RESUMEN
Introduction: Meningiomas are the most common central nervous system tumor in adults. Knowledge of the tumor grade can guide optimal treatment timing and shape personalized follow-up strategies. Positron emission tomography (PET) has been utilized for the metabolic assessment of various intracranial space-occupying lesions. Herewith, we set out to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of PET for the noninvasive assessment of meningioma's grade. Materials and methods: The Medline, Scopus and Cochrane databases were systematically searched in March 2022 for studies that evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of PET compared to the gold standard of histological diagnosis in the grading of meningiomas. Summary statistics will be calculated and scatter plots, summary curve from the HSROC model and posterior predictions by empirical Bayes estimates will be presented. Results: Five studies consisting of 242 patients with a total of 196 low-grade (Grade 1) and 46 high grade (Grade 2/3) meningiomas were included in our analysis. Three of the included studies used 18F-FDG, one study used 18F-FLT and one used(Whiting et al., 2011) 18 F-FET as PET tracers. The pooled sensitivity was 76% (95% CI: 52%-91%) and the pooled specificity was 89% (95% CI: 83%-93%). The diagnostic odds ratio was 27.17 (95% CI: 9.22-80.06), the positive likelihood ratio was 7.18 (95% CI: 4.54-11.34) and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.26 (95% CI: 0.11-0.61). Conclusion: PET is a promising and viable option as a noninvasive imaging tool to differentiate the meningioma grades. However, currently it cannot overtake the gold standard of histological grade confirmation. More studies are required for further validation and refinement of this imaging technique and assessment of other radiotracers as well.
RESUMEN
Background: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) promised to transform the management of peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC). Forty years since the introduction of the technique, published data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) remain scarce. We assessed the cumulative comprehensive available evidence on the use of HIPEC in gastrointestinal (GI) and biliary tract malignancies and established the current benchmark for GI HIPEC research in both the prevention and treatment of peritoneal metastases. Methods: RCTs were identified through a systematic search of Medline, Cochrane and Embase databases. Overall survival and progression-free survival were the outcomes of interest. Results: The search resulted in 13 RCTs for gastric cancer (10 on prophylactic and 3 on therapeutic HIPEC), 4 for colorectal cancer (2 on prophylactic and 2 on therapeutic HIPEC), and 1 for pancreatic cancer. No RCTs were identified that included other types of GI or biliary tract cancers. Current randomized evidence does not support any overall survival benefit from the use of HIPEC in the adjuvant setting for gastric cancer or for colorectal cancer in any setting. Despite the survival benefit noticed in the treatment of PC from gastric cancer (risk ratio 0.85, 95% confidence interval 0.77-0.93; P<0.001), the results were derived from only 190 patients. Conclusions: The current evidence from RCTs does not support the use of HIPEC in the treatment/prevention of PC in GI and biliary tract malignancies. HIPEC should continue to be considered experimental until level 1 evidence from properly designed international multicenter studies becomes available.
RESUMEN
Aims: The standard of surgical treatment for lower limb neoplasms had been characterized by highly interventional techniques, leading to severe kinetic impairment of the patients and incidences of phantom pain. Rotationplasty had arisen as a potent limb salvage treatment option for young cancer patients with lower limb bone tumours, but its impact on the gait through comparative studies still remains unclear several years after the introduction of the procedure. The aim of this study is to assess the effect of rotationplasty on gait parameters measured by gait analysis compared to healthy individuals. Methods: The MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane databases were systematically searched without time restriction until 10 January 2022 for eligible studies. Gait parameters measured by gait analysis were the outcomes of interest. Results: Three studies were eligible for analyses. Compared to healthy individuals, rotationplasty significantly decreased gait velocity (-1.45 cm/sec; 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.98 to -0.93; p < 0.001), stride length (-1.20 cm; 95% CI -2.31 to -0.09; p < 0.001), cadence (-0.83 stride/min; 95% (CI -1.29 to -0.36; p < 0.001), and non-significantly increased cycle time (0.54 sec; 95% CI -0.42 to 1.51; p = 0.184). Conclusion: Rotationplasty is a valid option for the management of lower limb bone tumours in young cancer patients. Larger studies, with high patient accrual, refined surgical techniques, and well planned rehabilitation strategies, are required to further improve the reported outcomes of this procedure.
RESUMEN
Prosthetic reconstructive procedures have become the mainstay in contemporary surgical treatment following resection of extremity bone neoplasms. Given that these patients are of young age most of the time, achievement of robust functional outcomes is of paramount importance. The aim of this study is to assess the impact of this procedure on the gait parameters of cancer patients compared to healthy individuals. The Medline, Scopus and Cochrane databases were systematically searched until January 2022 for eligible studies. Gait parameters measured by gait analysis after prosthetic reconstruction were the outcomes of interest. Eight cohort studies were included in our analysis. From these, seven studied prosthetic reconstruction of the knee (distal femur or proximal tibia) and only one exclusively studied prostetic reconstructions of the proximal femur. Compared to healthy individuals a significant decrease was evident in gait velocity (-0.16 m/sec, 95 %CI: -0.23 to -0.09, p-value < 0.001), in stride length (-6.07 %height, 95 %CI: -9,36 to -2.78, p-value < 0.001), in cadence (-3.96 stride/min, 95 %CI: -5.41 to -2.51, p-value < 0.001) and significant increase in cycle time (0.10 s, 95 %CI: 0.03 to 0.17, p-value = 0.005). Prosthetic reconstruction following lower limb tumor resection significantly affects the gait of patients. This knowledge can be utilized for further refinement of surgical techniques, rehabilitation strategies and follow-up programming.