Transferring patients with Ebola by land and air: the British military experience.

The Ebola epidemic of 2014/2015 led to a multinational response to control the disease outbreak. Assurance for British aid workers included provision of a robust treatment pathway including repatriation back to the UK. This pathway involved the use of both land and air assets to ensure that patients were transferred quickly, and safely, to a high-level isolation unit in the UK. Following a road move in Sierra Leone, an air transportable isolator (ATI) was used to transport patients for the flight and onward transfer to the Royal Free Hospital. There are several unique factors related to managing a patient with Ebola virus disease during prolonged evacuation, including the provision of care inside an ATI. These points are considered here along with an outline of the evacuation pathway.

A descriptive survey of operating theatre and intensive care unit temperature management of burn patients in the United Kingdom.

BACKGROUND: Patients with major burns lose the normal thermoregulatory function of their skin. They exhibit profound changes in metabolism which aim to compensate for the heat loss associated with water loss through burnt skin. Although these changes in physiology are well documented, the optimal methods for temperature management in both the Operating Theatre and Intensive Care Unit are less clear. METHODS: We distributed a survey consisting of 19 questions to all burn units and centres in the United Kingdom with the aim of ascertaining perception of both hypo and hyperthermia, as well as methods used to manage both of these scenarios. RESULTS: In the Operating Theatre, most respondents stated that they measured core temperature (82%); either alone (33%) or in conjunction with peripheral temperature (49%). In the Intensive Care Unit, most respondents measured both core and peripheral temperature (67%), with only a small minority not measuring core temperature (13%). Taking into consideration all professional groups, patients were considered hypothermic if their body temperature was less than 36.2°C (+/-0.7°C). On average, a patient was considered hyperthermic if their body temperature was above 38.8°C (+/-0.6°C). CONCLUSION: Differences in perception between the professional groups surveyed did not reach clinical or statistical significance. In both the Operating Theatre and Intensive Care Unit, hypothermia was most often managed by increasing the ambient room temperature whereas hyperthermia was most often managed by giving paracetamol. As far as we are aware, this is the first study of the management of altered thermoregulation in major burn patients in the United Kingdom.

A comment on prognostic factors in burns.

We read the recent paper "Prognostic factors in patients with burns" [1] by Zielinski et al. with great interest. The article is very informative, in a concise and eloquent manner, allowing the reader to familiarise themselves with the plethora of prognostication models used worldwide in the assessment of burn patients. However, reading the paper we noticed that two aspects may require further consideration to provide the reader with a more comprehensive understanding of prognostication in burn patients.