Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo de estudio
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Int J Biol Macromol ; 126: 262-272, 2019 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30584935

RESUMEN

Chitosan (CS), possess enormous properties, being biodegradable, biocompatible, and antimicrobial. CS could be formulated and casted into different forms including 2D films, hydrogels, and nanoparticles. Chitosan-based nanoparticles (CSNPs) showed countless interest as polymeric drug delivery system (DDS) with its improved bioavailability, and stability when compared with traditional DDS. Ciprofloxacin is a prescribed antibiotic for many diseases, but its efficiency was affected by antibacterial resistance. Therefore, in this study, CSNPs loaded with ciprofloxacin (Cipro/CSNPs) were prepared from CS isolated from desert locusts, beetles, honey bee exoskeletons, and shrimp shells were used as a standard control. CSNPs were formulated by ionic crosslinking method, then loaded with ciprofloxacin HCl, and characterized using particle size distribution, zeta potential, and drug entrapment efficiency. The release of ciprofloxacin from CSNPs was evaluated and its kinetic modelling was performed. Antibacterial activity of CSNPs was evaluated against Escherichia coli, Bacillus thuringiensis, Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and, Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) were determined and compared between chitosan sources. The Cipro/CSNPs results indicate that the highest antibacterial activity against E. coli and MRSA with MIC varying from 0.0043 to 0.01 µg/ml and from 0.07 to 0.14 µg/ml, respectively. In addition, CSNPs enhanced drug delivery, and allowed its controlled release.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología , Quitosano/química , Ciprofloxacina/farmacología , Insectos/química , Nanopartículas/química , Acetilación , Animales , Bacterias/efectos de los fármacos , Difusión , Liberación de Fármacos , Cinética , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Tamaño de la Partícula , Espectroscopía Infrarroja por Transformada de Fourier , Electricidad Estática , Factores de Tiempo , Difracción de Rayos X
2.
Int J Biol Macromol ; 82: 871-7, 2016 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26459168

RESUMEN

Chitin was extracted from four different local sources: the shrimp (Penaeus monodon), the desert locust (Schistocerca gregaria), the honey bee (Apis mellifera) and the beetles (Calosoma rugosa). Chitosan was then obtained by deacetylation of chitin and physicochemically characterized using the Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) and X-ray diffraction. The moisture content, water binding capacity, fats binding capacity, ash content were determined and chitosans morphology was visualized using the scanning electron microscope (SEM). The difference between the obtained chitosans from three insect sources and α-chitosan from shrimp in terms of crystallinity, fibrous structure was discussed.


Asunto(s)
Quitosano/química , Insectos/química , Acetilación , Animales , Quitina/química , Quitina/aislamiento & purificación , Quitosano/aislamiento & purificación , Egipto , Grasas/química , Espectroscopía Infrarroja por Transformada de Fourier , Agua/química , Difracción de Rayos X
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA