5% in 1999-2002, but the crude prevalences were stable for undiagnosed diabetes (from 2.7 to 2.8%) and IFG (from 24.7 to 26.0%). Results were similar after adjustment for age and sex. CONCLUSIONS: Although the prevalence of diagnosed diabetes has increased significantly over the last decade, the prevalences of undiagnosed diabetes and IFG have remained relatively stable. Minority groups remain disproportionately affected.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Intolerancia a la Glucosa/epidemiología , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Estado Nutricional , Adulto , Anciano , Población Negra/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricos
12.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract ; 127: 80-88, 2017 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28319805

RESUMEN

AIMS: To determine (1) the prevalence of SubD states among adults with diabetes, and (2) whether evidence exists of an independent association between diabetes status and SubD, controlling for selected confounders. METHODS: Data from the 2007-2012 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys were combined to estimates of depressive states by diabetes status among the noninstitutionalized U.S. adult population, and to assess the association of diabetes status and depressive states using a polytomous logistic regression model. RESULTS: An estimated 17%, or 3.7 million, of U.S. adults with diabetes (diagnosed and undiagnosed) met criteria for either mD or ssD. The majority of SubD cases with diabetes were found to be ssD (10.1%) compared with mD (6.9%). After controlling for the effects of age, sex, race and ethnicity, education, body mass index, and poverty as covariates, an independent association persists between diagnosed diabetes and each SubD grouping (ssD: OR=1.82, CIs 1.33, 2.47; mD: OR=1.95, CIs 1.39, 2.74) compared with respondents having no diabetes. No association was found between depression and undiagnosed diabetes or prediabetes compared with those having no diabetes. CONCLUSION: Milder forms of depression such as ssD and mD are more extant than major depressive episodes among adults with diabetes. The odds that an adult with diagnosed diabetes meets the criteria for ssD or mD are higher by 80% and 95%, respectively, after controlling for age, sex, race and ethnicity, education, body mass index, and poverty factors when compared against adults with no diabetes.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/etiología , Diabetes Mellitus/psicología , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas Nutricionales , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
13.
J Altern Complement Med ; 12(8): 805-12, 2006 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17034287

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) has increased in recent years. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the use of CAM among people with diagnosed chronic diseases. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis was used. SETTING: The 2002 National Health Interview Survey was the setting. PATIENTS: Participants were representative of the noninstitutionalized U.S. population 18 years and older. MEASUREMENTS: Respondents answered questions about use of CAM and physician-diagnosed arthritis, cancer, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and lung disease. RESULTS: Adults with diagnosed chronic diseases are more likely to use CAM compared to adults with none of the reported chronic diseases. Adults with arthritis alone were most likely to report ever use of CAM (59.6%) followed by adults with cancer or lung disease alone or two or more chronic diseases (55%), adults with cardiovascular disease (46.4%), and adults with no chronic diseases (43.6%) and diabetes alone (41.4%). Adults with chronic diseases were also more likely to report use of CAM in the past 12 months (32% to 43.3%), followed by adults with none of these chronic diseases (32%), and adults with diabetes alone (26.2%). Less than 30% of CAM users in the past 12 months reported talking to their healthcare professional about CAM use. LIMITATIONS: Information about CAM use is based on self-report. CONCLUSIONS: Use of CAM, particularly biologically based CAM therapies, is common and is more likely to be used by those with chronic diseases.


Asunto(s)
Terapias Complementarias/estadística & datos numéricos , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Artritis/terapia , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/terapia , Enfermedad Crónica/terapia , Diabetes Mellitus/terapia , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Enfermedades Pulmonares/terapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/terapia , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
14.
Diabetes Care ; 28(5): 1035-40, 2005 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15855563

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare the pregnancy experience among women with and without gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) using a nationally representative survey. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We analyzed data from the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth conducted by National Center for Health Statistics on 3,088 women age 15-44 years with at least one pregnancy between 1991 and 1995 to compare demographics, fecundity, and pregnancy experience by GDM (n = 116) or nondiabetes (n = 2,969) status. RESULTS: Among women with a pregnancy during 1991-1995, 3.6% reported GDM history. Women with GDM were older at age of delivery (31.8 years) than women without diabetes (29.0 years, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the groups by race/ethnicity. Compared with women without diabetes, women with gestational diabetes were more likely to report being currently surgically sterile (20.4 vs. 32.6%) or having impaired fecundity (12.6 vs. 19.7%, P < 0.001). GDM patients were more likely to have had a caesarean section than those without diabetes (31.7 vs. 20.9%, P = 0.02) and were more likely to report at least one of six additional nonroutine medical complications during pregnancy than nondiabetic patients (48.8 vs. 17.1%, P < 0.001). The odds ratio of a maternal medical complication during pregnancy for women with GDM compared with nondiabetic women, after adjusting for age at pregnancy and nongestational hypertension, was 4.3 (95% CI 2.7-6.8). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that pregnancies in women with GDM are more likely to be associated with maternal medical complications compared with pregnancies in women without diabetes.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Gestacional/epidemiología , Resultado del Embarazo/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Cesárea/estadística & datos numéricos , Recolección de Datos , Femenino , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Infertilidad Femenina/epidemiología , Modelos Logísticos , Edad Materna , Paridad , Embarazo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
15.
Bone ; 82: 9-15, 2016 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25576672

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: We examined the diabetes-fracture relationship by race/ethnicity, including the link between pre-diabetes and fracture. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We used Medicare- and mortality-linked data for respondents aged 65years and older from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) and NHANES 1999-2004 for three race/ethnic groups: non-Hispanic whites (NHW), non-Hispanic blacks (NHB), and Mexican Americans (MA). Diabetes was defined as diagnosed diabetes (self-reported) and diabetes status: diagnosed and undiagnosed diabetes (positive diagnosis or hemoglobin A1c (A1C)≥6.5%); pre-diabetes (no diagnosis and A1C between 5.7% and 6.4%); and no diabetes (no diagnosis and A1C<5.7%). Non-skull fractures (n=750) were defined using published algorithms. Hazards ratios (HRs) were calculated using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: The diabetes-fracture relationship differed significantly by race/ethnicity (pinteraction<0.05). Compared to those without diagnosed diabetes, the HRs for those with diagnosed diabetes were 2.37 (95% CI 1.49-3.75), 1.87 (95% CI 1.02-3.40), and 1.22 (95% CI 0.93-1.61) for MA, NHB, and NHW, respectively, after adjusting for significant confounders. HRs for diagnosed and undiagnosed diabetes were similar to those for diagnosed diabetes alone. Pre-diabetes was not significantly related to fracture risk, however. Compared to those without diabetes, adjusted HRs for those with pre-diabetes were 1.42 (95% CI 0.72-2.81), and 1.20 (95% CI 0.96-1.51) for MA and NHW, respectively. There were insufficient fracture cases to examine detailed diabetes status in NHB. CONCLUSIONS: The diabetes-fracture relationship was stronger in MA and NHB. Pre-diabetes was not significantly associated with higher fracture risk, however.


Asunto(s)
Población Negra/etnología , Diabetes Mellitus/etnología , Fracturas Óseas/etnología , Americanos Mexicanos/etnología , Encuestas Nutricionales , Población Blanca/etnología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnóstico , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Fracturas Óseas/diagnóstico , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare/tendencias , Encuestas Nutricionales/tendencias , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
16.
Diabetes Care ; 27(7): 1591-7, 2004 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15220233

