Anal canal duplication in children: a monocentric experience of 12 cases.

PURPOSE: Anal canal duplication is a rare malformation characterized by a second perineal opening positioned behind the anus, which is generally observed at 6 o'clock in the lithotomy position. The purpose was to describe six new cases of anal canal duplication (in addition to our previously reported series of six patients) with the aim of providing further clinical information about this anomaly. METHODS: We described 6 new cases of anal canal duplication in terms of symptoms, anatomical disposition, imaging results, and histopathology. Clinical details of these cases and those already reported (n = 12) were summarized and compared to existing literature. RESULTS: A total of 12 cases were reported over 34 years. 17% of the patients were male, constituting the only subgroup to present a communication with the digestive tract. A single patient, diagnosed at 12 years, was symptomatic. Half of the patients had at least one associated malformation. All patients underwent surgery, either with a posterior sagittal or perineal approach. CONCLUSION: Diagnosis of anal canal duplication should be suspected when a perineal opening positioned behind the anus is present, and necessitates further exploration by a comprehensive clinical examination and imaging. Surgery is always required, typically performed via a posterior sagittal approach. The postoperative course is usually uncomplicated.

Study of abdominal wall muscle innervation applied to large-defect closure in congenital diaphragmatic hernia.

In large congenital diaphragmatic hernias (CDHs), direct suture of the diaphragm is impossible. Surgeons can use a triangular internal oblique muscle (IOM) plus transverse abdominis muscle (TAM) flap. Its caudal limit faces the medial extremity of the 11th rib. Clinical studies show that the flap is not hypotonic but that the procedure could expose patients already presenting a hypoplastic lung to external oblique muscle (EOM) hypotonia. The aims of this study were to study EOM innervation by the 10th intercostal nerve (ICN) and ICN innervation to the IOM and TAM. Forty cadaveric abdominal hemi-walls were dissected. The number of branches and the trajectory of each specimen's 10th ICN were studied medially to the medial extremity of the 11th rib (MEK11) using surgical goggles and a microscope (Carl Zeiss®). The 10th ICN was consistently found between the IOM and TAM. There was a median of nine branches from the 10th ICN to the EOM, 77% of them medial to the MEK11. Median values of nine and 12 branches for the IOM and TAM were found, 60% and 51%, respectively, medial to the MEK11. These results argue in favor of good innervation to the IOM plus TAM flap but also indicate postoperative abdominal weakness exposing patients to herniation risks, as more than 75% of the branches from the 10th ICN to the EOM were sectioned or pulled away during flap detachment. Clin. Anat., 33:759-766, 2020. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

A New Paradigm for the Management of Thoracolumbar Pediatric Spine Traumas.

OBJECTIVES: The transient breath holding sign (TBHS) is a clinical sign often associated with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) spine traumatic lesions. The aims of this study were to prospectively evaluate the TBHS in the detection of thoracolumbar lesions in a large cohort of children and to establish a comprehensive strategy on the use of MRI in spine traumas in children. STUDY DESIGN: All conscious 5- to 16-year-old patients admitted for a spine trauma in our institution were prospectively included in the study. All patients were asked for the TBHS and underwent a full spine MRI. Sensitivity and specificity of the TBHS were derived from the confusion matrix. All MRI lesions were analyzed and classified. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-eight patients were included. The sensitivity of the TBHS was 92%, the specificity was 83%, the positive predictive value was 83%, and the negative predictive value was 91%. The x-rays missed 67% of the vertebrae injured in the MRI. The MRI lesions consisted in an upper end plate injury, in the sagittal plane only, in 90% of the cases. The vertebral canal and the spinal cord were never injured. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that the TBHS is a relevant clinical tool that should be added in the routine questionnaire after any trauma at admission. Magnetic resonance imaging should be restricted to patients with a TBHS positive at admission. A single T2 Short T1 Inversion Recovery (STIR) sagittal sequence seems sufficient to make the diagnosis and could replace the use of standard x-rays in pediatric spine traumas.