Enhancement of bone mass in osteoporotic women with parathyroid hormone followed by alendronate.

Treatment of osteoporosis with PTH causes a marked increase in vertebral bone mineral density (BMD). However, this effect is rapidly reversed when the treatment is stopped. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether the bisphosphonate alendronate could preserve or enhance bone density in patients previously treated with PTH. Sixty-six postmenopausal osteoporotic women were treated for 1 yr with 50, 75, or 100 microg recombinant human PTH-(1-84) or placebo, and then were given 10 mg alendronate daily for an additional year. BMD was measured in the femoral neck, lumbar spine, and whole body. Markers of bone turnover included skeletal alkaline phosphatase, osteocalcin, and N-telopeptide. During the first year, changes in BMD (mean +/- SD) in women receiving PTH (all doses combined) were 7.1 +/- 5.6% (spine), 0.3 +/- 6.2% (femoral neck), and -2.3 +/- 3.3% (total body). After switching to alendronate for 1 yr in women who previously had received PTH, mean changes in BMD were 13.4 +/- 6.4% (spine), 4.4 +/- 7.2% (femoral neck), and 2.6 +/- 3.1% (whole body). In the subgroup of patients who had received the highest dose of PTH, the mean increase in vertebral BMD was 14.6 +/- 7.9%. All markers of bone turnover increased during treatment with PTH and decreased to below baseline after 1 yr of alendronate. In conclusion, sequential treatment of osteoporosis with PTH and alendronate results in an increase in vertebral bone density that is considerably more than has been reported with alendronate or estrogens alone. This combination of drugs may be a useful approach to maximizing bone density in women with vertebral osteoporosis.

Effect of combined risedronate and hormone replacement therapies on bone mineral density in postmenopausal women.

Both hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and bisphosphonates are efficacious in the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Combined therapy with bisphosphonate and HRT is likely to be used in clinical practice, and limited data are available regarding its efficacy and safety. This was a 1-yr, double blind, placebo-controlled study in which 524 postmenopausal women received daily treatment with conjugated equine estrogens (0.625 mg) alone or in combination with risedronate (5 mg). Women who had not undergone hysterectomy received medroxyprogesterone acetate (up to 5 mg, daily or cyclically) at the discretion of the investigator. The primary efficacy end point was the percent change from baseline in mean lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) at 1 yr. Changes in BMD at the proximal femur and forearm, bone turnover markers, and histology and histomorphometry were also assessed. At 12 months, significant (P < 0.05) increases from baseline in lumbar spine BMD were observed in both treatment groups (HRT-only, 4.6%; combined risedronate-HRT, 5.2%); the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant. Both therapies led to significant increases in BMD at 12 months at the femoral neck (1.8% and 2.7%, respectively), femoral trochanter (3.2% and 3.7%), distal radius (1.7% and 1.6%), and midshaft radius (0.4% and 0.7%). The differences between groups were statistically significant (P < 0.05) at the femoral neck and midshaft radius. Both combined risedronate-HRT and HRT-only produced significant decreases in the biochemical markers of bone turnover, with somewhat greater decreases in the combined treatment group. Bone biopsy data showed normal bone structure and normal mineralization with either treatment. Expected decreases in bone turnover were observed and were greater in the combined treatment group (68-79% reduction relative to baseline values, P < 0.005). Overall, combined treatment had a safety profile similar to that of HRT-only, including bone and gastrointestinal safety profiles. In conclusion, the combined treatment with risedronate and HRT had a favorable effect on BMD similar to that of HRT alone at the lumbar spine and slightly, but significantly, greater than that of HRT alone at the femoral neck and midshaft radius. The combined treatment was well tolerated, and there were no adverse effects on the skeleton.

Comparison of alendronate and intranasal calcitonin for treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.

This study compared the effects of oral alendronate and intranasal calcitonin for treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Women at least 5 yr postmenopause (n = 299) were randomized to either 10 mg alendronate, matching alendronate placebo, or open-label intranasal calcitonin 200 IU daily for 12 months. Hip and spine bone mineral density (BMD) and markers of bone turnover were measured, and safety and tolerability were assessed. Alendronate produced greater increases in BMD than calcitonin at 12 months at the lumbar spine (5.16% vs. 1.18%; P < 0.001), trochanter (4.73% vs. 0.47%; P < 0.001), and femoral neck (2.78% vs. 0.58%; P < 0.001). Changes in BMD with calcitonin were greater than with placebo at the femoral neck, but were not different from placebo at either the trochanter or lumbar spine. Greater decreases in bone turnover were seen with alendronate than with calcitonin (serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, 43% vs. 9%, P < 0.001; urinary N-telopeptide, 62% vs. 11%, P < 0.001). Similar percentages of patients in each group reported an adverse experience during the study. We conclude that, in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, 12 months of therapy with alendronate produced significantly greater increases in BMD of the hip and spine and greater decreases in bone turnover than intranasal calcitonin.

Rechallenge of patients who had discontinued alendronate therapy because of upper gastrointestinal symptoms.

BACKGROUND: There have been reports from physicians in clinical practice that up to 30% of patients taking bisphosphonate therapy develop upper gastrointestinal (UGI) symptoms, many or most of which they assume to be related to the drug. However, in several large placebo-controlled clinical trials of bisphosphonates, the incidence of UGI symptoms has been > or =30%, even among patients receiving placebo, perhaps reflecting a high background incidence of UGI events in osteoporotic patients. OBJECTIVE: To assess the relationship between alendronate treatment and UGI complaints in patients who had discontinued treatment with alendronate in clinical practice because of UGI symptoms, we compared the incidence of such events on rechallenge with alendronate or placebo. METHODS: This was a multicenter, double-blind trial in which postmenopausal women with osteoporosis who had previously discontinued alendronate therapy because of a UGI adverse experience were randomized to daily treatment with either alendronate 10 mg or matching placebo (1:1 ratio) for 8 weeks. The primary end point was the cumulative incidence of discontinuations due to any UGI adverse experience. Secondary end points were the incidence of any clinical adverse experiences and the percentage change from baseline in urinary N-telopeptide adjusted for urinary creatinine at week 8. RESULTS: A total of 172 women were included in the study. They were a mean of 20.9 years past menopause, ranging in age from 41 to 90 years (mean, 67.0 years); 90.7% were white. On rechallenge, 14.8% (13/88) of patients in the alendronate group and 16.7% (14/84) in the placebo group discontinued treatment because of UGI adverse experiences. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that many UGI adverse experiences reported during therapy with alendronate may reflect a high background incidence of UGI complaints and an increased sensitivity to detection of such complaints, rather than a causal relationship to therapy.

When and how to use dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis.

Osteoporosis is treatable and preventable. Early diagnosis, therapeutic intervention, and the use and availability of bone density testing to diagnose and monitor response to therapy have greatly improved the prognosis. The most important use of bone mass measurement is in risk assessment for future fractures to determine whether an intervention is to be used. For a change of one standard deviation of bone mineral density below the mean of young normal values, the risk of all fractures approximately doubles. Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry technology and indications for bone density testing are reviewed and how to interpret and individualize this data for each patient is suggested.