Establishing a regional registry for neonatal encephalopathy: impact on identification of gaps in practice.

BACKGROUND: Neonatal encephalopathy (NE) continues to be a significant risk for death and disability. To address this risk, regional guidelines were developed with the support of a malpractice insurance patient safety organization. A NE registry was also established to include 14 centers representing around 50% of deliveries in the state of Massachusetts. The aim of this study was to identify areas of variation in practice that could benefit from quality improvement projects. METHODS: This manuscript reports on the establishment of the registry and the primary findings to date. RESULTS: From 2018 to 2020, 502 newborns with NE were evaluated for Therapeutic Hypothermia (TH), of which 246 (49%) received TH, representing a mean of 2.91 per 1000 live births. The study reports on prenatal characteristics, delivery room resuscitation, TH eligibility screening, and post-natal management of newborns with NE who did and did not receive TH. CONCLUSIONS: The registry has allowed for the identification of areas of variation in clinical practices, which have guided ongoing quality improvement projects. The authors advocate for the establishment of local and regional registries to standardize and improve NE patient care. They have made the registry data collection tools freely available for other centers to replicate this work. IMPACT: Malpractice insurance companies can take an active role in supporting clinicians in establishing clinical practice guidelines and regional registries. Establishing a collaborative regional neonatal encephalopathy (NE) registry is feasible. Data Collection tools for a NE registry have been made publicly available to be adopted and replicated by other groups. Establishing a regional NE registry allowed for the identification of gaps in knowledge, variations in practice, and the opportunity to advance care through quality improvement projects.

Differences between early and late MRI in infants with neonatal encephalopathy following therapeutic hypothermia.

BACKGROUND: MRI is the gold standard test to define brain injury in infants with neonatal encephalopathy(NE). As imaging findings evolve considerably over the first week, early imaging may not fully reflect the final nature of the injury. This study aimed to compare day 4 versus second week MRI in infants with NE. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study including infants who received therapeutic hypothermia(TH) for NE and had two MRIs: early (≤7days) and late (>7days). MRIs were clinically reported and also reviewed by study investigators. RESULTS: 94infants with NE were included (40mild,49moderate,5severe). Twenty-four infants(26%) had a normal early scan of which 3/24(13%) had injury noted on repeat MRI. Seventy infants(74%) had abnormal findings noted on early MRI, of which 4/70(6%) had further evolution of injury while 11/70(16%) had complete resolution of findings. Applying a grading system resulted in a change of grade in 7 infants. CONCLUSION: In infants who received TH for NE, 19% had changes noted between their early and late MRIs. While the impact on predicting neurodevelopmental outcome was not studied, relying solely on early MRI may overestimate injury in a proportion of infants and miss injury in others. Combining early and late MRI allows for better characterization of injury. IMPACT: MRI is the gold standard tool to define brain injury in infants with NE, however, imaging findings evolve considerably over the first week of life. Most centers perform a single MRI on day 4 after rewarming. In our cohort, 19% of infants had a notable change in their MRI findings between early (within the first week) and late (beyond the first week) scans. Relying solely on early MRI may overestimate injury in a proportion of infants and miss injury in others. Combining early and late MRI following hypothermia allows for better characterization of brain injury.

Magnetic resonance venography to evaluate cerebral sinovenous thrombosis in infants receiving therapeutic hypothermia.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of cerebral sinovenous thrombosis (CSVT) in infants receiving therapeutic hypothermia for neonatal encephalopathy remains controversial. The aim of this study was to identify if the routine use of magnetic resonance venography (MRV) in term-born infants receiving hypothermia is associated with diagnostic identification of CSVT. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 291 infants who received therapeutic hypothermia from January 2014 to March 2020. Demographic and clinical data, as well as the incidence of CSVT, were compared between infants born before and after adding routine MRV to post-rewarming magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). RESULTS: Before routine inclusion of MRV, 209 babies were cooled, and 25 (12%) underwent MRV. Only one baby (0.5%) was diagnosed with CSVT in that period, and it was detected by structural MRI, then confirmed with MRV. After the inclusion of routine MRV, 82 infants were cooled. Of these, 74 (90%) had MRV and none were diagnosed with CSVT. CONCLUSION: CSVT is uncommon in our cohort of infants receiving therapeutic hypothermia for neonatal encephalopathy. Inclusion of routine MRV in the post-rewarming imaging protocol was not associated with increased detection of CSVT in this population. IMPACT: Cerebral sinovenous thrombosis (CSVT) in infants with NE receiving TH may not be as common as previously indicated. The addition of MRV to routine post-rewarming imaging protocol did not lead to increased detection of CSVT in infants with NE. Asymmetry on MRV of the transverse sinus is a common anatomic variant. MRI alone may be sufficient in indicating the presence of CSVT.

