Living with paradox: A qualitative study of colorectal cancer patients' experiences in managing their health after cancer treatment.

OBJECTIVES: Managing one's health after colorectal cancer may present specific challenges given long-term impacts to biopsychosocial functioning. Understanding experiences of managing one's health post-treatment is important to informing patient-centred supportive care. METHODS: A qualitative study with 19 patients who had completed treatment for colorectal cancer to explore the experience of managing one's health. Following Thorne's Interpretive Description, we conducted interviews using either focus groups or individual interviews. Transcribed data were analysed following Thorne's approach. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were also collected. RESULTS: The metaphor of living with paradox was the main theme characterising the experiences of managing one's health in the post-treatment period. Participants described the ambiguity of health, their need to accept the new normal, losing control and taking back control, experiencing positive and negative life changes, and the need to continually reframe their perspectives to focus on the positives. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that providing patient-centred care to colorectal cancer survivors post-treatment involves recognising their changing and sometimes conflicting experiences. Their ability to manage their health may fluctuate and their supportive care needs may not fit with a particular trajectory. Cancer care systems should strive for flexibility in the structure and timing of support available.

Real-World Safety of Niraparib for Maintenance Treatment of Ovarian Cancer in Canada.

Niraparib was recently funded in Canada for the maintenance treatment of ovarian cancer following platinum-based chemotherapy. However, the drug's safety profile in the real world remains uncertain. We conducted a cohort study to describe the patient population using niraparib and the proportion that experienced adverse events between June 2019 and December 2022 in four Canadian provinces (Ontario, Alberta, British Columbia [BC], and Quebec). We used administrative data and electronic medical records from Ontario Health, Alberta Health Services, and BC Cancer, and registry data from Exactis Innovation. We summarized baseline characteristics using descriptive statistics and reported safety outcomes using cumulative incidence. We identified 514 patients receiving niraparib. Mean age was 67 years and most were initiated on a daily dose of 100 or 200 mg/day. Grade 3/4 anemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia occurred in 11-16% of the cohort. In Ontario, the three-month cumulative incidence of grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia was 11.6% (95% CI, 8.3-15.4%), neutropenia was 7.1% (95% CI, 4.6-10.4%), and anemia was 11.3% (95% CI, 8.0-15.2%). Cumulative incidences in the remaining provinces were similar. Initial daily dose and proportions of hematological adverse events were low in the real world and may be related to cautious prescribing and close monitoring by clinicians.

Top 10 research priorities for early-stage colorectal cancer: a Canadian patient-oriented priority-setting partnership.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer, one of the most commonly diagnosed cancers, is now being detected earlier and treatments are improving, which means that patients are living longer. Partnering with Canadian clinicians, patients and researchers, we aimed to determine research priorities for those living with early-stage colorectal cancer in Canada. METHODS: We followed the well-established priority-setting partnership outlined by the James Lind Alliance to identify and prioritize unanswered questions about early-stage (i.e., stages I-III) colorectal cancer. The study was conducted from September 2018 to September 2020. We surveyed patients, caregivers and clinicians from across Canada between June 2019 and December 2019. We categorized the responses using thematic analysis to generate a list of unique questions. We conducted an interim prioritization survey from April 2020 to July 2020, with patients, caregivers and clinicians, to determine a shorter list of questions, which was then reviewed at a final meeting (involving patients, caregivers and clinicians) in September 2020. At that meeting, we used a consensus-based process to determine the top 10 priorities. RESULTS: For the initial survey, 370 responses were submitted by 185 individuals; of the 98 individuals who provided demographic information, 44 (45%) were patients, 16 (16%) were caregivers, 7 (7%) were members of an advocacy group, 26 (27%) were health care professionals and 5 (5%) were categorized as "other." The responses were refined to create a list of 66 unique unanswered questions. Twenty-five respondents answered the interim prioritization survey: 13 patients (52%), 2 caregivers (8%), 3 advocacy group members (12%) and 7 health care professionals (28%). This led to a list of the top 30 questions. The final consensus meeting involved 20 individuals (10 patients [50%], 3 caregivers [15%] and 7 health care professionals [35%]), who agreed to the top 10 research priorities. The priorities covered a range of topics, including screening, treatment, recurrence, management of adverse effects and decision-making. INTERPRETATION: We determined the top research priorities for early-stage colorectal cancer using a collaborative partnership of stake-holders from across Canada. The priorities covered a broad range of topics that could be addressed by future research, including improved screening practices, the role of personalized medicine, the management of adverse effects of treatment, decision-making and prevention of recurrence.

A Population-based Study of Treatment Patterns and Survival of Patients With De Novo Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Treatment strategies for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are evolving rapidly and can be highly variable. Real-world evidence of treatment patterns and outcomes can provide an understanding of our current practice and offer insights on ways to incorporate emerging therapies into our treatment paradigm. In this population-based study, we investigated treatments and outcomes of stage IV NSCLC patients from a large Canadian province. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with de novo stage IV NSCLC from April 1, 2010 to March 31, 2015 were identified. Data for baseline characteristics, treatments, and outcomes were obtained from provincial data sources, including the cancer registry and electronic medical records. We classified systemic treatments as chemotherapy, targeted therapy (anti-epidermal growth factor receptor, and anti-anaplastic lymphoma kinase) and immunotherapy (checkpoint inhibitors) and characterized clinical outcomes by treatment type. RESULTS: A total of 6438 patients were identified with NSCLC, of whom 3606 (56%) had de novo stage IV disease. The median age of diagnosis was 69 (range: 20 to 100) years and 52.4% were men. First-line palliative treatments included: chemotherapy in 19.5% (n=703), targeted agents in 5.7% (n=204), immunotherapy in 1% (n=1), radiotherapy in 6.8% (n=246), and best supportive care in 74.8% (n=2,698). Median overall survival (mOS) from diagnosis for the whole cohort was 3.8 months. Within subgroups, mOS was 18.0 months for targeted therapies, 9.4 months for chemotherapy, and 2.5 months for best supportive care. Only 1.0% of patients (n=34) received immunotherapy at any line. CONCLUSIONS: Survival benefit was dependent on type of treatment received, with significantly better mOS observed with the use of small-molecule targeted therapy against epidermal growth factor receptor mutations and anaplastic lymphoma kinase rearrangements, as compared with best supportive care.

Population-based Treatment Patterns and Outcomes for Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients: A Real-world Evidence Study.

BACKGROUND: Most patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) develop metastases and succumb to their cancer. Approaches to the treatment of stage III disease can be highly variable. Understanding current treatment patterns can inform the optimal integration of emerging therapies. In this study, we describe contemporary treatment patterns and outcomes for a population-based cohort of stage III NSCLC patients from a large Canadian province. METHODS: On the basis of the provincial cancer registry, all adult patients diagnosed with stage III NSCLC from April 1, 2010 to March 31, 2015 were identified. Analyses of these patients' existing electronic medical records and administrative claims data were conducted to describe patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and survival outcomes. RESULTS: In total, we screened 6438 patients diagnosed with NSCLC, of whom 1151 (17.9%) had stage III disease. Among them, 61.2% were stage IIIA, 36.4% were stage IIIB, and 2.4% were unspecified. Median age at diagnosis was 70 (22 to 94) years and 50.2% were men. In this cohort, a significant proportion of patients received only palliative radiotherapy (35.6%), palliative chemotherapy (8.8%), or best supportive care (24.8%) as initial treatment. Conversely, relatively few underwent concurrent chemoradiotherapy (11.7%) or trimodality therapy (1.7%). Surgery±adjuvant treatments were performed in 14.8% of stage III patients. Median overall survival was 13.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 12.2-14.0) among stage III patients. Patients who received initial curative treatment had statistically significant better survival compared with those who received noncurative treatment (P<0.001); median overall survival 29.8 months (95% CI, 22.3-34.6) and 8.9 months (95% CI, 7.6-11.6), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In a population-based setting that includes community, regional, and tertiary cancer centers, use of concurrent chemoradiotherapy and trimodality therapy in stage III NSCLC was low despite evidence supporting the potential benefits of these strategies.