[Aortic valve repair surgery : state of the art and clinical experience of the university hospital center of Liege]. / Chirurgie de réparation de la valve aortique : statut actuel de la technique et expérience clinique du CHU de Liège.

In the past 20 years, there has been a real development of aortic valve repair techniques with an increasing number of publications describing the long-term benefits of aortic valve repair in terms of survival, freedom from major adverse valve related-events and reoperations. Aortic valve repair can now be considered as a valuable alternative to prosthetic valve replacement in patients with dystrophic ascending aorta pathology associated or not to aortic insufficiency with pliable leaflets. In this paper, the authors describe the state of the art of aortic valve repair and present their clinical experience with aortic valve repair surgery in the university hospital center of Liege from April 2021 to September 2022.

Les techniques de réparation de la valve aortique se sont considérablement développées ces 20 dernières années. Plusieurs publications confirment les bénéfices à long terme de ces techniques en termes de survie, d'absence de complications majeures et de réinterventions pour récidive d'insuffisance aortique. La réparation de la valve aortique apparaît ainsi comme une véritable alternative au remplacement valvulaire aortique prothétique chez certains patients qui présentent une pathologie dystrophique de l'aorte ascendante associée ou non à une insuffisance aortique sur valve souple. Dans cet article, les auteurs parcourent la littérature actuelle sur le sujet et décrivent leur expérience clinique avec la chirurgie de réparation de la valve aortique au sein du centre hospitalier universitaire de Liège d'avril 2021 à septembre 2022.

Penetrating atherosclerosis aortic ulcer: a re-appraisal.

BACKGROUND: Penetrating aortic ulcer is a rare pathology, often clinically silent, but potentially fatal when manifesting as an acute aortic syndrome. It is more often detected in recent years, due to ageing of the population and more widespread use of computed tomography. A literature review aims to define the distinct disease entity of penetrating aortic ulcer. METHODS: Five recent cases of penetrating aortic ulcer, treated in authors' department are reported. A review of English-language medical literature from 1980 to 2015 was undertaken using PubMed and EMBASE databases, to identify studies reporting surgical (open and endovascular) treatment of penetrating aortic ulcer. RESULTS: From September 2013 to September 2015, five cases of acute aortic syndrome caused by a penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer of the descending thoracic aorta were observed in authors' department. This represents 9% of all acute aortic syndromes admitted to our hospital in the same period. All five patients benefitted from thoracic endovascular stent grafting with a 100% success rate. Natural history and optimal management of penetrating aortic ulcer are outlined according to the most recent insights. CONCLUSION: Penetrating aortic ulcer represents 2-7% of all acute aortic syndromes. Symptomatic penetrating aortic ulcer requires coverage by thoracic endovascular stent grafting according to the recent guidelines.

[18F] FDG PET/CT can improve the diagnostic accuracy for aortic endograft infection.

PURPOSE: Aortic endograft infection (EI) can result in potentially life-threatening vascular complications. Unfortunately, it is difficult to obtain a correct diagnosis at an early stage in many patients. This report aims at validating the use of [18F] FDG PET/CT imaging for suspected endograft infections in a prospectively collected cohort of patients treated with EVAR and TEVAR. MATERIALS AND METHODS: During a 14-year period, 366 patients required aortic stent graft. All procedures were performed electively, except for one patient. Among these 366 patients, eleven patients (3%) were suspected to have aortic EI. Contrast-enhanced CT and FDG PET/CT were performed in all 11 patients. Medical charts and imaging were analysed for these 11 cases, with initial positive CT. RESULTS: The final diagnosis of EI was established in seven (1,9%) based on clinical features, laboratory investigations and a significant [18F] FDG uptake in the aortic graft as well as the aortic wall. The median time from the initial EVAR/TEVAR to diagnosed infection was 180 days. During follow-up, the seven patients had a second PET/CT that was compared with the initial evaluation, decreased uptake was correlated with clinical improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Contemporary diagnostic imaging for a potentially lethal endograft infection lacks precision, this observational study illustrates the potential clinical value of [18F] FDG PET/CT in the management of aortic EI. [18F] FDG PET/CT constitutes an imaging modality able to confirm the diagnosis, monitor disease progression as well as the effect of pharmaceutical treatment and detect relapse.

[Disseminated intravascular coagulation: clinical and biological diagnosis]. / La coagulation intravasculaire disséminée : diagnostic clinique et biologique.

Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) is a syndrome characterized by the systemic activation of blood coagulation. Its pathophysiological mechanisms are complex and dependent on the underlying pathology, making the clinical and biological expression of quite variable DIC. Among the various biological parameters disrupted, most are not specific, and none of them allows in itself to make the diagnosis. All this does not facilitate the task of the practitioner for diagnosis of overt DIC, much less that of the non-overt DIC, early stage whose treatment would improve the prognosis. These considerations have led to develop scores, combining several parameters depending on their availability in daily practice, as well as their diagnostic relevance. Of all the scores, the ISTH (International society of thrombosis and hemostasis) remains the most used.