Rituximab blocks protective serologic response to influenza A (H1N1) 2009 vaccination in lymphoma patients during or within 6 months after treatment.

Cancer patients are often encouraged to receive seasonal influenza vaccination. The monoclonal antibody rituximab is widely used in treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. This results in a prolonged depletion of normal B cells, which might impair humoral responses. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether lymphoma patients undergoing rituximab-containing treatment regimens or having received such regimens within the past 6 months were able to mount protective antibody responses to the influenza A(H1N1) 2009 virus vaccine Pandemrix during the 2009 "swine flu" pandemic. Contrary to the control group, where 82% responded adequately to the vaccine, none of the 67 patients achieved protective antibody titers, suggesting that lymphoma patients receiving rituximab-containing regimens might not benefit from this vaccine. It is important that doctors who care for such patients are aware that they may fail to respond not only to the influenza vaccine, but also to other common vaccines.

[Primary treatment of ovarian cancer]. / Primaerbehandling av ovarialcancer.

BACKGROUND: Patients with epithelial ovarian cancer are often diagnosed with advanced disease; hence they have a generally poor survival rate. The main objective was to assess the clinical effectiveness of the four main treatment options in the primary treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer: i) adjuvant chemotherapy and/or adjuvant radiotherapy, ii) cytoreductive surgery, iii) neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced disease, and iv) postoperative chemotherapy in advanced disease. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The scientific literature was identified by searches in Medline, Embase and Cochrane CCTR and by additional manual searches. Using criteria defined by protocol, two reviewers assessed each study according to relevance, quality and validity. Among 2227 publications identified, 635 were read as full-text articles, and 90 studies were critically assessed as relevant publications. All included studies were systematised in three subgroups according to the quality of the study design in question and the validity of the results: high, moderate, or low. A total of 45 studies of high or moderate quality form the documentary basis for this review. RESULTS: Current data are inconclusive regarding the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy. Retrospective data show a survival advantage for patients who have had maximum cytoreductive surgery. The effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy is uncertain. Several questions remain unanswered despite wide acceptance of paclitaxel-carboplatin as the current standard in first-line treatment. INTERPRETATION: This systematic review demonstrates the need for more clinical studies.

[Survival after high-dose therapy with autologous stem cell support]. / Overlevelse etter høydosebehandling med autolog stamcellestøtte.

BACKGROUND: High-dose therapy with autologous stem cell support has been carried out in our hospital since 1996. We have recently collected survival data on patients who have undergone this procedure. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study population comprised 111 patients, 58 of whom had been diagnosed with multiple myeloma, 38 with various forms of malignant lymphoma, 11 with sarcoma and 4 with testicular cancer. RESULTS: Median survival from reinfusion of stem cells was 74.8 months for patients with myeloma, 47.8 months for patients with malignant lymphoma and 11.7 months for patients with sarcoma. Three-year survival was 72.2 % for myeloma patients and 54.8 % for lymphoma patients. While the survival slope decreased steadily throughout the study period for patients with multiple myeloma, it seemed to level out after approximately 18 months for patients with malignant lymphomas. INTERPRETATION: Our data on myeloma patients show survival comparable to previously published data. For malignant lymphoma patients, our data support the assumption that high-dose therapy has the potential for cure.

Pre-emptive treatment with rituximab of molecular relapse after autologous stem cell transplantation in mantle cell lymphoma.

PURPOSE: Minimal residual disease (MRD) is predictive of clinical progression in mantle-cell lymphoma (MCL). According to the Nordic MCL-2 protocol we prospectively analyzed the efficacy of pre-emptive treatment using rituximab to MCL patients in molecular relapse after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). PATIENTS AND MATERIALS: MCL patients enrolled onto the study, who had polymerase chain reaction (PCR) detectable molecular markers and underwent ASCT, were followed with serial PCR assessments of MRD in consecutive bone marrow and peripheral blood samples after ASCT. In case of molecular relapse with increasing MRD levels, patients were offered pre-emptive treatment with rituximab 375 mg/m(2) weekly for 4 weeks. RESULTS: Of 160 MCL patients enrolled, 145 underwent ASCT, of whom 78 had a molecular marker. Of these, 74 were in complete remission (CR) and four had progressive disease after ASCT. Of the CR patients, 36 underwent a molecular relapse up to 6 years (mean, 18.5 months) after ASCT. Ten patients did not receive pre-emptive treatment mainly due to a simultaneous molecular and clinical relapse, while 26 patients underwent pre-emptive treatment leading to reinduction of molecular remission in 92%. Median molecular and clinical relapse-free survival after pre-emptive treatment were 1.5 and 3.7 years, respectively. Of the 38 patients who remain in molecular remission for now for a median of 3.3 years (range, 0.4 to 6.6 years), 33 are still in clinical CR. CONCLUSION: Molecular relapse may occur many years after ASCT in MCL, and PCR based pre-emptive treatment using rituximab is feasible, reinduce molecular remission, and may prevent clinical relapse.