Differences in standardized neonatal encephalopathy exam criteria may impact therapeutic hypothermia eligibility.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic hypothermia (TH) is routinely provided to those with moderate or severe neonatal encephalopathy (NE). Subtle differences exist in the standardized exams used to define NE severity. We aimed to assess if an infant's TH eligibility status differed if they were evaluated using either the NICHD/Neonatal Research Network's (NICHD-NRN) or TOBY/British Association of Perinatal Medicine's (TOBY-BAPM) neurological exam. METHODS: Encephalopathic infants ≥36 weeks with evidence of perinatal asphyxia and complete documentation of the neurological exam <6 h of age were included. TH eligibility using the NICHD-NRN and TOBY-BAPM criteria was determined based upon the documented exams. RESULTS: Ninety-one encephalopathic infants were included. Despite good agreement between the two exams (κ = 0.715, p < 0.001), TH eligibility differed between them (p < 0.001). A total of 47 infants were deemed eligible by at least one method-46 using NICHD-NRN and 35 using TOBY-BAPM. Of the 12 infants eligible per NICHD-NRN, but ineligible per TOBY-BAPM, two developed electrographic seizures and seven demonstrated hypoxic-ischemic cerebral injury. CONCLUSIONS: Both the NICHD-NRN and TOBY-BAPM exams are evidence-based. Despite this, there is a significant difference in the number of infants eligible for TH depending on which exam is used. The NICHD-NRN exam identifies a greater proportion as eligible. IMPACT: There are subtle differences in the NICHD-NRN and TOBY-BAPM's encephalopathy exams used to determine eligibility for TH. This results in a significant difference in the proportion of infants determined to be eligible for TH depending on which encephalopathy exam is used. The NICHD-NRN encephalopathy exam identifies more infants as being eligible for TH than the TOBY-BAPM encephalopathy exam. This may result in different rates of cooling depending on which evidence-based neurological exam for evaluation of encephalopathy a center uses.

Therapeutic hypothermia for preterm infants 34-35 weeks gestational age with neonatal encephalopathy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the short-term outcomes and safety of therapeutic hypothermia (TH) for neonatal encephalopathy in preterm infants at 34-35 weeks of gestation. STUDY DESIGN: A matched retrospective cohort study of 20 preterm infants at 34-35 weeks of gestation and 40 infants at 36 weeks of gestation or more who received TH between the years 2015-2021. RESULT: Short-term outcomes of preterm infants at 34-35 weeks of gestation who received TH were comparable with infants at 36 weeks or more of gestation who received TH regarding seizures, intraventricular hemorrhage, blood transfusions, subcutaneous fat necrosis, brain injury on magnetic resonance imaging, and mortality. These findings were consistent when short-term outcomes were adjusted for birthweight. CONCLUSION: TH in preterm infants at 34-35 weeks of gestation is feasible and safe in our study population.

Growth trajectories and need for oral feeding support among infants with neonatal encephalopathy treated with therapeutic hypothermia.

OBJECTIVE: Identify feeding supports required among infants with neonatal encephalopathy and determine growth trajectories to 3 years. STUDY DESIGN: Single-center retrospective cohort study of 120 infants undergoing therapeutic hypothermia. Logistic regression and stratified analyses identified whether clinical factors, EEG-determined encephalopathy severity, and MRI-based brain injury predict feeding supports (nasogastric tube, oral feeding compensations) and growth. RESULTS: 50.8% of infants required feeding supports in the hospital, decreasing to 14% at discharge. Moderate-to-severe encephalopathy and basal ganglia injury predicted feeding support needs. Yet, 35% of mildly encephalopathic infants required gavage tubes. Growth trajectories approximated expected growth of healthy infants. CONCLUSION: Infants with neonatal encephalopathy-even if mild-frequently experience feeding difficulties during initial hospitalization. With support, most achieve full oral feeds by discharge and adequate early childhood growth. Clinical factors may help identify infants requiring feeding support, but do not detect all at-risk infants, supporting routine screening of this high-risk population.

Hypocapnia in early hours of life is associated with brain injury in moderate to severe neonatal encephalopathy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between hypocapnia within the first 24 h of life and brain injury assessed by a detailed MRI scoring system in infants receiving therapeutic hypothermia (TH) for neonatal encephalopathy (NE) stratified by the stage of NE. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective cohort study included infants who received TH for mild to severe NE. RESULTS: 188 infants were included in the study with 48% having mild and 52% moderate-severe NE. Infants with moderate-severe NE spent more time in hypocapnia (PCO2 ≤ 35 mmHg) and presented with more severe brain injury on MRI compared to mild cases. The MRI injury score increased by 6% for each extra hour spent in hypocapnic range in infants with moderate-severe NE. There was no association between hypocapnia and injury scores in mild cases. CONCLUSION: In infants with moderate-severe NE, the hours spent in hypocapnia was an independent predictor of brain injury.

Comparison of numerical and standard sarnat grading using the NICHD and SIBEN methods.

OBJECTIVE: The NICHD and SIBEN assessments are adapted from the Sarnat grade, and used to determine severity of neonatal encephalopathy (NE). We compare NICHD and SIBEN methods, and their ability to define a minimum threshold associated with significant cerebral injury. STUDY DESIGN: Between 2016 and 2019, 145 infants with NE (77-mild; 65-moderate; 3-severe) were included. NICHD and SIBEN grade and numerical scores were assigned. Kappa scores described agreement between methods, and ROC curves their ability to predict MR injury. RESULTS: Good agreement existed between grading systems (K = 0.86). SIBEN defined more infants as moderate, and less as mild, than NICHD (p < 0.001). Both numerical scores were superior to standard grades in predicting MR injury. CONCLUSION: Despite good agreement between methods, SIBEN defines more infants as moderate NE. Both numerical scores were superior to standard grade, and comparable to each other, in defining a minimum threshold for cerebral injury. Further assessment contrasting their predictive ability for long-term outcome is required.