RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Diabetes type 2 is more prevalent in people from ethnic minorities in the Netherlands, and outcomes of care are worse compared with other Dutch people. Dieticians experience difficulties in managing these groups in self-management and adherence to dietary advice. The aim of this study was to explore the views regarding a healthy diet and dietetic care among ethnic minority type 2 diabetes patients. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were held with 12 migrants with diabetes from Turkey, Morocco, Iraq and Curacao, who visited a dietician. Inclusion went on until saturation was reached. The interview guide was based on the Attitudes, Social influence and self-Efficacy (ASE) model and Kleinman's explanatory model of illness. Interviews were held in the language preferred by the respondent. Transcripts were coded and thematically analyzed. RESULTS: Several respondents expected a more rigorous, directive and technical approach of the dietician. All respondents acknowledged the importance of a healthy diet. What they considered healthy was determined by culturally influenced ideas about health benefits of specific foods. Important hindrances for dietary change were lack of self-efficacy and social support. Social influences were experienced both as supportive and a hindrance. CONCLUSIONS: Migrant diabetic patients' opinions about healthy food are determined by culturally influenced ideas rather than by dietary guidelines. Dutch dietary care is not tailored to the needs of these patients and should take into account migrants' expectations, cultural differences in dietary habits and specifically address the role of family.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/etnología , Emigrantes e Inmigrantes/psicología , Etnicidad/psicología , Grupos Minoritarios/psicología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Dieta/etnología , Relaciones Familiares/etnología , Femenino , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Motivación , Países Bajos , Cooperación del Paciente/etnología , Investigación Cualitativa , Automanejo , Apoyo SocialRESUMEN
Quality-adjusted life years are used in cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs). To calculate QALYs, a "utility" (0-1) is used for each health state induced or prevented by the intervention. We aimed to estimate the impact of quality of life (QoL) assumptions (utilities and durations of health states) on CEAs of cervical cancer screening. To do so, 12 alternative sets of utility assumptions were retrieved from published cervical cancer screening CEAs. Two additional sets were based on empirical QoL data that were integrally obtained through two different measures (SF-6D and EQ-5D) from eight groups of women (total n = 3,087), from invitation for screening to diagnosis with cervical cancer. Per utility set we calculated the number of quality-adjusted days lost (QADL) for each relevant health state in cervical cancer screening, by multiplying the study-specific assumed disutilities (i.e., 1-utility) with study-specific durations of the loss in QoL, resulting in 14 "QADL-sets." With microsimulation model MISCAN we calculated cost-effectiveness of 342 alternative screening programs (varying in primary screening test [Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vs. cytology], starting ages, and screening interval) for each of the 14 QADL-sets. Utilities used in CEAs appeared to differ largely. We found that ten QADL-sets from the literature resulted in HPV and two in cytology as preferred primary test. The SF-6D empirical QADL-set resulted in cytology and the EQ-5D one in HPV as preferred primary test. In conclusion, assumed utilities and health state durations determine cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening. Also, the measure used to empirically assess utilities can be crucial for CEA conclusions.
Asunto(s)
Tamizaje Masivo , Calidad de Vida , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/epidemiología , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Femenino , Humanos , Tamizaje Masivo/economía , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Modelos Teóricos , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Dutch residents of Turkish origin frequently utilize healthcare in Turkey. METHODS: To investigate their motives for doing so, we conducted a qualitative study among these healthcare users using semi-structured interviews. We complemented this with informal conversations with Turkish healthcare providers and observations at the registration offices and waiting rooms of outpatient clinics in several Turkish hospitals. RESULTS: Respondents believed their perceived needs for referral to specialist care and diagnostic assessments to quantify their health were not being met in the Netherlands. CONCLUSIONS: These mismatches in expectations of what constitutes "good care" led to dissatisfaction with Dutch primary care. Consequently, respondents utilized healthcare in Turkey if the opportunity arose, and were encouraged in this by their social networks. Establishing cross-border communication between healthcare providers is necessary, because there is currently no continuity of care for cross-border patients.
Asunto(s)
Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Motivación , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/etnología , Adulto , Anciano , Comunicación , Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente/normas , Atención a la Salud/normas , Emigración e Inmigración/estadística & datos numéricos , Emociones , Etnicidad , Femenino , Humanos , Relaciones Interprofesionales , Masculino , Turismo Médico/psicología , Turismo Médico/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/psicología , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Percepción , Investigación Cualitativa , Turquía/etnologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of faecal immunochemical test (FIT)-based screening programs is highly dependent on consistent participation over multiple rounds. We evaluated adherence to FIT screening over four rounds and aimed to identify determinants of participation behaviour. METHODS: A total of 23 339 randomly selected asymptomatic persons aged 50-74 years were invited for biennial FIT-based colorectal cancer screening between 2006 and 2014. All were invited for every consecutive round, except for those who had moved out of the area, passed the upper age limit, or had tested positive in a previous screening round. A reminder letter was sent to non-responders. We calculated participation rates per round, response rates to a reminder letter, and differences in participation between subgroups defined by age, sex, and socioeconomic status (SES). RESULTS: Over the four rounds, participation rates increased significantly, from 60% (95% CI 60-61), 60% (95% CI 59-60), 62% (95% CI 61-63) to 63% (95% CI 62-64; P for trend<0.001) with significantly higher participation rates in women in all rounds (P<0.001). Of the 17 312 invitees eligible for at least two rounds of FIT screening, 12 455 (72%) participated at least once, whereas 4857 (28%) never participated; 8271 (48%) attended all rounds when eligible. Consistent participation was associated with older age, female sex, and higher SES. Offering a reminder letter after the initial invite in the first round increased uptake with 12%; in subsequent screening rounds this resulted in an additional uptake of up to 10%. CONCLUSIONS: In four rounds of a pilot biennial FIT-screening program, we observed a consistently high and increasing participation rate, whereas sending reminders remain effective. The substantial proportion of inconsistent participants suggests the existence of incidental barriers to participation, which, if possible, should be identified and removed.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/estadística & datos numéricos , Heces/química , Inmunohistoquímica , Tamizaje Masivo , Cooperación del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Neoplasias Colorrectales/epidemiología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/metabolismo , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Tamizaje Masivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Sangre Oculta , Participación del Paciente , Sistema de RegistrosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Self-reported data show differences in social outcomes (not being married/having a registered partnership; not living independently; using social benefits) for childhood cancer survivors compared with their peers. We aimed to determine differences in these social outcomes between survivors and the general population using national register data and explored associated risk factors. METHODS: We performed medical record linkage between a single-centre cohort of 1768 ≥ 5-year survivors of childhood cancer (diagnosed 1966-2001) and two national registers (1999-2011) and obtained a random reference sample matched on gender and year of birth per survivor. We used multivariable logistic regression to calculate in adult survivors of childhood cancer (born before 1990) the odds of the specified social outcomes at the end of follow-up in both groups. Within the survivors, we analysed risk factors for the social outcomes. RESULTS: We retrieved data from 1283 adult childhood cancer survivors and 25 082 reference persons. Survivors had higher odds (odds ratio; 95% confidence interval) of not being married (1.2; 1.07-1.42), not living independently (1.7; 1.41-2.00) and using social benefits (2.3; 1.98-2.69) compared with reference persons. Radiotherapy to head and/or neck, and an original central nervous system tumour diagnosis negatively influenced all social outcomes examined in childhood cancer survivors. CONCLUSIONS: National register data show differences between social outcomes in childhood cancer survivors and the general population, especially for survivors treated with radiotherapy to head and/or neck and those originally diagnosed with central nervous system tumours. Development and implementation of effective targeted support strategies to improve social outcomes of childhood cancer survivors needs consideration. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Asunto(s)
