PENTAZOCINE VERSUS PENTAZOCINE WITH RECTAL DICLOFENAC FOR POSTOPERATIVE PAIN RELIEF AFTER CESAREAN SECTION- A DOUBLE BLIND RANDOMIZED PLACEBO CONTROLLED TRIAL IN A LOW RESOURCE AREA.

BACKGROUND: The unimodal approach of using pentazocine as post-cesarean section pain relief is inadequate, hence the need for a safer, easily available and more effective multimodal approach. AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness of rectal diclofenac combined with intramuscular pentazocine for postoperative pain following cesarean section. METHODS: In this double blind clinical trial, 130 pregnant women scheduled for cesarean section under spinal anesthesia were randomly assigned to two groups. Group A received 100mg diclofenac suppository and group B received placebo suppository immediately following surgery, 12 and 24h later. Both groups also received intramuscular pentazocine 30mg immediately following surgery and 6 hourly postoperatively in the first 24 h. Postoperative pain was assessed by visual analogue scale at end of surgery and 2, 12 and 24 h after surgery. Patient satisfaction scores were also assessed. RESULTS: One hundred and sixteen patients completed the study. Combining diclofenac and pentazocine had statistically significant reduction in pain intensity at 2, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively compared to pentazocine alone (p <0.05). No significant side effects were noted in both groups. The combined group also had significantly better patient satisfaction scores. CONCLUSION: The addition of diclofenac suppository to intramuscular pentazocine provides better pain relief after cesarean section and increased patient satisfaction.

Propofol versus traditional sedative methods for colonoscopy in a low-resource setting.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: We set out to determine the safety and efficacy of the use of three sedative regimens, namely propofol alone, propofol with benzodiazepine and/or opioids and benzodiazepine with opioids in Nigerian patients undergoing diagnostic colonoscopy at a Nigerian tertiary hospital. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 120 patients undergoing outpatient colonoscopy were assigned prospectively to one of the three treatment regimens. Patients in Group A (n = 40) received propofol alone (PRO), Group B (n = 40) received propofol with midazolam and/or fentanyl and Group C (n = 40) received opioids and midazolam (fentanyl and midazolam - conscious sedation). Study outcome measures include the level of sedation, length of the procedure, sedation/recovery time, patient satisfaction and adverse events. RESULTS: Patients receiving PRO alone received higher doses of PRO compared with PRO and additives (P = 0.043). The overall procedure and sedation duration were similar in both PRO containing groups but statistically significantly shorter than the conscious sedation group (P < 0.0001, P < 0.006). The recovery time was statistically shorter in the PRO additives group compared to the other two groups (P < 0.0001). While the drop in blood pressure was similar in all the groups (P = 0.227), the occurrence of hypoxaemia was higher in the PRO containing groups (P < 0.0001). Overall physicians and patients pain assessment scores were statistically different in the three groups (both P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that PRO sedation is safe when used for outpatient diagnostic colonoscopy in low-resource settings with better patients and physician satisfaction. The synergistic sedative effect of midazolam and/or opioids combined with PRO help reducing the dose of PRO used with better recovery.

ASSESSMENT OF PREOPERATIVE AND POSTOPERATIVE ANXIETY AMONG ELECTIVE MAJOR SURGERY PATIENTS IN A TERTIARY HOSPITAL IN NIGERIA.

BACKGROUND: Anxiety is an unpleasant emotional experience that involves feelings of tension, apprehension, nervousness and high autonomic activity. Few studies have been conducted in Nigeria on anxiety levels among patient undergoing surgical operation. The aim of this study is to assess preoperative and postoperative anxiety level of patients and identify factors that may influence patient's preoperative anxiety level. METHODS: Fifty one adult patients scheduled for elective surgery in a tertiary public hospital in Nigeria were assessed a day before and after their surgery using a questionnaire with socio-demographic and clinical details. Anxiety was assessed with the state portion of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) and different factors responsible for their anxiety were selected from a list. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS version 17. RESULT: Twenty-six patients (51.0%) had significant preoperative anxiety while 8 (15.7%) had significant postoperative anxiety. The patients preoperative mean anxiety score of STAI (42.72 ± 9.84) was statistically significantly higher than their postoperative mean anxiety score (37.73 ± 8.44; p = .001). In 10 items of STAI, there were significant differences between the preoperative and postoperative mean STAI scores. Fear of complications and result of operation were the most common factors responsible for preoperative anxiety while few patients were anxious about nil per mouth, getting stuck with needle and harm from doctor/nurse mistake. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of preoperative anxiety is high in Nigerian surgical patients. Psychological preparation and provision of correct information that addresses identified factors may help in reducing preoperative anxiety.

