Regulation of outer kinetochore assembly during meiosis I and II by CENP-A and KNL-2/M18BP1 in C. elegans oocytes.

During cell division, chromosomes build kinetochores that attach to spindle microtubules. Kinetochores usually form at the centromeres, which contain CENP-A nucleosomes. The outer kinetochore, which is the core attachment site for microtubules, is composed of the KMN network (Knl1c, Mis12c, and Ndc80c complexes) and is recruited downstream of CENP-A and its partner CENP-C. In C. elegans oocytes, kinetochores have been suggested to form independently of CENP-A nucleosomes. Yet kinetochore formation requires CENP-C, which acts in parallel to the nucleoporin MEL-28ELYS. Here, we used a combination of RNAi and Degron-based depletion of CENP-A (or downstream CENP-C) to demonstrate that both proteins are in fact responsible for a portion of outer kinetochore assembly during meiosis I and are essential for accurate chromosome segregation. The remaining part requires the coordinated action of KNL-2 (ortholog of human M18BP1) and of the nucleoporin MEL-28ELYS. Accordingly, co-depletion of CENP-A (or CENP-C) and KNL-2M18BP1 (or MEL-28ELYS) prevented outer kinetochore assembly in oocytes during meiosis I. We further found that KNL-2M18BP1 and MEL-28ELYS are interdependent for kinetochore localization. Using engineered mutants, we demonstrated that KNL-2M18BP1 recruits MEL-28ELYS at meiotic kinetochores through a specific N-terminal domain, independently of its canonical CENP-A loading factor activity. Finally, we found that meiosis II outer kinetochore assembly was solely dependent on the canonical CENP-A/CENP-C pathway. Thus, like in most cells, outer kinetochore assembly in C. elegans oocytes depends on centromeric chromatin. However, during meiosis I, an additional KNL-2M18BP1 and MEL-28ELYS pathway acts in a non-redundant manner and in parallel to canonical centromeric chromatin.

Recommended distances for physical distancing during COVID-19 pandemics reveal cultural connections between countries.

During COVID-19 pandemic several public health measures were implemented by diverse countries to reduce the risk of COVID-19, including social distancing. Here we collected the minimal distance recommended by each country for physical distancing at the onset of the pandemic and aimed to examine whether it had an impact on the outbreak dynamics and how this specific value was chosen. Despite an absence of data on SARS-CoV-2 viral transmission at the beginning of the pandemic, we found that most countries recommended physical distancing with a precise minimal distance, between one meter/three feet and two meters/six feet. 45% of the countries advised one meter/three feet and 49% advised a higher minimal distance. The recommended minimal distance did not show a clear correlation with reproduction rate nor with the number of new cases per million, suggesting that the overall COVID-19 dynamics in each country depended on multiple interacting factors. Interestingly, the recommended minimal distance correlated with several cultural parameters: it was higher in countries with larger interpersonal distance between two interacting individuals in non-epidemic conditions, and it correlated with civil law systems, and with currency. This suggests that countries which share common conceptions such as civil law systems and currency unions tend to adopt the same public health measures.