FREQUENT SUBCLINICAL MACULAR CHANGES IN COMBINED BRAF/MEK INHIBITION WITH HIGH-DOSE HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE AS TREATMENT FOR ADVANCED METASTATIC BRAF MUTANT MELANOMA: Preliminary Results From a Phase I/II Clinical Treatment Trial.

PURPOSE: To assess the potential ocular toxicity of a combined BRAF inhibition (BRAFi) + MEK inhibition (MEKi) + hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) regime used to treat metastatic BRAF mutant melanoma. METHODS: Patients with stage IV metastatic melanoma and BRAF V600E mutations (n = 11, 31-68 years of age) were included. Treatment was with oral dabrafenib, 150 mg bid, trametinib, 2 mg/day, and HCQ, 400 mg to 600 mg bid. An ophthalmic examination, spectral domain optical coherence tomography, near-infrared and short-wavelength fundus autofluorescence, and static perimetry were performed at baseline, 1 month, and q/6 months after treatment. RESULTS: There were no clinically significant ocular events; there was no ocular inflammation. The only medication-related change was a separation of the photoreceptor outer segment tip from the apical retinal pigment epithelium that could be traced from the fovea to the perifoveal retina noted in 9/11 (82%) of the patients. There were no changes in retinal pigment epithelium melanization or lipofuscin content by near-infrared fundus autofluorescence and short-wavelength fundus autofluorescence, respectively. There were no inner retinal or outer nuclear layer changes. Visual acuities and sensitivities were unchanged. CONCLUSION: BRAFi (trametinib) + MEKi (dabrafenib) + HCQ causes very frequent, subclinical separation of the photoreceptor outer segment from the apical retinal pigment epithelium without inner retinal changes or signs of inflammation. The changes suggest interference with the maintenance of the outer retinal barrier and/or phagocytic/pump functions of the retinal pigment epithelium by effective MEK inhibition.

ENHANCED S-CONE SYNDROME: VISUAL FUNCTION, CROSS-SECTIONAL IMAGING, AND CELLULAR STRUCTURE WITH ADAPTIVE OPTICS OPHTHALMOSCOPY.

PURPOSE: To describe in detail the phenotype of a patient with enhanced S-cone syndrome. METHODS: We describe a 13-year-old boy who presented with blurred vision, vitreous cells, cystoid macular edema refractory to steroid treatment, and a negative uveitic workup. The patient underwent a complete ophthalmic examination, full-field electroretinograms (ffERG), automatic static perimetry and multimodal imaging with spectral domain optical coherence tomography, and adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (AOSLO). RESULTS: Spectral domain optical coherence tomography demonstrated cystoid macular edema and a hyperthick, delaminated midperipheral retina. Fluorescein angiography did not demonstrate macular leakage. Rod-mediated ffERGs were undetectable, and there was a supernormal response to short-wavelength stimuli compared with photopically matched longer wavelengths of light consistent with enhanced S-cone syndrome. Gene screening was positive for compound heterozygous mutations NR2E3: a known (c.119-2 A>C) and a novel (c.119-1G>A) mutation. By perimetry, sensitivities were normal or above normal for short-wavelength stimuli; there was no detectable rod-mediated vision. AOSLO demonstrated higher than normal cone densities in the perifoveal retina and evidence for smaller outer segment cone diameters. CONCLUSION: Evidence for supernumerary cones (at least twice the normal complement) by AOSLO and spectral domain optical coherence tomography was associated with supernormal S-cone sensitivities and electroretinogram responses confirming previous in vivo findings in postmortem human specimens. Smaller than normal cones in enhanced S-cone syndrome may represent "hybrid" photoreceptors analogous to the rd7/rd7 murine model of the disease.