Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 13(5): 259-64, 1992 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1593108

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To investigate reported needlestick injuries in hospital workers from an adult learner theory perspective: identifying safe needle device knowledge and practice, and flaws in needle designs and management practices surrounding such problems. DESIGN: Exploratory descriptive study of reported needlestick injuries from hollow needled devices in a hospital. Injured healthcare workers were counseled via hospital protocol, then a survey was filled out containing no identifiers of individual or institution. SETTING: Seventeen Metropolitan Washington, DC, area hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: All workers reporting needlestick injuries during February 1-28, 1990. RESULTS: Seventy-two injuries were reported; there were no multiple injuries to any individual. Thirty-three (45.8%) were to registered nurses (RNs)-more than any other group of workers. Recapping accounted for a higher percentage than any other activity (10 sticks, 14.1%). Of workers incurring recapping injuries, 3 identified a knowledge of a one-handed spearing technique and did not practice it; 4 neither knew nor practiced it. Eighteen (25.0%) were to "down-stream" housekeepers and aides who did not use such devices in their practice. Disposable needle/syringes caused 49.3% of injuries; hypodermic needles on intravenous lines caused 16.9%. Of the needlesticks, 60.6% were after use and before disposal, 4.2% occurred as the worker was putting an item into a needlebox, and 9.9% occurred from needles protruding from inappropriate bags. Many injuries occurred in the first 2 hours of work after being off the previous day, on Sunday, and on Monday. CONCLUSIONS: Of nurses and medical technologists reporting knowledge of a spearing recapping technique, 97.3% suffered injury via other methods. This strongly suggests that knowledge leads to different action. Safer needled devices and needle-free systems would make a safer workplace. Further study is indicated to identify if and why the first two hours after returning to work on Sunday or Monday are risky for needlestick injuries. Management practices must ensure compliance to safe practice both by employees and related medical staff.


Asunto(s)
Lesiones por Pinchazo de Aguja/epidemiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Personal de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Gestión de Riesgos , Competencia Clínica , District of Columbia/epidemiología , Seguridad de Equipos , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de Tiempo
2.
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) ; 22(7): 550-3, 2010 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20627674
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA