The Impact of the Comprehensive Unit-Based Safety Program on the Perioperative Efficiency and Patient Safety of Adult Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Procedures: Retrospective Comparative Study.

BACKGROUND: The complexity of health care delivery systems presents a unique challenge for the perioperative space. In the area of arthroplasty procedures, the shift of complex patients into ambulatory surgery centers and reimbursement that is no longer commensurate with the inflated costs of performing these procedures have created difficulties for hospitals and physicians alike. Thus, there is a critical need to optimize perioperative workflows while maintaining high-quality care provision. METHODS: Our institution implemented the Comprehensive Unit-based Safety Program (CUSP) to improve the quality and efficiency of total knee and hip arthroplasties (TKAs and THAs). This initiative involved extensive collaboration with clinical and administrative teams, as well as 5 intervention-driven workgroups. First-case on-time start rates and duration of first-case delays, case length, anesthesia preparation, in-room patient preparation, operation, patient exit, and room turnover after CUSP implementation were analyzed using independent samples median testing, Mann-Whitney U testing, and a percentage-point difference calculation. RESULTS: After CUSP arthroplasty implementation, first-case on-time start rates increased from 43 to 81%. Statistically significant decreases were observed in median times for first-case delays, case length, in-room patient preparation, operation, patient exit, and room turnover for TKAs and THAs, but not anesthesia preparation. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of CUSP arthroplasty for TKAs and THAs resulted in significant improvements in nearly all efficiency metrics, as well as preventions of patient safety missteps. These results exemplify the versatility of CUSP as a quality improvement method that can maintain patient safety and perioperative efficiency in the arthroplasty service of a large-scale medical center. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Evaluating compliance with the best practice guidelines for wrong-level surgery prevention in high-risk pediatric spine surgery.

PURPOSE: In 2018, Best Practice Guidelines (BPGs) were published for preventing wrong-level surgery in pediatric spinal deformity, but successful implementation has not been established. The purpose of this study was to evaluate BPG compliance 5 years after publication. We hypothesized higher compliance among BPG authors and among surgeons with more experience, higher caseload, and awareness of the BPGs. METHODS: We queried North American and European surgeons, authors and nonauthors, and members of pediatric spinal study groups on adherence to BPGs using an anonymous survey consisting of 18 Likert scale questions. Respondents provided years in practice, yearly caseload, and guideline awareness. Mean compliance scores (MCS) were developed by correlating Likert responses with MCS scores ("None of the time" = no compliance = MCS 0, "Sometimes" = weak to moderate = MCS 1, "Most of the time" = high = MCS 2, and "All the time" = perfect = MCS 3). RESULTS: Of the 134 respondents, 81.5% reported high or perfect compliance. Average MCS for all guidelines was 2.4 ± 0.4. North American and European surgeons showed no compliance differences (2.4 vs. 2.3, p = 0.07). Authors and nonauthors showed significantly different compliance scores (2.8 vs 2.4, p < 0.001), as did surgeons with and without knowledge of the BPGs (2.5 vs 2.2, p < 0.001). BPG awareness and compliance showed a moderate positive correlation (r = 0.48, p < 0.001), with non-significant associations between compliance and both years in practice (r = 0.41, p = 0.64) and yearly caseload (r = 0.02, p = 0.87). CONCLUSION: Surgeons reported high or perfect compliance 81.5% of the time with BPGs for preventing wrong-level surgery. Authorship and BPG awareness showed increased compliance. Location, study group membership, years in practice, and yearly caseload did not affect compliance. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V-expert opinion.