Familial Aggregation and Heritability of Loa loa Microfilaremia.

Background: For a given prevalence of Loa loa microfilaremia, the proportion of people with high densities varies significantly between communities. We hypothesized that this variation is related to the existence of familial clusters of hypermicrofilaremic individuals that would be the consequence of a genetic predisposition to present high L. loa microfilarial densities. Methods: A familial study was performed in 10 villages in the Okola Health District of Cameroon. Intrafamilial correlation coefficients and heritability estimates were assessed for both the presence of L. loa microfilaremia and individual microfilarial densities by controlling for age, sex, Mansonella perstans coinfection, and household effects. Results: Pedigrees were constructed for 1126 individuals. A significant familial susceptibility to be microfilaremic for L. loa was found for first-degree relatives (ρ = 0.08, P < .05; heritability = 0.23). Regarding individual microfilarial densities, a significant familial aggregation was demonstrated (ρ = 0.36 for first-degree and 0.27 for second-degree relatives). For first-degree relatives, the highest coefficient was found between mothers and daughters (ρ = 0.57). The overall heritability estimate for L. loa microfilarial density was 0.24 (P = .003). Conclusions: A significant genetic component governs L. loa microfilarial density. This supports the hypothesis that a genetic predisposition to be hypermicrofilaremic exists, leading to the presence of familial clusters of individuals at risk for postivermectin severe adverse events. This finding should be taken into account while developing sampling strategies (including a household-level sampling) to identify villages where community-directed treatment with ivermectin cannot be applied.

Seasonal influenza vaccination coverage and its determinants among nursing homes personnel in western France.

BACKGROUND: Influenza-associated deaths is an important risk for the elderly in nursing homes (NHs) worldwide. Vaccination coverage among residents is high but poorly effective due to immunosenescence. Hence, vaccination of personnel is an efficient way to protect residents. Our objective was to quantify the seasonal influenza vaccination (IV) coverage among NH for elderly workers and identify its determinants in France. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study in March 2016 in a randomized sample of NHs of the Ille-et-Vilaine department of Brittany, in western France. A standardized questionnaire was administered to a randomized sample of NH workers for face-to-face interviews. General data about the establishment was also collected. RESULTS: Among the 33 NHs surveyed, IV coverage for the 2015-2016 season among permanent workers was estimated at 20% (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 15.3%-26.4%) ranging from 0% to 69% depending on the establishments surveyed. Moreover, IV was associated with having previously experienced a "severe" influenza episode in the past (Prevalence Ratio 1.48, 95% CI 1.01-2.17), and varied by professional categories (p < 0.004) with better coverage among administrative staff. Better knowledge about influenza prevention tools was also correlated (p < 0.001) with a higher IV coverage. Individual perceptions of vaccination benefits had a significant influence on the IV coverage (p < 0.001). Although IV coverage did not reach a high rate, our study showed that personnel considered themselves sufficiently informed about IV. CONCLUSIONS: IV coverage remains low in the NH worker population in Ille-et-Vilaine and also possibly in France. Strong variations of IV coverage among NHs suggest that management and working environment play an important role. To overcome vaccine "hesitancy", specific communication tools may be required to be adapted to the various NH professionals to improve influenza prevention.

Risk factors for colonization and infection with multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in intensive care unit: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Infection with resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (RPA) in the intensive care unit (ICU) is known to be either endogenous or exogenous or both, but the roles of each of these contamination routes are yet to be clarified. Data regarding prevalence, risk factors, and environmental factors associated with RPA in ICU are very scanty and even when they exist, they seem to be contradictory. So, there is a strong interest in understanding both individual and environmental factors associated with RPA infection. This systematic review aims to investigate individual and environmental factors associated with the colonization and infection with RPA in ICU. METHODOLOGY: MEDLINE (Pubmed), EMBASE (OVID), the Cochrane Library (Wiley), Web of Science, CINAHL (EBSCOHost), and LILACS (BIREME) will be searched from inception onwards. Grey literature will be identified through Google Scholar and Open Grey. Two reviewers will independently screen all citations, abstracts, and full-text articles. Potential conflicts will be resolved through discussion. Methodological quality including bias will be appraised using appropriate approaches. A narrative synthesis will describe the quality and content of the epidemiological evidence. Prevalence, odds ratio, relative risk, and hazard radio with their respective 95% confidence intervals will be calculated. A meta-analysis of data extracted from eligible studies with similar populations and RPA testing will be performed. The analysis will evaluate factors influencing the estimates. A random effect model will be used to summarize effect sizes. DISCUSSION: Two contrasting hypotheses on risk factors of acquisition, colonization, and infection of RPA are being debated, especially in a context where available data are scanty or exhibit high discrepancy. Indeed, most of the reviews have been focalized on hospitalized patients, and not in ICU, and few of them address the issue of environmental factors. To fill that gap, this review will combine both analyses of individual and environmental risk factors using prevalence studies in ICU and evaluation of different methodologies. These two hypotheses will be tested and challenged and could serve as a basis for a more in-depth study to fill the methodological gaps that will be identified as part of this current review. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: This protocol has been submitted to the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) and the registration number attributed was CRD42021233832 of 07 March 2021.

Challenges, best practices, and lessons learned from oral cholera mass vaccination campaign in urban Cameroon during the COVID-19 era.

BACKGROUND: Since 1971, Cameroon has been facing an ever-growing series of cholera epidemics; despite all the efforts made by the government to address this substantial public health problem. In 2020, in addition to the COVID-19 pandemic, Cameroon recorded a high cholera case fatality rate of 5.3% following epidemics noted in the South, Littoral, and South-West regions which is far higher than the 1% World Health Organization acceptable rate. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The Ministry of Public Health organized a reactive vaccination campaign against cholera to address the high mortality rate in the affected health districts. The first round was in August 2020 and the second in March 2021. We conducted a cross-sectional study and reviewed this vaccination campaign's challenges, best practices, and lessons. The vaccination coverage for the two doses of the oral cholera vaccine was 80.4%, with a refusal rate as high as 67%. People 20 years and above recorded the lowest vaccination coverage. The main challenge was misinformation about the cholera vaccine. The best practice was thorough population sensitization through community actors. CONCLUSION: Proper communication will always brave the odds of hesitancy and favor mass population vaccination to thwart hesitancy and consolidate herd immunity.