CCL3/macrophage inflammatory protein-1alpha induces fever and increases prostaglandin E2 in cerebrospinal fluid of rats: effect of antipyretic drugs.

The aim of this study was to investigate whether the increase in body temperature caused by intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) injection of recombinant mouse CCL3/MIP1alpha [C-C (two adjacent conserved cysteines) ligand 3/macrophage inflammatory protein-1alpha] constitutes solely a hyperthermic response or a true integrated fever. Additionally, we examined the effects of systemic administration of different antipyretic drugs including the glucocorticoid dexamethasone, on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentration of prostaglandin (PG) E2 and on febrile response induced by CCL3/MIP1alpha. I.c.v. administration of CCL3/MIP1alpha evokes an integrated fever accompanied by a reduction in tail skin temperature and an increase in PGE2 concentration in the CSF. Dexamethasone and indomethacin markedly reduced the fever and the elevation of CSF PGE2 concentration induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) whereas both response evoked by i.c.v. CCL3/MIP1alpha were insensitive to this steroid. Indomethacin only blocked the PGE2 increase in the CSF whereas ibuprofen and celecoxib each blocked the fever and the elevation of CSF PGE2. In this study, we have demonstrated for the first time that CCL3/MIP1alpha evokes an integrated febrile response accompanied by an increase of PGE2 levels in the CSF. These events are dissociated, especially in animals treated with indomethacin. If PGE2 does not participate in the febrile response evoked by CCL3/MIP1alpha, the inhibition of this response by celecoxib and ibuprofen indicates additional mechanisms to the well-known inhibition of COX enzymes by these drugs. Such mechanisms do not seem to depend on cytokine synthesis and subsequent COX-2 induction.

The future of stem cells in liver diseases.

Preliminary experience with clinical hepatocyte transplantation during the past decade has provided proof of concept that cell therapy can be effective for the treatment of some liver diseases. Recent progress in cell biology resulting in the isolation and characterization of hepatic stem cells and progenitor cells further increased the expectation for a new approach to the treatment of genetic and chronic liver disease. Several potential sources have been identified of hepatic stem/ progenitor cells exhibiting both differentiation towards the hepatic lineage in vitro and hepatic parenchymal repopulation with liver-specific metabolic activity in liver-injured animal models. However, a few of these results proved to be poorly reproducible in different laboratories, and it was recognized that some initial optimistic conclusions were drawn from incorrect interpretation of experimental data or from insufficient knowledge of the mechanisms involved in tissue regeneration. Moreover, only modest results have emerged so far from ongoing clinical experience involving the use of putative stem cells in liver disease. There is much need for a joined effort to concentrate the resources on a specific cell population, in order to better characterize its function, to assess its safety and to develop better focused clinical trials. In conclusion, while the biological features of stem cells still justify the hope for future clinical applications, hepatic stem cell therapy has still a long way to go from bench to bedside.