Supervivientes de Cáncer/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Sistema de Registros , Adulto , Supervivientes de Cáncer/psicología , Neoplasias del Sistema Nervioso Central , Niño , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Registro Médico Coordinado , Neoplasias/psicología , Neoplasias/terapia , Oportunidad Relativa , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: We assessed the burden of waiting for surveillance CT colonography (CTC) performed in patients having 6-9 mm colorectal polyps on primary screening CTC. Additionally, we compared the burden of primary and surveillance CTC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In an invitational population-based CTC screening trial, 101 persons were diagnosed with <3 polyps 6-9 mm, for which surveillance CTC after 3 years was advised. Validated questionnaires regarding expected and perceived burden (5-point Likert scales) were completed before and after index and surveillance CTC, also including items on burden of waiting for surveillance CTC. McNemar's test was used for comparison after dichotomization. RESULTS: Seventy-eight (77 %) of 101 invitees underwent surveillance CTC, of which 66 (85 %) completed the expected and 62 (79 %) the perceived burden questionnaire. The majority of participants (73 %) reported the experience of waiting for surveillance CTC as 'never' or 'only sometimes' burdensome. There was almost no difference in expected and perceived burden between surveillance and index CTC. Waiting for the results after the procedure was significantly more burdensome for surveillance CTC than for index CTC (23 vs. 8 %; p = 0.012). CONCLUSION: Waiting for surveillance CTC after primary CTC screening caused little or no burden for surveillance participants. In general, the burden of surveillance and index CTC were comparable. KEY POINTS: ⢠Waiting for surveillance CTC within a CRC screening caused little burden ⢠The vast majority never or only sometimes thought about their polyp(s) ⢠In general, the burden of index and surveillance CTC were comparable ⢠Awaiting results was more burdensome for surveillance than for index CTC.
Asunto(s)
Pólipos del Colon/diagnóstico por imagen , Pólipos del Colon/psicología , Colonografía Tomográfica Computarizada/métodos , Colonografía Tomográfica Computarizada/psicología , Costo de Enfermedad , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Anciano , Colon/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , TiempoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Ethnic inequalities in colorectal cancer care were reported previously in the United States. Studies specifically reporting on ethnic inequalities in rectal cancer care are limited. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore potential ethnic inequalities in rectal cancer care in the Netherlands. DESIGN: This was a nationwide, population-based observational study. SETTINGS: The study linked data of the Netherlands Cancer Registry with the Dutch population registry and the Social Statistics Database of Statistics Netherlands. Data were analyzed using stepwise multivariable logistic regression models. PATIENTS: All of the patients diagnosed with rectal carcinoma in 2003-2011 in the Netherlands (N = 27,159) were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We analyzed 2 rectal cancer treatment indicators (preoperative radiotherapy and sphincter-sparing surgery) and 2 indicators of short-term outcome of rectal cancer surgery (anastomotic leakage and 30-day postoperative mortality). RESULTS: Patients of Western non-Dutch and non-Western origin with rectal cancer were significantly younger and had a higher tumor stage than ethnic Dutch patients. Considering preoperative radiotherapy, anastomotic leakage, and 30-day postoperative mortality, no ethnic inequalities were detected. After adjustment for age, sex, disease characteristics, and socioeconomic status, Western non-Dutch and non-Western patients were significantly more likely to receive sphincter-sparing surgery than ethnic Dutch patients (OR = 1.27 (95% CI, 1.04-1.55) and OR = 1.57 (95% CI, 1.02-2.42)). LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by the relatively low numbers of non-Dutch patients with rectal cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Non-Dutch ethnic origin was associated with a higher rate of sphincter-sparing surgery. The absence of ethnic inequalities in preoperative radiotherapy, anastomotic leakage, and 30-day postoperative mortality suggests that ethnic minority patients have similar chances of optimal rectal cancer care outcomes as Dutch patients.
Asunto(s)
Disparidades en Atención de Salud/etnología , Neoplasias del Recto/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Países Bajos , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias del Recto/etnología , Neoplasias del Recto/mortalidad , Sistema de Registros , Medicina Estatal , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Research has shown that ethnic minority groups are less likely to participate in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening than the majority population and hence less likely to be diagnosed at an early stage when treatment is potentially more successful. OBJECTIVE: To explore knowledge, attitudes and beliefs regarding CRC and CRC screening among ethnic minority groups in the Netherlands. DESIGN: We conducted qualitative interviews with 30 first-generation immigrants born in Turkey, Morocco and Surinam. We based the topic guide on the health belief model. Framework analysis was used to analyse our data. RESULTS: Although knowledge of CRC and CRC screening was limited, all respondents felt susceptible to CRC. CRC screening was perceived to mainly benefit those individuals with poor health and symptoms. Although most respondents had a positive attitude towards CRC screening, knowledge about its potential harms was limited and self-efficacy to participate was low. Adult children acted as important mediators in providing access to information. The language barrier and low literacy formed serious barriers to informed participation in CRC screening. CONCLUSION: To ensure that all eligible individuals, including ethnic minority groups, have equal opportunities to informed participation in screening, targeted communication strategies should be developed, such as oral and visual channels, and face-to-face communication in the mother tongue. This will help ethnic minority groups to make an informed decision about participation in CRC screening.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/etnología , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Tamizaje Masivo , Anciano , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Emigrantes e Inmigrantes , Femenino , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Marruecos/etnología , Países Bajos , Investigación Cualitativa , Suriname/etnología , Turquía/etnologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: To explore the implications for public health policy of a new conceptualisation of health as 'The ability to adapt and to self-manage, in the face of social, physical and emotional challenges'. METHODS: Secondary qualitative data analysis of 28 focus group interviews, with 277 participants involved in public health and healthcare, on the future of the Dutch healthcare system. WHO's essential public health operations (EPHOs) were used as a framework for analysis. RESULTS: Starting from the new concept of health, participants perceived health as an individual asset, requiring an active approach in the Dutch population towards health promotion and adaptation to a healthy lifestyle. Sectors outside healthcare and public health were considered as resources to support individual lifestyle improvement. Integrating prevention and health promotion in healthcare is also expected to stimulate individuals to comply with a healthy lifestyle. Attention should be paid to persons less skilled to self-manage their own health, as this group may require a healthcare safety net. The relationship between individual and population health was not addressed, resulting in little focus on collective prevention to achieve health. CONCLUSIONS: The new concept of health as a basis for changes in the healthcare system offers opportunities to create a health-promoting societal context. However, inequalities in health within the general population may increase when using the new concept as an operationalisation of health. For public health, the main challenge is to maintain focus on the collective socioeconomic and environmental determinants of health and disease and, thereby, preserve collective prevention.
Asunto(s)
Adaptación Psicológica , Política de Salud , Estado de Salud , Salud Pública/métodos , Automanejo/métodos , Humanos , Investigación CualitativaRESUMEN
Supporting pregnant women to make informed choices about Down syndrome screening is widely endorsed. We reviewed the literature on: (a) the association between socioeconomic position and informed choices and decision-making about Down syndrome screening, and (b) the possible mediating variables (e.g., health literacy, numeracy skills, behavioral and communication variables) that might explain the relationship. EMBASE, MEDLINE, PubMed, CINAHL, and PsycINFO were searched from January 1999 to September 2014. The methodological quality of studies was determined by predefined criteria regarding the research aims, study design, study population and setting, measurement tools, and statistical analysis. A total of 33 studies met the inclusion criteria. Women from lower socioeconomic groups experience greater difficulties making informed choices about Down syndrome screening compared to women from higher socioeconomic groups. Most studies focus on individual dimensions of informed decision-making rather than assessing elements in conjunction with one another. Few studies have explored why there are socioeconomic differences in women's ability to make informed screening decisions. Future work is needed to identify mediating variables in this pathway. Systematic evidence-based intervention development to improve communication, understanding, and decision-making about Down syndrome screening is needed to ensure that women have an equal opportunity to make an informed choice about screening regardless of their socioeconomic position.
