Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Eur Spine J ; 19(2): 307-15, 2010 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20035357

RESUMEN

Cervical total disc replacement (CTDR) aims to decrease the incidence of adjacent segment disease through motion preservation in the operated disc space. Ongoing data collection and increasing number of studies describing heterotopic ossification (HO) resulting in decreased mobility of implants, forced us to carefully evaluate our long-term clinical and morphological results of patients with CTDR. We present the first 54 consecutive patients treated with 65 ProdiscC prostheses during a 12-month period (2/2004-3/2005). All patients signed an informed consent and were included in prospective long-term study approved by hospital ethical committee. The 1- and 2-year follow-up analysis were available for all patients included and 4-year results for 50 patients (60 implants). Clinical (neck disability index-NDI, visual analog scale-VAS) and radiological follow-up was conducted at 1-, 2- and 4-years after the procedure. The Mehren/Suchomel modification of McAfee scale was used to classify the appearance of HO. Mean preoperative NDI was 34.5%, VAS for neck pain intensity 4.6 and VAS for arm pain intensity 5.0. At 1-, 2- and 4-year follow-up, the mean NDI was 30.7, 27.2, and 30.4, mean VAS for neck pain intensity 2.5, 2.1 and 2.9 and mean VAS for arm pain intensity pain 2.2, 1.9 and 2.3, respectively. Significant HO (grade III) was present in 45% of implants and segmental ankylosis (grade IV) in another 18% 4 years after intervention. This finding had no clinical consequences and 92% of patients would undergo the same surgery again. Our clinical results (NDI, VAS) are comparable with fusion techniques. Although, advanced non-fusion technology is used, a significant frequency of HO formation and spontaneous fusion in cervical disc replacement surgery must be anticipated during long-term follow-up.


Asunto(s)
Vértebras Cervicales/cirugía , Discectomía/efectos adversos , Desplazamiento del Disco Intervertebral/complicaciones , Desplazamiento del Disco Intervertebral/cirugía , Osificación Heterotópica/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Adulto , Anquilosis/etiología , Anquilosis/patología , Anquilosis/fisiopatología , Vértebras Cervicales/patología , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Movimientos de la Cabeza/fisiología , Humanos , Fijadores Internos/efectos adversos , Desplazamiento del Disco Intervertebral/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor de Cuello/etiología , Dolor de Cuello/patología , Dolor de Cuello/fisiopatología , Osificación Heterotópica/patología , Osificación Heterotópica/fisiopatología , Dimensión del Dolor , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/patología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/fisiopatología , Rango del Movimiento Articular/fisiología , Recurrencia , Fusión Vertebral/efectos adversos , Estrés Mecánico , Tiempo , Factores de Tiempo , Soporte de Peso/fisiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA