Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Ann Surg ; 275(6): e759-e765, 2022 06 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32740246

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery establishes a considerable pathologic complete response (pCR) in EC. The aim was to determine site of residual tumor and its prognostic impact. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: High rates of residual tumor in the adventitial region even inside the radiation fields will influence current decision-making. METHODS: We evaluated resection specimens with marked target fields from 151 consecutive EC patients treated with carboplatin/paclitaxel and 41.4Gy between 2009 and 2018. RESULTS: In radically resected (R0) specimens 19.8% (27/136) had a pCR (ypT0N0) and 14% nearly no response (tumor regression grade: tumor regression grade 4-5). Residual tumor commonly extended in or restricted to the adventitia (43.1%; 47/109), whereas 7.3% was in the mucosa (ypT1a), 16.5% in the submucosa (ypT1b) and 6.4% only in lymph nodes (ypT0N+). Macroscopic residues in R0-specimens of partial responders (tumor regression grade 2-3: N = 90) were found in- and outside the gross tumor volume (GTV) in 33.3% and 8.9%, and only microscopic in- and outside the clinical target volume in 58.9% and 1.1%, respectively. Residual nodal disease was observed proximally and distally to the clinical target volume in 2 and 5 patients, respectively. Disease Free Survival decreased significantly if macroscopic tumor was outside the GTV and in ypT2-4aN+. CONCLUSIONS: After neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, pCR and ypT1aN0 were seen in a limited number of R0 resected specimens (19.8% and 7.3%, respectively), whereas 6.4% had only nodal disease (yT0N+). Disease Free Survival decreased significantly if macroscopic residue was outside the GTV and in responders with only nodal disease. Therefore, we should be cautious in applying wait and see strategies.


Asunto(s)
Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Quimioradioterapia , Humanos , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasia Residual/patología
2.
Acta Oncol ; 60(3): 277-284, 2021 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33151766

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: When treating patients for esophageal cancer (EC) with photon or proton radiotherapy (RT), breathing motion of the target and neighboring organs may result in deviations from the planned dose distribution. The aim of this study was to evaluate the magnitude and dosimetric impact of breathing motion. Results were based on comparing weekly 4D computed tomography (4D CT) scans with the planning CT, using the diaphragm as an anatomical landmark for EC. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 20 EC patients were included in this study. Diaphragm breathing amplitudes and off-sets (changes in position with respect to the planning CT) were determined from delineated left diaphragm structures in weekly 4D CT-scans. The potential dosimetric impact of respiratory motion was shown in several example patients for photon and proton radiotherapy. RESULTS: Variation in diaphragm amplitudes were relatively small and ranged from 0 to 0.8 cm. However, the measured off-sets were larger, ranging from -2.1 to 1.9 cm. Of the 70 repeat CT-scans, the off-set exceeded the ITV-PTV margin of 0.8 cm during expiration in 4 CT-scans (5.7%) and during inspiration in 13 CT-scans (18.6%). The dosimetric validation revealed under- and overdosages in the VMAT and IMPT plans. CONCLUSIONS: Despite relatively constant breathing amplitudes, the variation in the diaphragm position (off-set), and consequently tumor position, was clinically relevant. These motion effects may result in either treatments that miss the target volume, or dose deviations in the form of highly localized over- or underdosed regions.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Radioterapia Guiada por Imagen , Neoplasias Esofágicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Esofágicas/radioterapia , Tomografía Computarizada Cuatridimensional , Humanos , Movimiento (Física) , Radiometría , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador , Respiración
3.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 25(6): 1588-1597, 2018 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29611027

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Extramural venous invasion (EMVI) is a known adverse prognostic factor in patients with colorectal carcinoma. The prevalence and significance of EMVI in esophageal cancer (EC) patients is still unclear. METHODS: From a prospectively maintained database, we retrospectively reviewed the resection specimens of patients with pathologic locally advanced (pT3/T4/N0-3) EC who were treated with curative intent between 2000 and 2015. Patients with previous malignancies and gastroesophageal junction (type II/III) tumors were excluded. Included were 81 patients who underwent surgery alone and 37 patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). EMVI was assessed on hematoxylin and eosin slides and confirmed or excluded by additional Elastica van Gieson staining. Survival was analyzed using a multivariable Cox regression. RESULTS: EMVI was present in 23.5% (n = 19) of patients in the surgery-alone group and 21.6% (n = 8) of patients in the nCRT group. The prevalence of EMVI after surgery alone was significantly high in squamous cell carcinomas and among tumors located in the mid-esophagus, as well as those with lymphovascular invasion (p < 0.05). After nCRT, the presence of EMVI was significantly high in tumors with lymphovascular and perineural tumor growth (p = 0.034). EMVI status was an independent adverse prognostic factor for disease-free survival [hazard ratio (HR) 7.0, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.3-21.8; p =0.001] and overall survival (HR 6.5, 95% CI 2.2-19.1; p = 0.001) in the surgery-alone group for node-positive tumors. CONCLUSIONS: In this study of locally advanced > pT3/N0-3 EC patients, EMVI was present in 23.5% of patients in the surgery-alone group and in 21.6% of patients after nCRT. EMVI was an independent adverse prognostic factor in patients after surgery alone.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/terapia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Esofagectomía , Venas/patología , Adenocarcinoma/secundario , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/secundario , Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Esófago/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Metástasis Linfática , Vasos Linfáticos/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Invasividad Neoplásica , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Nervios Periféricos/patología , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia
5.
World J Surg ; 36(12): 2872-8, 2012 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22965535