Modified electroconvulsive therapy in a resource-challenged setting: Comparison of two doses (0.5 mg/kg and 1 mg/kg) of suxamethonium chloride.

BACKGROUND: Suxamethonium has been shown to have a superior modification of the convulsion associated with ECT compared to other muscle relaxants. The dosage of suxamethonium used in ECT varies widely based on the experiences of practitioners. The study aimed to determine and compare the effectiveness and side effect profile of 0.5 mg/kg and 1 mg/kg in modified ECT. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This was a prospective randomized crossover study, comparing the effects of suxamethonium at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg, and 1.0 mg/kg in 27 patients who had a total of 54 sessions of modified ECT. The primary outcome parameters were quality of convulsion and onset and duration of apnoea. The secondary outcome parameters were hemodynamic variables, arterial oxygen saturation, delayed recovery, muscle pain, vomiting, headache, prolonged convulsion, and serum potassium. Data collected were entered into proforma and analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 17.0. Parametric variables are presented as means and standard deviations while non-parametric variables are presented as frequencies and percentages. The level of significance (P-value) was considered at 0.05. RESULTS: Sixteen patients (59%) had acceptable convulsion modification with 0.5 mg/kg suxamethonium compared to 23 patients (85%) with the use of 1.0 mg/kg suxamethonium (P = 0.016). There was no statistically significant difference in the duration of convulsion, the onset of apnoea, and the duration of apnoea with the two doses. Changes in heart rate, blood pressure, arterial oxygen saturation, and serum potassium level that accompany the mECT were comparable with the two doses of suxamethonium studied. CONCLUSIONS: A better modification of convulsion with comparable hemodynamic and side effect profile is achieved during mECT with the use of 1.0 mg/kg suxamethonium compared to 0.5 mg/kg.

Pre-operative haematological investigations in paediatric orofacial cleft repair: any relevance to management outcome?

AIM AND OBJECTIVES: To determine the value of routine pre-operative haematologic investigations in children undergoing orofacial cleft repair. BACKGROUND: Although routine pre-operative laboratory screening tests are carried out traditionally, some studies suggest that they are not absolutely necessary in the management of elective surgical patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study carried out at a tertiary health facility located in Nigeria. A review of the laboratory investigations in 116 paediatric orofacial cleft patients undergoing surgery during a 6-year period was undertaken. Pre-operative laboratory investigations and peri-operative transfusion records were analysed for the frequency and impact of abnormal results on treatment plan and outcome using the Statistical Packages for the Social Scientists 16.0. RESULTS: All the children had pre-operative packed cell volume (PCV) check on admission for surgery. The PCV ranged from 23% to 43%, mean was 32.9 (±3.7%). Twenty-two children (18.6%) had sub-optimal PCV (<30%). Patients with the lowest PCV values (23% and 26%) were transfused pre-operatively. The lowest post-operative PCV was 23%, mean 30.8 (±3.3%). There was no occasion of post-operative blood transfusion. Eighty-six patients (72.9%) had full or partial serum electrolyte and urea analysis. Screening for sickle-cell disease was rarely done. Fourteen intra- and post-operative complications were recorded. None of these were predictable by the results of pre-operative screening tests carried out. All the children were discharged home in satisfactory condition. CONCLUSIONS: Routine laboratory testing has minimal impact on management and outcome of orofacial cleft surgeries. However, haematocrit screening may be appropriate, particularly in clinically pale patients.