Asunto(s)
Conducta de Elección , Síndrome de Down/diagnóstico , Consentimiento Informado , Diagnóstico Prenatal/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Factores SocioeconómicosRESUMEN
This study aimed at analysing the association between socioeconomic status (SES) and psychosocial problems in preterm- and term-born children. Scores of mothers and teachers on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) regarding 217 preterm-born children (<37 weeks' gestation, mean 34 weeks) were compared with 4336 term-born children in the Amsterdam Born Children and their Development (ABCD) cohort at age 5-6 years. Associations between SDQ scores and SES (maternal education and perceived income adequacy) were examined with multivariate linear regression analysis. The mean mother-reported total difficulties score was significantly higher for preterm children (6.1 ± 4.7) than for term children (5.2 ± 4.1). After covariate adjustment, this difference was 0.5 (95 % CI 0.0-1.0). For preterm children 16.1 % of the mothers reported psychosocial problems compared with 10.1 % for term children. Lower maternal education and lower income adequacy were significantly related to higher SDQ scores of mothers and teachers. Differences in mothers' SDQ score between preterm and term children were larger in the high-education (Δ0.9, 95 % CI 0.2-1.5) and high-income group (Δ0.9, 95 % CI 0.3-1.6). No significant differences were found between preterm and term children in the SDQ scores reported by teachers. Low level of maternal education and inadequate income showed a much stronger association with psychosocial problems than preterm birth. No combined effect of low SES and preterm birth was found. This study corroborates the evidence for the strength of the disadvantageous effects of low SES on early psychosocial development.
Asunto(s)
Conducta Infantil/psicología , Desarrollo Infantil/fisiología , Recien Nacido Prematuro/psicología , Problema de Conducta/psicología , Clase Social , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Países Bajos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: After 11 years of follow-up, the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) reported a 29% reduction in prostate-cancer mortality among men who underwent screening for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels. However, the extent to which harms to quality of life resulting from overdiagnosis and treatment counterbalance this benefit is uncertain. METHODS: On the basis of ERSPC follow-up data, we used Microsimulation Screening Analysis (MISCAN) to predict the number of prostate cancers, treatments, deaths, and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained after the introduction of PSA screening. Various screening strategies, efficacies, and quality-of-life assumptions were modeled. RESULTS: Per 1000 men of all ages who were followed for their entire life span, we predicted that annual screening of men between the ages of 55 and 69 years would result in nine fewer deaths from prostate cancer (28% reduction), 14 fewer men receiving palliative therapy (35% reduction), and a total of 73 life-years gained (average, 8.4 years per prostate-cancer death avoided). The number of QALYs that were gained was 56 (range, -21 to 97), a reduction of 23% from unadjusted life-years gained. To prevent one prostate-cancer death, 98 men would need to be screened and 5 cancers would need to be detected. Screening of all men between the ages of 55 and 74 would result in more life-years gained (82) but the same number of QALYs (56). CONCLUSIONS: The benefit of PSA screening was diminished by loss of QALYs owing to postdiagnosis long-term effects. Longer follow-up data from both the ERSPC and quality-of-life analyses are essential before universal recommendations regarding screening can be made. (Funded by the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development and others.).
Asunto(s)
Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Calidad de Vida , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Anciano , Errores Diagnósticos/efectos adversos , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/efectos adversos , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/psicología , Europa (Continente) , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias de la Próstata/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/mortalidad , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Patients with potentially indolent prostate cancer (PC) can be managed with active surveillance (AS). Our objective was to analyse how anxiety and distress develop in men with untreated PC and whether highly anxious men quit AS. METHODS: One hundred and fifty Dutch patients who opted for AS in the Prostate cancer Research International: Active Surveillance Study were invited to participate in an additional prospective, longitudinal quality of life (QoL) study within 6 months after diagnosis. Participants completed questionnaires with validated measures on anxiety and distress at inclusion (t = 0), 9 (t = 9) and 18 (t = 18) months after diagnosis. We assessed changes in scores on depression (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) scale), generic anxiety (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-6)), PC-specific anxiety (Memorial Anxiety Scale for Prostate Cancer (MAX-PC)) and decisional conflict (Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS)) about patients' treatment choice between t = 0, t = 9 and t = 18 using repeated measures analysis. RESULTS: Response rates for patients still on AS at t = 0, t = 9 and t = 18 assessments were 86%, 90% and 96%, respectively. Nine patients (7%, 9/129) between t = 0 and t = 9 and 33 of 108 patients (31%) between t = 9 and t = 18 stopped AS, mostly (86%) because of protocol-based reasons. CES-D, total MAX-PC and DCS scores did not change significantly (p > 0.05) when comparing t = 18 with t = 9 and t = 0 scores, but generic anxiety (STAI-6; p = 0.033) and fear of disease progression (sub-score of the MAX-PC; p = 0.007) decreased significantly. These differences, however, were clinically modest (0.089 SD and 0.281 SD). Overall, six of 129 men (5%) discontinued AS because of anxiety and distress. CONCLUSIONS: When men with low-risk PC are managed with AS, fear of disease progression and general anxiety decreased, and only few may discontinue AS because of anxiety and distress. This suggests that negative QoL effects are limited in men with favourable clinical characteristics who opted for AS. (Registered trial number, NTR1718) .
