A Case of Solitary Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome Leading to Chronic Small Bowel Obstruction Due to Intussusception From a Large Hamartomatous Polyp.

We report a case of a 33-year-old male who presented to the emergency department with a three-day history of severe diffuse abdominal pain associated with anorexia, nausea, and vomiting. Computed tomography (CT) imaging of the abdomen and pelvis revealed a long segment of intussusception in the proximal jejunum and a round lesion along the intussusception with punctate hyperdensities. The patient underwent a diagnostic laparoscopy converted to open small bowel resection and end-to-end anastomosis that demonstrated a pedunculated jejunal mass. The mass was removed, and the pathology revealed a hamartomatous polyp with features of Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (PJS). The patient did not have a family history, previous endoscopic findings, or physical exam findings such as mucocutaneous pigmentation that could be attributed to PJS.  Definitive diagnosis of solitary PJS-type hamartomatous polyps depends on histopathological findings. Genetic analysis for mutations of the PJS susceptible gene, STK11/LB1 located at 19p13.3, as well as loss of heterozygosity at that locus, have been used for the diagnosis of PJS. In patients with large pedunculated hamartomatous polyps, chronic intussusception can occur. If pathology reveals features of Peutz-Jeghers, but the patient lacks the characteristic mucocutaneous pigmentation, family history of PJS, or additional polyps within the GI tract, then solitary PJS may be suspected.

Small Bowel Follow-Through: Treatment for Small Bowel Obstruction or Delaying the Inevitable?

BACKGROUND: Over 400,000 patients are admitted annually for small bowel obstruction (SBO), of which 20-40% require operative intervention, representing more than 2.3 billion dollars in healthcare expenses. Recurrence of SBO increases with a longer duration of follow-up with up to 15-20% recurrence rates within a five-year period. Small bowel follow-through (SBFT) consisting of serial X-rays with oral contrast has been shown to decrease overall length of stay (LOS) in patients with adhesive SBO. The aim of this study is to determine if SBFT administered to patients with SBO decreases 30-day and up to five-year readmission rates secondary to recurrent SBO. METHODS: The institutional review board (IRB) approved a single institution retrospective study from 2010 to 2020 that included a total of 742 patients. These patients were organized into groups of those who received the SBFT <24 hours after admission (n=40), those who received the SBFT >24 hours (n=198), and the third group of patients who did not receive the SBFT (n=658). Readmission rates <30 days, 70 years along with BMI <25, 25-29.9, 30-34.9, 35-39.9, >40, as well as the number of intraabdominal surgeries, gender, and need for operative intervention during the admission were evaluated to assess for any associations with recurrence. Readmission within 30 days and up to five years were compared. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in recurrence rates between groups with SBFT <24 hours (p=0.338) or SBFT >24 hours (p=0.889) when compared to the no SBFT group. There was nearly a 48% chance of readmission for another episode of an SBO for patients who did not undergo an operative intervention. While patients who underwent operative intervention had around a 29% chance of having a subsequent episode of an SBO. This is consistent with a statistically significant decrease in one-year (p=0.027) recurrences in patients who underwent operative intervention. CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in recurrences with gender, most BMI groups, or in groups who underwent an SBFT. Operative intervention is associated with a statistically significant decrease in recurrence rates of SBO within one year of presentation.

Equal but Separate: The Slow Assimilation of Osteopathic Surgery Residents Two Years After the Unified Match.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to monitor the integration of general surgery residency programs before and after the 2020 unified match. We hypothesized that integration of osteopathic (DO) surgery residents would increase. DESIGN: We performed a retrospective cohort study of surgery residency programs between 2019 and 2021 utilizing data provided by the Association of American Medical Colleges. Program composition (2021) and changes in composition (2019-2021) were compared by program type. Multivariable logistic regression models assessed variables associated with DO presence (2021) and integration (2019-2021). SETTING: General surgery residency programs across the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Civilian surgery residencies that completed the 2019-2021 program survey. RESULTS: Out of 320 programs, DO residents were integrated at 69% (221/320), including 52% (63/122) university programs, 78% (101/129) university-affiliated programs and 83% (57/69) community programs (p < 0.01). Overall, 23 (8%) programs integrated DO residents from 2019 to 2021, and 9 (21%) ex-American Osteopathic Association programs integrated MD residents (both p < 0.01). The median number of DO residents was 1 (interquartile range, IQR 0-2) at university programs, 2 (IQR 1-7) at university-affiliated programs, and 5 (IQR 2-12) at community programs (p < 0.01). The median number of DO residents at all programs increased from 1 (IQR 0-5) to 2 (IQR 0-6) since 2019 (p < 0.01). Community (OR 2.6, p = 0.04), university-affiliated (OR 2.3, p = 0.02), and programs with DOs in 2019 (OR 19.0, p < 0.01) were associated with increased odds of DOs present in 2021, while DO faculty (OR 2.6, p = 0.02) was the only factor independently associated with integrating DOs after 2019. CONCLUSIONS: While some programs have integrated DO residents, progress is slow, median numbers of DO residents remain low, and familiarity with DOs is most associated with integration. We explore barriers to integration, and advance recommendations to eliminate potential disparities.