Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo de estudio
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Hand Surg Am ; 49(6): 541-556, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38703147

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Multiple interventions have been implemented to reduce opioid prescribing in upper extremity surgery. However, few studies have evaluated pain relief and patient satisfaction as related to failure of these protocols. We sought to evaluate the efficacy of limited and nonopioid ("opioid-sparing") regimens for upper extremity surgery as it pertains to patient satisfaction, pain experienced, and need for additional refills/rescue analgesia. METHODS: We aimed to systematically review randomized controlled trials of opioid-sparing approaches in upper extremity surgery. An initial search of studies evaluating opioid-sparing regimens after upper extremity surgery from the elbow distal yielded 1,320 studies, with nine meeting inclusion criteria. Patient demographics, surgery type, postoperative pain regimen, satisfaction measurements, and number of patients inadequately treated within each study were recorded. Outcomes were assessed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Nine randomized controlled trials with 1,480 patients were included. Six of nine studies (67%) reported superiority or equivalence of pain relief with nonopioid or limited opioid regimens. However, across all studies, 4.2% to 25% of patients were not adequately treated by the opioid-sparing protocols. This includes four of seven studies (57%) assessing number of medication refills or rescue analgesia reporting increased pill consumption, refills, or rescue dosing with limited/nonopioid regimens. Five of six studies (83%) reporting satisfaction outcomes found no difference in satisfaction with pain control, medication strength, and overall surgical experience using opioid-sparing regimens. CONCLUSIONS: Opioid-sparing regimens provide adequate pain relief for most upper extremity surgery patients. However, a meaningful number of patients on opioid-sparing regimens required greater medication refills and increased use of rescue analgesia. These patients also reported no difference in satisfaction compared with limited/nonopioid regimens. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic II.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides , Mano , Dolor Postoperatorio , Satisfacción del Paciente , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Humanos , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Mano/cirugía , Analgésicos no Narcóticos/uso terapéutico , Dimensión del Dolor , Manejo del Dolor/métodos
2.
Foot Ankle Int ; : 10711007241251819, 2024 May 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38798112

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive bunionectomy (MISB) has emerged as a popular approach to treat symptomatic hallux valgus deformity. Although previous studies focused on distal foot width changes postsurgery, this research introduces a novel midshaft measurement to evaluate proximal transverse midfoot width, aiming for a comprehensive understanding of foot changes post-MISB. METHODS: A retrospective review of 44 HV patients from an institutional registry was conducted. Demographic data, surgical details, radiographs, and foot width measurements were collected. Changes in hallux valgus angle (HVA) and intermetatarsal angle (IMA) were also measured. RESULTS: Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) demonstrated good to excellent interobserver reliability (all ICCs > 0.70) for all measurements. MISB resulted in a consistent reduction in distal foot width (P < .001). These reductions correlated with changes in HVA and IMA, suggesting that the extent of deformity correction influenced distal foot width: distal bone width decreased an average of 8 mm, P < .001). However, midshaft bony width increased an average of 4 mm, P < .001). Changes in midshaft foot width showed no correlation with HVA or IMA alterations. CONCLUSION: We found in this cohort of 44 patients that MISB for HV leads to an expected decrease in distal bony foot width but, on average, an increase in midshaft foot width. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparison of prospectively collected data.

3.
Cureus ; 14(4): e24341, 2022 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35607561

RESUMEN

Introduction When performing total knee arthroplasty (TKA), surgeons may use either the mechanical alignment (MA) or the kinematic alignment (KA) to guide implant placement and joint balancing. By measuring preoperative and postoperative patellar height (PH), surgeons can predict knee stability after TKA. Improper PH is associated with knee instability which may complicate the postoperative course and lead to patient dissatisfaction or need for revision. The purpose of this study is to measure patellar height using the Insall-Salvati Index (ISI), Caton-Deschamps Index (CDI), and Blackburne-Peel Index (BPI) preoperatively and postoperatively in patients who underwent TKA with either MA or KA to assess for changes in patellar height. Methods We performed a retrospective eight-year review of 256 patients who underwent TKA with either MA or KA by a single surgeon at a single hospital site. We obtained demographic data, including gender, age, and BMI, via the electronic health record. Furthermore, we calculated the ISI, CDI, and BPI using necessary parameters from preoperative and postoperative radiographs. We used these measurements to assess any statistically significant difference in postoperative PH. Results The MA cohort consisted of 104 patients with an average age of 63 years and an average BMI of 34.1 kg/m2. The KA cohort included 152 patients with an average age of 64 years and an average BMI of 34.9 kg/m2.  For the MA population, the average postoperative score with ISI was 1.10 [1.05 to 1.16] (p < 0.001), with CDI was 1.05 [0.98 to 1.11] (p < 0.001), and with BPI was was 0.94 [0.89 to 0.99] (p < 0.001). While for the KA population, the average postoperative score with ISI was 1.03 [0.99 to 1.06] (p = 0.17), with CDI was 0.87 [0.82 to 0.91] (p = 0.15), and with BPI was 0.82 [0.78 to 0.86] (p = 0.34). Conclusion TKA with a KA has a statistically significant improvement in postoperative PH and better postoperative maintenance of preoperative PH. Improved PH may lead to increased patellofemoral stability and superior postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing TKA. Future studies should focus on whether differences in preoperative and postoperative PH measurements result in changes in clinical outcomes in patients with MA versus KA TKA.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA