Surgical treatment for locally advanced lower third rectal cancer after neoadjuvent chemoradiation with capecitabine: prospective phase II trial.

INTRODUCTION: Treatment of rectal cancer requires a multidisciplinary approach with standardized surgical, pathological and radiotherapeutic procedures. Sphincter preserving surgery for cancer of the lower rectum needs a long-course of neoadjuvant treatments to reduce tumor volume, to induce down-staging that increases circumferential resection margin, and to facilitate surgery. AIM: To evaluate the rate of anal sphincter preservation in low lying, resectable, locally advanced rectal cancer and the resectability rate in unresectable cases after neoadjuvent chemoradiation by oral Capecitabine. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This trial included 43 patients with low lying (4-7 cm from anal verge) locally advanced rectal cancer, of which 33 were resectable. All patients received preoperative concurrent chemoradiation (45 Gy/25 fractions over 5 weeks with oral capecitabine 825 mg/m2 twice daily on radiotherapy days), followed after 4-6 weeks by total mesorectal excision technique. RESULTS: Preoperative chemoradiation resulted in a complete pathologic response in 4 patients (9.3%; 95% CI 3-23.1) and an overall downstaging in 32 patients (74.4%; 95% CI 58.5-85). Sphincter sparing surgical procedures were done in 20 out of 43 patients (46.5%; 95% CI 31.5-62.2). The majority (75%) were of clinical T3 disease. Toxicity was moderate and required no treatment interruption. Grade II anemia occurred in 4 patients (9.3%, 95% CI 3-23.1), leucopenia in 2 patients (4.7%, 95% CI 0.8-17) and radiation dermatitis in 4 patients (9.3%, 95% CI 3-23.1) respectively. CONCLUSION: In patients with low lying, locally advanced rectal cancer, preoperative chemoradiation using oral capecitabine 825 mg/m2, twice a day on radiotherapy days, was tolerable and effective in downstaging and resulted in 46.5% anal sphincter preservation rate.

Impact of treatment-related toxicity on outcome of HCV-positive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in rituximab era.

UNLABELLED: NOVELTY AND IMPACT: This first study compares the survival of HCV-positive DLBCL treated with and without rituximab which showed in toxicity and the outcome. BACKGROUND: The effect of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection on prognosis and hepatic toxicity in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in the rituximab era is unclear. The treatment and the outcome of patients with DLBCL and HCV infection are still a matter of debate. METHODS: We analyzed 137 DLBCL patients positive to HCV, treated with chemotherapy regimens include cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) ± rituximab. Survival outcomes and hepatic toxicity were compared in DLBCL patients positive to HCV infection according to CHOP ± rituximab. RESULT: Our result showed that the group of patients treated with R-CHOP has significant high incidence of hepatic toxicity grade (3-4) (28 vs. 18%, P value 0.001) and worse progression-free survival (55 vs. 80%, P value 0.002) in comparison with the group treated with CHOP, and also there is significant difference between both groups in overall survival. This first study compares the survival of HCV-positive DLBCL treated with and without rituximab which showed significant differences. CONCLUSION: We conclude that HCV-positive patients with DLBCL treated with rituximab plus CHOP have high incidence in hepatic toxicity. Specific protocols evaluating antiviral therapy should be designed for these patients.