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The incidence of esophageal cancer has grown over the recent decades and 30% of esophageal cancer patients are now 75 years or older at the time of diagnosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate trends in management and survival of patients aged 75 years or older with esophageal cancer. METHODS: In the Netherlands cancer registry, we identified all patients aged 75 years or older who were diagnosed with esophageal cancer between 1989 and 2008. Trends in management and survival were analyzed by time period (1989-2001 vs. 2002-2008), TNM stage, and age (75-79, 80-84, and 85+ years). χ2 testing was used to analyze time trends in treatment, Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank testing to estimate survival, and Cox regression model to calculate hazard ratios for death. RESULTS: Some 7,253 patients were included in the study. The surgical resection rate increased over the 1989-2008 period from 8.9 to 12.6% (p=0.028), especially among patients aged 75-79 years (44.6 vs. 55.4%, p<0.001) and patients with TNM stage I disease (12.7 vs. 22.0%, p<0.001). The use of definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) also increased (0.19 vs. 2.20%, p<0.001). Whereas the use of chemotherapy as a single-modality treatment more than doubled (0.64 vs. 1.54%, p=0.004), that of radiotherapy alone decreased (38.1 vs. 31.6%, p<0.001). Although median survival time was marginally higher in the 2002-2008 period than in 1989-2001, overall 5 year survival rates remained low at 6 and 5%, respectively (p<0.001). Five-year survival rate after surgery increased from 16 to 30% (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients of 75 years or older, surgical treatment and use of definitive CRT have increased between 1989 and 2008. Also, an increase in the use of chemotherapy as a single modality was noted. Overall 5 year survival for all cancer patients was stable but remained poor, while survival of patients who underwent esophagectomy improved significantly in the Netherlands since 1989.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/cirugía , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Esofagectomía/tendencias , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidad , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/mortalidad , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/terapia , Terapia Combinada/estadística & datos numéricos , Terapia Combinada/tendencias , Neoplasias Esofágicas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Esofagectomía/mortalidad , Esofagectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Análisis de Supervivencia
6.
Radiother Oncol ; 117(1): 152-8, 2015 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26364884

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) improves survival in esophageal cancer (EC) patients, but the response to treatment is heterogeneous and little is known regarding prognostic and predictive markers in these patients. CD44, SOX2 and SHH have been implicated in resistance to CRT, possibly through an association with a cancer stem cell phenotype. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 101 EC patients treated with nCRT and surgery were included. Sufficient pre-treatment biopsy material was present in 71 patients, of which 53 patients were non-complete responders on nCRT (nCR). Protein expression was examined using immunohistochemistry (IHC). Prognostic factors were determined using Cox regression analysis for disease free survival (DFS) and cause specific survival (CSS) in the complete cohort, the pre-treatment biopsies group and post-treatment nCR group. RESULTS: Low CD44 expression in the nCR group was an independent prognostic factor for both DFS and CSS (DFS HR 2.81, p=0.002 and CSS HR 3.48, p=0.002). Absent SOX2 expression in pretreatment biopsies was related to systemic recurrence (p=0.029) while low SHH in pretreatment biopsies was an independent prognostic factor for a poor DFS (HR 2.27, p=0.036). No relation between marker expression and response to nCRT was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Low expression of CD44 and SHH are associated with a poor survival outcome in EC patients treated with nCRT.


Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores de Tumor/metabolismo , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Anciano , Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Neoplasias Esofágicas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Femenino , Proteínas Hedgehog/metabolismo , Humanos , Receptores de Hialuranos/metabolismo , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Neoadyuvante/métodos , Proteínas de Neoplasias/metabolismo , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Transcripción SOXB1/metabolismo , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA