A CASE OF KRETSCHMER’S SENSITIVE DELUSION RELATED TO COVID-19 PANDEMIC.

The COVID-19 pandemic has already infected more than 182 million people and killed more than 4 million all over the globe. In addition to its direct health effects, lockdowns and other draconian public health measures, along with an expected economic crisis of unprecedent magnitude, unpre- dictable social effects are being generated.

Electromyographic assessment of blink reflex throughout the transition from responsiveness to unresponsiveness during induction with propofol and remifentanil.

General anesthesia is a reversible drug-induced state of altered arousal characterized by loss of responsiveness due to brainstem inactivation. Precise identification of the moment in which responsiveness is lost during the induction of general anesthesia is extremely important to provide information regarding an individual's anesthetic requirements and help intraoperative drug titration. To characterize the transition from responsiveness to unresponsiveness more objectively, we studied neurophysiologic-derived parameters of electromyographic records of electrically evoked blink reflex as a means of identifying the precise moment of loss of responsiveness. Twenty-five patients received a slow infusion of propofol until loss of corneal reflex while successive blink reflexes were elicited and recorded every 6 s. The level of anesthesia was assessed using an adapted version of the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale. Different variables of the blink reflex components were calculated and compared to the adapted version of the Richmond Agitation-Sedation score and the estimated effect-site propofol concentration. Baselines of the blink reflex responses were similar to those in literature. After propofol infusion started, the most susceptible component of the blink reflex to propofol was R2 (EC50 = 1.358 (95% CI 1.321, 1.396) µg/mL) and the most resistant was R1 (EC50 = 3.025 (95% CI 2.960, 3.090) µg/mL). Most of the patients (24 out of 25) lost the R1 component when they were still responsive to shaking and shouting and corneal reflex could be elicited clinically (time = 102.48 ± 33.00 s). Habituation was present in R2 but not in R1. The R1 component of the blink reflex was found to have a strong correlation with the adapted version of the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale, with amplitude correlating better than areas (ρ = - 0.721 (0.123) versus ρ = - 0.688 (0.165)). We found a strong correlation between the R1 component with the estimated propofol effect-site concentration, with amplitude correlating better than areas (ρ = - 0.838 (0.113) versus ρ = - 0.823 (0.153)) and between the clinical scale and the propofol concentration (ρ = 0.856 (0.060)). The area and amplitude of the R1 component showed to be indicators of predicting different levels of anesthesia (Pk = 0.672 (0.183) versus Pk = 0.709 (0.134)) and these are connected to the propofol concentrations (Pk = 0.593 (0.10)). Our results suggest that electrically evoked blink reflex could be used during the induction of anesthesia as a surrogate of the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale to provide an objective endpoint as far as a - 4. At this point, at the moment of loss of R1, the propofol infusion may be stopped, as overshooting increases slightly the effect-site concentration afterward and eventually reaching loss of responsiveness. If the desired target is not achieved, the infusion can then be resumed.

Performance of blink reflex in patients during anesthesia induction with propofol and remifentanil: prediction probabilities and multinomial logistic analysis.

BACKGROUND: The amount of propofol needed to induce loss of responsiveness varied widely among patients, and they usually required less than the initial dose recommended by the drug package inserts. Identifying precisely the moment of loss of responsiveness will determine the amount of propofol each patient needs. Currently, methods to decide the exact moment of loss of responsiveness are based on subjective analysis, and the monitors that use objective methods fail in precision. Based on previous studies, we believe that the blink reflex can be useful to characterize, more objectively, the transition from responsiveness to unresponsiveness. The purpose of this study is to investigate the relation between the electrically evoked blink reflex and the level of sedation/anesthesia measured with an adapted version of the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale, during the induction phase of general anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil. Adding the blink reflex to other variables may allow a more objective assessment of the exact moment of loss of responsiveness and a more personalized approach to anesthesia induction. RESULTS: The electromyographic-derived features proved to be good predictors to estimate the different levels of sedation/anesthesia. The results of the multinomial analysis showed a reasonable performance of the model, explaining almost 70% of the adapted Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale variance. The overall predictive accuracy for the model was 73.6%, suggesting that it is useful to predict loss of responsiveness. CONCLUSIONS: Our developed model was based on the information of the electromyographic-derived features from the blink reflex responses. It was able to predict the drug effect in patients undergoing general anesthesia, which can be helpful for the anesthesiologists to reduce the overwhelming variability observed between patients and avoid many cases of overdosing and associated risks. Despite this, future research is needed to account for variabilities in the clinical response of the patients and with the interactions between propofol and remifentanil. Nevertheless, a method that could allow for an automatic prediction/detection of loss of responsiveness is a step forward for personalized medicine.

Manic states related to antidepressant withdrawal - a case report and literature review

ABSTRACT Background: A manic state induced by antidepressant withdrawal is a rare clinical occurrence that has been increasingly reported in the last decades and currently represents a nosological entity with specified criteria. Objectives: This paper aims to report a case of mania induced by escitalopram withdrawal in a patient with unipolar depression. Furtherly, we intend to review the published case reports of manic states induced by antidepressant withdrawal, analysing its epidemiology and discussing the current theories concerning its pathophysiology. Methods: We conducted a search in PubMed database in July 2019, without restriction by year of publication, and selected case reports and literature reviews in English, which were fully read. Results: Only 29 reported cases fulfil the most accepted diagnostic criteria. This phenomenon is more frequent in patients with unipolar depression, may occur with any major class of antidepressant and it is still unclear whether it indicates a latent bipolar disorder. Our case report is the third case associated with the use of escitalopram published in the literature. Conclusion: Although a rare phenomenon, mania induced by antidepressant withdrawal poses relevant clinical challenges and its possible pathophysiological processes may shed some light on the mechanisms underlying affective disorders.

Encefalitis sensible a esteroides asociada con tiroiditis autoinmune como paradigma del diagnóstico diferencial neuropsiquiátrico: informe de caso y revisión / Steroid-responsive auto-immune encephalitis as a paradigm of neuropsychiatric differential diagnosis: case report and review

No disponible