Asunto(s)
Ansiedad/etiología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/psicología , Calidad de Vida , Estrés Psicológico/epidemiología , Espera Vigilante , Ansiedad/epidemiología , Toma de Decisiones , Depresión/epidemiología , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Miedo , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Vigilancia de la Población , Estudios Prospectivos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/complicaciones , Medición de Riesgo , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Informed decision making is recognized as important in screening. Invitees should be provided with relevant information, enabling them to make an informed decision. This may be more difficult in ethnic minority and low socio-economic status groups. We aimed to assess the proportion of informed decisions to participate in a faecal immunochemical test (FIT)-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening pilot and to explore differences in knowledge and attitude across various subgroups. METHODS: Asymptomatic persons aged 50-74 were invited to a second round of a Dutch FIT-based pilot screening programme for CRC. An information leaflet containing all information relevant to enable informed decision making accompanied the invitation. Informed choice was assessed by a mailed questionnaire. Knowledge was elicited through 18 items and attitude towards screening through four items. Main outcome measure was the proportion of informed decision makers among participants. Differences between subgroups were evaluated using logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 5367 screening participants, 2774 (52%) completed the questionnaire. Knowledge was adequate in 2554 (92%); 2736 (99%) showed a positive attitude towards screening. A total of 2525 persons had made an informed choice (91%); male gender, low education level, non-Dutch ethnicity and not speaking Dutch at home were negatively associated with having adequate knowledge in multivariable analysis. CONCLUSION: In FIT-based screening for CRC, the majority of responders made an informed decision to participate. However, we did not succeed in equally providing all population subgroups with sufficient information. Future initiatives should be aimed at reaching these groups to further enable informed decision making.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Sangre Oculta , Anciano , Conducta de Elección , Neoplasias Colorrectales/psicología , Toma de Decisiones , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Worldwide, refugees show a poorer mental and physical health than the populations among which they resettle. Little is known about the factors influencing health after resettlement. We examined the development of mental and physical health of refugees. As experienced living difficulties might decrease with obtaining a residence permit, we expected this to play a central role in health improvement after resettlement. METHODS: A two-wave study conducted in the Netherlands among a cohort of 172 recent (n = 68) and longstanding (n = 104) permit holders from Afghanistan, Iran and Somalia between 2003 and 2011. Multivariate mediation analyses were conducted for the effect of changes in living difficulties on the association between change in status and changes in health. Health outcomes were self-reported general health, number of chronic conditions, PTSD and anxiety/depression. RESULTS: Recent permit holders had larger decreases in PTSD score (-0.402, CI -0.612; -0.192) and anxiety/depression score (-0.298, CI -0.464; -0.132), and larger improvements in self-rated general health between T1 and T2 (0.566, CI 0.183; 0.949) than longstanding permit holders. This association was not significant for changes in number of chronic conditions. Mediation analyses showed that the effect of getting a residence permit on health improvements transited through an improvement in living conditions, in particular employment and the presence of family/social support. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that change in residence permit is beneficial for health mainly because of the change in living difficulties. These results add up to the evidence on the role of social circumstances for refugees upon resettlement, and point at labour participation and social support as key mechanisms for health improvements.
Asunto(s)
Estado de Salud , Salud Mental/etnología , Refugiados/legislación & jurisprudencia , Refugiados/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Afganistán/etnología , Ansiedad/etnología , Enfermedad Crónica/etnología , Depresión/etnología , Femenino , Humanos , Irán/etnología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Refugiados/psicología , Autoinforme , Factores Socioeconómicos , Somalia/etnología , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/etnologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Studies from the USA, New Zealand and Denmark suggest that many ethnic minority citizens obtain healthcare in their country of origin. Their reasons for doing so and the possible consequences remain unclear. METHODS: We used data from the Healthy Life in an Urban Setting study to investigate the magnitude, types, self-reported reasons and determinants of past-year healthcare consumption in the country of origin by ethnic minority people living in the Netherlands. Individuals of African Surinamese (n = 2059), South-Asian Surinamese (n = 1915), Ghanaian (n = 1426), Moroccan (n = 1516) and Turkish (n = 2245) origin were included (recruited 2011-2013). We performed descriptive and stepwise logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Respondents of Turkish origin reported the highest healthcare utilization in the country of origin (21.3%) compared with Moroccan (9.8%), Ghanaian (6.6%), African Surinamese (4.8%) and South-Asian Surinamese (3.0%) respondents. The main services used were outpatient clinics, pharmacies and health centres. The chief reported motivations were healthcare for illness, dissatisfaction with care in the residence country and seeking second opinions. Physical health status, cultural distance to the Dutch healthcare system and Turkish origin were all independently associated with healthcare use in countries of origin. CONCLUSION: Both health status and attitudes towards services in the countries of residence and origin are significantly associated with cross-border healthcare use. Further research is needed to clarify the reasons for the relatively high rates shown by Turkish respondents and to explore the consequences for health and for healthcare utilization in the country of residence.
Asunto(s)
Atención a la Salud/etnología , Atención a la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Etnicidad/etnología , Etnicidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Grupos Minoritarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , África/etnología , Anciano , Asia/etnología , Femenino , Ghana/etnología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Marruecos/etnología , Países Bajos , Turquía/etnología , Población Urbana/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Health care organizations need to be responsive to the needs of increasingly diverse patient populations. We compared the contents of six publicly available approaches to organizational responsiveness to diversity. The central questions addressed in this paper are: what are the most consistently recommended issues for health care organizations to address in order to be responsive to the needs of diverse groups that differ from the majority population? How much consensus is there between various approaches? METHODS: We purposively sampled six approaches from the US, Australia and Europe and used qualitative textual analysis to categorize the content of each approach into domains (conceptually distinct topic areas) and, within each domain, into dimensions (operationalizations). The resulting classification framework was used for comparative analysis of the content of the six approaches. RESULTS: We identified seven domains that were represented in most or all approaches: organizational commitment, empirical evidence on inequalities and needs, a competent and diverse workforce, ensuring access for all users, ensuring responsiveness in care provision, fostering patient and community participation, and actively promoting responsiveness. Variations in the operationalization of these domains related to different scopes, contexts and types of diversity. For example, approaches that focus on ethnic diversity mostly provide recommendations to handle cultural and language differences; approaches that take an intersectional approach and broaden their target population to vulnerable groups in a more general sense also pay attention to factors such as socio-economic status and gender. CONCLUSIONS: Despite differences in labeling, there is a broad consensus about what health care organizations need to do in order to be responsive to patient diversity. This opens the way to full scale implementation of organizational responsiveness in healthcare and structured evaluation of its effectiveness in improving patient outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Diversidad Cultural , Atención a la Salud/organización & administración , Australia , Competencia Clínica/normas , Participación de la Comunidad , Atención a la Salud/normas , Etnicidad , Europa (Continente) , Personal de Salud/normas , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Humanos , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Cultura Organizacional , Política Organizacional , Organizaciones/normas , Participación del Paciente , Derechos del Paciente , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Language barriers may lead to poorer healthcare services for patients who do not speak the same language as their care provider. Despite the benefits of professional interpreters, care providers tend to underuse professional interpretation. Evidence suggests that students who received training on language barriers and interpreter use are more likely to utilize interpretation services. AIMS: We developed an e-learning module for medical students on using professional interpreters during the medical interview, and evaluated its effects on students' knowledge and self-efficacy. METHODS: In the e-learning module, three patient-physician-interpreter video vignettes were presented, with three different types of interpreters: a family member, an untrained bilingual staff member, and a professional interpreter. The students answered two questions about each vignette, followed by feedback which compared their responses with expert information. In total, 281 fourth-year medical students took the e-learning module during the academic year 2012-2013. We assessed their knowledge and self-efficacy in interpreter use pre- and post-test on 1 (lowest)-10 (highest) scale, and analysed the differences in mean scores using paired t-tests. RESULTS: Upon completing the e-learning module, students reported higher self-efficacy in using professional interpretation. The mean knowledge score on the pre-test was 5.5 (95% confidence interval 5.3-5.8), but on the post-test this increased to 8.4 (95% CI 8.2-8.6). The difference was highly significant (p < 0.001). For self-efficacy, the mean score on the pre-test was 4.9 (95% CI 4.7-5.1), and on the post-test 7.0 (95% CI 6.8-7.1); p < 0.001. CONCLUSION: This e-learning module improved students' knowledge and self-efficacy in using professional interpreters during the medical interview. Using such tools in medical curricula might encourage future doctors to use professional interpretation services to overcome language barriers, thereby potentially contributing to equitable healthcare services for a linguistically diverse patient population.
Asunto(s)
Barreras de Comunicación , Educación a Distancia/métodos , Multilingüismo , Estudiantes de Medicina , Traducción , Competencia Cultural , Femenino , Humanos , Internet , Conocimiento , Masculino , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , AutoeficaciaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Referral for colposcopy because of abnormal Pap test results is likely to be distressing, but the extent and duration of these effects are unknown. We aimed to fill this gap. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study at two departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology (an academic and a non-academic setting). Women referred for colposcopy completed questionnaires before colposcopy, and at 1, 3, and 6 months afterwards. A reference group of 706 screen participants, aged 29-60 years old, was included and completed questionnaires once. Main outcome measures were generic health-related quality of life (HRQoL), assessed through the EQ-5D and the SF-12 physical and mental scores (PCS-12 and MCS-12); anxiety as assessed by STAI-6, and screen-specific anxiety as assessed by the psychological consequences questionnaire (PCQ). RESULTS: 154 women responded to the questionnaire, of whom 132 were included in the analyses. Histological results were CIN 1 in 17/115 women (15%) and CIN 2+ in 62 (54%). In 36 women (31%) there was no histologically confirmed neoplasia. Before colposcopy physical HRQoL scores were similar or slightly better than in the reference group, while mental HRQoL (MSC-12) and (screen-specific) anxiety were worse (p<0.001). Irrespective of CIN-grades, anxiety washed out during follow-up (p<0.001), with changes being clinically relevant. CONCLUSIONS: Referral for gynecological evaluation because of abnormal PAP-test results was distressing. Anxiety--and not the physical burden of management--seemed to be the most bothersome to women. For all CIN-grades, distress disappeared over six months following colposcopy, suggesting a reassuring effect of gynecological management.
Asunto(s)
Ansiedad/etiología , Colposcopía/psicología , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/psicología , Calidad de Vida , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/diagnóstico , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Derivación y ConsultaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a major health problem among refugees worldwide. After resettlement, the prevalence of PTSD remains high despite the fact that various PTSD treatments are known to be effective. METHODS: We examined the course of PTSD and the role of mental health care utilisation at a 7-year interval (2003-2010) among a cohort of refugees from Iran, Afghanistan, and Somalia after resettlement in the Netherlands. RESULTS: The unchanged high prevalence of PTSD (16.3% in 2003 and 15.2% in 2010) was attributable in part to late onset of PTSD symptoms (half of the respondents with PTSD at T2 were new cases for whom PTSD developed after 2003). The second reason concerned the low use of mental health care services at T1. Whereas the multivariate analyses showed the effectiveness of mental health care, only 21% of respondents with PTSD at T1 had had contact with a mental health care provider at that time. Use of mental health care during the first wave increased the odds of improvement in PTSD symptoms between both measurements (OR 7.58, 95% CI 1.01; 56.85). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study suggest there are two possible explanations for the persistently high prevalence of PTSD among refugees. One is the late onset of PTSD and the other is the low utilisation of mental health care. Health care professionals should be aware of these issues, especially given the effectiveness of mental health care for this condition.