Diagnosing Fabry nephropathy: the challenge of multiple kidney disease.

Fabry disease (FD) is an X-linked inherited lysosomal disorder due to a deficiency of the enzyme alpha-galactosidase A (α-gla) due to mutations in the GLA gene. These mutations result in plasma and lysosome accumulation of glycosphingolipids, leading to progressive organ damage and reduced life expectancy. Due to the availability of specific disease-modifying treatments, proper and timely diagnosis and therapy are essential to prevent irreversible complications. However, diagnosis of FD is often delayed because of the wide clinical heterogeneity of the disease and multiple organ involvement developing in variable temporal sequences. This observation is also valid for renal involvement, which may manifest with non-specific signs, such as proteinuria and chronic kidney disease, which are also common in many other nephropathies. Moreover, an additional confounding factor is the possibility of the coexistence of FD with other kidney disorders. Thus, suspecting and diagnosing FD nephropathy in patients with signs of kidney disease may be challenging for the clinical nephrologist. Herein, also through the presentation of a unique case of co-occurrence of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease and FD, we review the available literature on cases of coexistence of FD and other renal diseases and discuss the implications of these conditions. Moreover, we highlight the clinical, laboratory, and histological elements that may suggest clinical suspicion and address a proper diagnosis of Fabry nephropathy.

Diagnostic yield and predictive value on left ventricular remodelling of genetic testing in dilated cardiomyopathy.

AIMS: We assessed the diagnostic yield of genetic testing and the relationship of left ventricular (LV) reverse remodelling (LVRR) with the presence of DNA pathogenic (P) or likely pathogenic (LP) variants in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). METHODS AND RESULTS: From 680 outpatients followed at the Heart Failure Outpatient Clinic of our institution, we selected subjects with a diagnosis of DCM as defined by LV ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤40% and LV dilatation not explained by coronary artery disease or other causes. All patients were offered genetic investigation of 42 disease-associated DCM genes with next-generation sequencing. Seventy patients fulfilled the definition of DCM and 66 underwent genetic investigation. We identified 18 P/LP variants in 16 patients, with a diagnostic yield of 24%. The most common variants were truncating TTN variants (n = 7), followed by LMNA (n = 3), cytoskeleton Z-disc (n = 3), ion channel (n = 2), motor sarcomeric (n = 2), and desmosomal (n = 1) genes. After a median follow-up of 53 months (inter-quartile range 20-111), patients without P/LP variants exhibited higher systolic and diastolic blood pressure, lower plasma brain natriuretic peptide levels, and a larger extent of LVRR, as reflected by the increase in LVEF (+14% vs. +1%, P = 0.0008) and decrease in indexed LV end-diastolic diameter (-6.5 vs. -2 mm/m2 , P = 0.03) compared with patients with P/LP variants. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm the high diagnostic yield of genetic testing in selected DCM patients and suggest that identification of P/LP variants in DCM portends poorer LVRR in response to guideline-directed medical therapy.