American Board of Emergency Medicine Report on Residency and Fellowship Training Information (2021-2022).

The American Board of Emergency Medicine gathers extensive background information on the Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education-accredited emergency medicine residency and fellowship programs, as well as the residents and fellows training in those programs. We present the 2022 annual report on the status of physicians training in Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education-accredited emergency medicine training programs in the United States.

Emergency contraception: what do our patients know?

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Unintended pregnancy is a major medical, social, and public health problem. Emergency contraceptive pills can prevent 75% to 85% of unintended pregnancies if administered within 72 hours of intercourse. We perform this study to measure knowledge, attitudes, practices, and perceived needs about emergency contraception in a sample of women seeking emergency department (ED) care. METHODS: This was a prospective survey of women presenting to an inner-city ED during an 8-week study period. Women who were aged 18 to 45 years, English speaking, and not critically ill and who presented during 56 randomly generated 4-hour time blocks were eligible. Trained research assistants administered a 20-question survey that included questions on current sexual and contraceptive practices and knowledge, acceptance, and preferences about postcoital contraception. RESULTS: Two hundred thirty-two women met eligibility criteria; 158 (68%) women agreed to participate. Participants and nonparticipants were similar in age, race, ethnicity, and insurance status. The participants' mean age was 30 years. Twenty-five percent were married, whereas 49% had never married and 25% were separated or divorced. Fifty-two percent (95% confidence interval [CI] 44% to 60%) reported at least 1 previous unintended pregnancy; 28% (95% CI 21% to 35%) had 1 or more previous elective abortions. Of women who had been sexually active in the past month, half (47%) reported unprotected intercourse during that time. Among all respondents, 122 (77%; 95% CI 71% to 84%) had heard of emergency contraception as a way of preventing pregnancy after unprotected intercourse. Of these respondents, one fourth to one half did not have enough knowledge to use emergency contraceptive pills effectively. Fifty-seven percent of women were willing to use emergency contraceptive pills in the future, and 16 women said they would consider a change in regular contraception to emergency contraceptive pills if widely available. CONCLUSION: Sexually active women seeking ED care have high rates of unintended pregnancy and abortion. There is broad acceptance of emergency contraceptive pills to prevent pregnancy, but knowledge of availability, timing, and proper use is limited. Emergency contraceptive pills are a safe, effective, and low-cost primary preventive and emergency care intervention, and information about their use should be made available to ED patients. Patients should be advised not to abandon their use of barrier or other traditional contraceptives.

Prospective validation of Wells Criteria in the evaluation of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The literature suggests that the d -dimer is useful in patients suspected of having pulmonary embolism and who have a low pretest probability of disease. A previously defined clinical decision rule, the Wells Criteria, may provide a reliable and reproducible means of determining this pretest probability. We evaluate the interrater agreement and external validity of Wells Criteria in determining pretest probability in patients suspected of having pulmonary embolism. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study. Trained research assistants enrolled patients during 120 random 8-hour shifts. Patients who underwent imaging for pulmonary embolism after a medical history, physical examination, and chest radiograph were enrolled. Treating providers and research assistants determined pretest probability according to Wells Criteria in a blinded fashion. Two d -dimer assays were run. Three-month follow-up for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism was performed. Interrater agreement tables were created. kappa Values, sensitivities, and specificities were determined. RESULTS: Of the 153 eligible patients, 3 patients were missed, 16 patients declined, and 134 (88%) patients were enrolled. Sixteen (12%) patients were diagnosed with pulmonary embolism. The kappa values for Wells Criteria were 0.54 and 0.72 for the trichotomized and dichotomized scorings, respectively. When Wells Criteria were trichotomized into low pretest probability (n=59, 44%), moderate pretest probability (n=61, 46%), or high pretest probability (n=14, 10%), the pulmonary embolism prevalence was 2%, 15%, and 43%, respectively. When Wells Criteria were dichotomized into pulmonary embolism-unlikely (n=88, 66%) or pulmonary embolism-likely (n=46, 34%), the prevalence was 3% and 28%, respectively. The immunoturbidimetric and rapid enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay d -dimer assays had similar sensitivities (94%) and specificities (45% versus 46%). CONCLUSION: Wells Criteria have a moderate to substantial interrater agreement and reliably risk stratify pretest probability in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.

Violence-inflicted injuries: reporting laws in the fifty states.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Physicians have an important role in the diagnosis, treatment, and documentation of violence-inflicted injuries. Physicians may also be legally mandated to report these assault-related injuries to law enforcement. Previous studies have shown that physicians may not be aware of the reporting laws in their state. The objective of this study was to review the reporting laws for violence-inflicted injuries in adults in the 50 states and the District of Columbia, with particular emphasis on domestic violence. METHODS: Members of a domestic violence research interest group contacted individual state legislatures regarding mandated reporting by health providers of violence-inflicted injuries in adults. This information was then verified by each state's domestic violence coalition. Statutes regarding child abuse or sexual assault and statutes concerning injuries in incapacitated adults were not included in this study. RESULTS: Five states (Alabama, New Mexico, South Carolina, Washington, and Wyoming) have no specific reporting requirements for health providers treating patients with assault-related injuries. Forty-two states have reporting requirements for injuries resulting from firearms, knives, or other weapons. Twenty-three states have reporting requirements for injuries resulting from crimes. Seven states have statutes that specifically require health providers to report injuries resulting from domestic violence. CONCLUSION: Forty-five states have laws that mandate physician reports of injuries caused by weapons, crimes, or domestic violence. Physicians need to be aware of the existence of these laws and of their state's specific requirements.