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Although lower-extremity disease (LED), which includes lower-extremity peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and peripheral neuropathy (PN), is disabling and costly, no nationally representative estimates of its prevalence exist. The aim of this study was to examine the prevalence of lower-extremity PAD, PN, and overall LED in the overall U.S. population and among those with and without diagnosed diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The analysis consisted of data for 2873 men and women aged >or=40 years, including 419 with diagnosed diabetes, from the 1999-2000 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. The main outcome measures consisted of the prevalence of lower-extremity PAD (defined as ankle-brachial index <0.9), PN (defined as >or=1 insensate area based on monofilament testing), and of any LED (defined as either PAD, PN, or history of foot ulcer or lower-extremity amputations). RESULTS: Of the U.S. population aged >or=40 years, 4.5% (95% CI 3.4-5.6) have lower-extremity PAD, 14.8% (12.8-16.8) have PN, and 18.7% (15.9-21.4) have any LED. Prevalence of PAD, PN, and overall LED increases steeply with age and is higher (P < 0.05) in non-Hispanic blacks and Mexican Americans than non-Hispanic whites. The prevalence of LEDs is approximately twice as high for individuals with diagnosed diabetes (PAD 9.5% [5.5-13.4]; PN 28.5% [22.0-35.1]; any LED 30.2% [22.1-38.3]) as the overall population. CONCLUSIONS: LED is common in the U.S. and twice as high among individuals with diagnosed diabetes. These conditions disproportionately affect the elderly, non-Hispanic blacks, and Mexican Americans.


Asunto(s)
Neuropatías Diabéticas/epidemiología , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Periférico/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Demografía , Etnicidad , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
17.
Public Health Rep ; 130(6): 643-54, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26556936

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: We estimated the prevalence of preventive aspirin and/or other antiplatelet medication use and the dosage of aspirin use in the U.S. adult population. METHODS: We conducted cross-sectional analyses of a representative sample (n=3,599) of U.S. adults aged ≥ 40 years from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2011-2012. RESULTS: In 2011-2012, one-third of U.S. adults aged ≥ 40 years reported taking preventive aspirin and/or other antiplatelet medications, 97% of whom indicated preventive aspirin use. Preventive aspirin use increased with age (from 11% of those aged 40-49 years to 54% of those ≥ 80 years of age, p<0.001). Non-Hispanic white (35%) and black (30%) adults were more likely to take preventive aspirin than non-Hispanic Asian (20%, p<0.001) and Hispanic (22%, p=0.013) adults. Adults with, compared with those without health insurance, and adults with ≥ 2 doctor visits in the past year, diagnosed diabetes, hypertension, or high cholesterol were twice as likely to take preventive aspirin. Among those with cardiovascular disease, 76% reported taking preventive aspirin and/or other antiplatelet medications, of whom 91% were taking preventive aspirin. Among adults without cardiovascular disease, 28% reported taking preventive aspirin. Adherence rates to medically recommended aspirin use were 82% overall, 91% for secondary prevention, and 79% for primary prevention. Among current preventive aspirin users, 70% were taking 81 milligrams (mg) of aspirin daily and 13% were taking 325 mg of aspirin daily. CONCLUSION: The vast majority of antiplatelet therapy is preventive aspirin use. A health-care provider's recommendation to take preventive aspirin is an important determinant of current preventive aspirin use.


Asunto(s)
Aspirina/uso terapéutico , Revisión de la Utilización de Medicamentos , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/administración & dosificación , Prevención Primaria , Prevención Secundaria , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos
18.
Am J Kidney Dis ; 42(2): 249-55, 2003 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12900805

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Persons with chronic kidney disease who need kidney replacement therapy to sustain life have health insurance. We examined whether young adults, women, blacks, less-educated persons, the poor, and persons residing in less populated areas receive treatment when health insurance is no longer a barrier. METHODS: We conducted a case-control study nested in the Second National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Mortality Study. Cases were persons treated with kidney replacement therapy determined by linkage to the end-stage renal disease treatment registry. Controls were untreated persons with kidney disease who died not appearing in the registry. RESULTS: During 12 to 16 years, 44 persons developed treated disease, and 145 persons, untreated disease. After adjustment for sex, age, education, population of residential area, and comorbid conditions in logistic regression analysis, younger versus older age and living in a highly populated versus less populated area were both independently associated with treatment (relative odds of treatment, 5.57; 95% confidence interval, 1.72 to 18.0; and 4.33; 95% confidence interval, 2.09 to 8.97, respectively). Race, sex, education, and poverty were not associated with less treatment. CONCLUSION: We found no disparity in life-saving chronic kidney disease treatment with regard to race or socioeconomic status in this population-based study. Less receipt of treatment by older adults may reflect greater comorbid disease or choices made by persons or their providers. Strategies to render treatment in less populated areas, including incentives to deliver care to such areas, should be encouraged.


Asunto(s)
Terapia de Reemplazo Renal/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/epidemiología , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Masculino , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pobreza , Sistema de Registros , Fumar/epidemiología , Factores Socioeconómicos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
19.
Am J Kidney Dis ; 42(2): 256-63, 2003 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12900806

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Atherosclerosis and chronic kidney disease (CKD) share several common antecedents. However, the association between inflammatory markers and incident CKD is unknown. METHODS: We determined risk for incident CKD, defined by treatment for kidney failure or death related to kidney disease, in 9,250 US adults aged 30 to 74 years who participated in the Second National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES II), a nationally representative prospective cohort study with 17 years of follow-up. RESULTS: After adjusting for age, race, sex, blood pressure, smoking, and body mass index, there was a graded positive association with increasing total white blood cell (WBC) count and risk for CKD (P for trend < 0.001; relative hazard (RH) highest versus lowest quartile, 2.34; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.30 to 4.19). This association remained statistically significant after adjusting further for the presence of diabetes and cardiovascular disease at baseline (RH, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.11 to 3.65). A similarly strong and graded association with incident CKD was observed for hypoalbuminemia after adjusting for age, race, sex, blood pressure, smoking, and body mass index (P for trend = 0.02; RH lowest versus highest quartile, 1.91; 95% CI, 0.89 to 4.07) and additionally adjusting for the presence of diabetes and cardiovascular disease at baseline (P for trend = 0.02; RH lowest versus highest, 2.05; 95% CI, 0.96 to 4.39). CONCLUSION: In a nationally representative sample of US adults, elevated WBC count and hypoalbuminemia were associated with future risk for CKD. These results support the hypothesis that systemic inflammation is an independent risk factor for CKD.


Asunto(s)
Hipoalbuminemia/epidemiología , Enfermedades Renales/epidemiología , Leucocitosis/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Arteriosclerosis/epidemiología , Biomarcadores , Enfermedad Crónica , Estudios de Seguimiento , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Inflamación/sangre , Inflamación/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Prospectivos , Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
20.
Am J Kidney Dis ; 39(3): 445-59, 2002 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11877563

RESUMEN

Microalbuminuria (MA) is associated with adverse health outcomes in diabetic and hypertensive adults. The prevalence and clinical significance of MA in nondiabetic populations is less clear. The purpose of this study was to generate national estimates of the prevalence of MA in the US population. Untimed urinary albumin concentrations (UACs) and creatinine concentrations were evaluated in a nationally representative sample of 22,244 participants aged 6 years and older. Persons with hematuria and menstruating or pregnant women were excluded from analysis. The percent prevalence of clinical proteinuria (UAC > or = 300 mg/L) was similar for males and females. However, the prevalence of MA (urinary albumin-creatinine ratio [ACR], 30 to 299 mg/g) was significantly lower in males (6.1%) compared with females (9.7%). MA prevalence was greater in children than young adults and increased continuously starting at 40 years of age. MA prevalence was greater in non-Hispanic blacks and Mexican Americans aged 40 to 79 years compared with similar-aged non-Hispanic whites. MA prevalence was 28.8% in persons with previously diagnosed diabetes, 16.0% in those with hypertension, and 5.1% in those without diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, or elevated serum creatinine levels. In adults aged 40+ years, after excluding persons with clinical proteinuria, albuminuria (defined as ACR > or = 30 mg/g) was independently associated with older age, non-Hispanic black and Mexican American ethnicity, diabetes, hypertension, and elevated serum creatinine concentration. MA is common, even among persons without diabetes or hypertension. Age, sex, race/ethnicity, and concomitant disease contribute to the variability of MA prevalence estimates.


Asunto(s)
Albuminuria/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Anciano , Albuminuria/etnología , Niño , Creatinina/sangre , Creatinina/orina , Estudios Transversales , Diabetes Mellitus/orina , Femenino , Humanos , Hipertensión/orina , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vigilancia de la Población , Prevalencia , Proteinuria/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Muestreo , Distribución por Sexo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA