Supporting the applicability and transferability of the "Sortir Ensemble & Se Respecter" program in France / Accompagner l'applicabilité et la transférabilité du programme « Sortir Ensemble & Se Respecter ¼ en Frances

INTRODUCTION: The prevention of intimate partner violence (IPV) among young people is a major challenge for public policies. Nevertheless, there are a few prevention programs that have proven effective in France. "Sortir Ensemble & Se Respecter" (SE&SR) is a Swiss adaptation of "Safe Dates," an American intervention program that has reduced violent behavior by young perpetrators and victims of IPV alike. The aim of this article is to analyze the applicability and "potential transferability" of SE&SR in France. METHODS: We described the SE&SR intervention by explaining the intervention theory, the key functions (i.e., the "ingredients" allowing the SE&SR program to work), and we commented on its applicability from a perspective of adapting and transferring it to the French context. We used the ASTAIRE tool and the FIC (key functions, implementation, context) approach. RESULTS: The intervention theory highlighted various factors, acting at the individual level (i.e., beliefs/representations, knowledge, life skills) and at the level of the living environment (i.e., facilities welcoming young people; families; public policies; networks of actors), that can prevent IPV among young people. Ten key functions have been identified, revealing the "skeleton" of the Swiss intervention. We drew on these results to comment on the intervention's applicability, with a view to transferability, specifying the contextual elements to consider before implementing SE&SR in France. CONCLUSION: This study aims to make the process of evaluating applicability, with a view to transferring an evidence-based program to the French context, more accessible.

Introduction: La prévention des violences dans les relations amoureuses (VRA) chez les jeunes est un enjeu fort des politiques publiques. Néanmoins, il existe peu de programmes de prévention ayant fait la preuve de leur efficacité en France. « Sortir Ensemble & Se Respecter ¼ (SE&SR) est une adaptation suisse de « Safe Dates ¼, un programme d'intervention américain qui a montré des résultats en matière de réduction des comportements violents tant du côté des jeunes victimes que des auteurs. L'objectif de cet article est d'analyser l'applicabilité et la « potentielle transférabilité ¼ de SE&SR en France. Méthodes: L'approche adoptée consistait à décrire l'intervention SE&SR en explicitant la théorie d'intervention, les fonctions clés (soit les « ingrédients ¼ permettant que le programme SE&SR fonctionne) et en proposant des commentaires d'applicabilité en vue d'une transférabilité adaptée au contexte français. L'outil ASTAIRE et la démarche FIC ont été utilisés. Résultats: La théorie d'intervention a mis en évidence différents facteurs, agissant au niveau individuel (i.e. connaissances, croyances/représentations, compétences psychosociales) et au niveau des milieux de vie (i.e. structures accueillant les jeunes, familles, politiques publiques/réseaux d'acteurs), qui peuvent prévenir les VRA chez les jeunes. Dix fonctions clés ont été identifiées, dégageant le « squelette ¼ de l'intervention suisse. À la suite de ces résultats, des commentaires d'applicabilité en vue d'une transférabilité ont permis de préciser les éléments de contexte à prendre en compte avant la mise en œuvre de SE&SR en France. Conclusion: Cette étude souhaite rendre accessibles les process d'applicabilité en vue d'une transférabilité d'un programme probant en contexte français.

When the messenger is more important than the message: an experimental study of evidence use in francophone Africa.

BACKGROUND: Epistemic injustices are increasingly decried in global health. This study aims to investigate whether the source of knowledge influences the perception of that knowledge and the willingness to use it in francophone African health policy-making context. METHODS: The study followed a randomized experimental design in which participants were randomly assigned to one of seven policy briefs that were designed with the same scientific content but with different organizations presented as authors. Each organization was representative of financial, scientific or moral authority. For each type of authority, two organizations were proposed: one North American or European, and the other African. RESULTS: The initial models showed that there was no significant association between the type of authority or the location of the authoring organization and the two outcomes (perceived quality and reported instrumental use). Stratified analyses highlighted that policy briefs signed by the African donor organization (financial authority) were perceived to be of higher quality than policy briefs signed by the North American/European donor organization. For both perceived quality and reported instrumental use, these analyses found that policy briefs signed by the African university (scientific authority) were associated with lower scores than policy briefs signed by the North American/European university. CONCLUSIONS: The results confirm the significant influence of sources on perceived global health knowledge and the intersectionality of sources of influence. This analysis allows us to learn more about organizations in global health leadership, and to reflect on the implications for knowledge translation practices.

RéSUMé: CONTEXTE: Les injustices épistémiques sont de plus en plus décriées dans le domaine de la santé mondiale. Cette étude vise à déterminer si la source des connaissances influence la perception de ces connaissances et la volonté de les utiliser. MéTHODES: L'étude suit un devis expérimental randomisé dans lequel les participant·es ont été assigné·es au hasard à l'une des sept notes politiques conçues avec le même contenu scientifique, mais avec différentes organisations présentées comme autrices. Chaque organisation était représentative d'une autorité financière, scientifique ou morale. Pour chaque type d'autorité, deux organisations étaient proposées : l'une nord-américaine ou européenne, l'autre africaine. RéSULTATS: Les résultats montrent que le type d'autorité et la localisation des organisations autrices ne sont pas significativement associés à la qualité perçue et à l'utilisation instrumentale déclarée. Toutefois, des interactions entre le type d'autorité et la localisation étaient significatives. Ainsi, les analyses stratifiées ont mis en évidence que pour la qualité perçue, les notes de politique signées par l'organisme bailleur (autorité financière) africain obtenaient de meilleurs scores que les notes de politique signées par l'organisme bailleur nord-américain / européen. Tant pour la qualité perçue que pour l'utilisation instrumentale déclarée, ces analyses stratifiées ont révélé que les notes de politique signées par l'université africaine (autorité scientifique) étaient associées à des scores plus faibles que les notes de politique signées par l'université nord-américaine/européenne. INTERPRéTATION: Les résultats confirment l'influence significative des sources sur la perception des connaissances en santé mondiale et rappellent l'intersectionnalité de l'influence des sources d'autorité. Cette analyse nous permet à la fois d'en apprendre davantage sur les organisations qui dominent la scène de la gouvernance mondiale en santé et de réfléchir aux implications pour les pratiques d'application des connaissances.

Créer une communauté de pratique sur la recherche interventionnelle en santé mondiale.

INTRODUCTION: In the French-speaking world, specifically in France, intervention research in global health has yet to be fully developed institutionally. The Institute of Research for Development (IRD) is one of the major public actors in global health research in France. Within this institute, researchers publish and communicate little on intervention research despite the fact that this is part of their daily work. This is why, for the past several years, the health and society department of the IRD has been working towards institutionalizing a network of IRD actors in population health intervention research (PHIR). OBJECTIVE: The objective of this article is to analyze the needs of global health actors and elements that will allow for the construction of a community of practice in order to initiate an institutional anchoring of intervention research in global health through the mobilization of IRD actors. METHOD: Qualitative research was carried out in 2017 including individual and group interviews. The results yielded several observations: 1) a definition of PHIR that differs according to the participants, 2) a need to strengthen formal and informal interactions to respond to the need for training and sharing experiences, to reinforce encounters and interpersonal bonds, to increase communication and visibility of implemented actions, 3) the participants’ desire to evolve together to overcome certain inherent challenges of global health such as interdisciplinarity, North-South partnerships, or communication with different populations. CONCLUSION: Conducting population health intervention research requires a certain amount of reflection on the ways in which research is done and implies significant changes in the daily lives and work of researchers. It is essential to have institutional support to develop this, such as a community of practice. However, the absence of this community of practice three years later illustrates the operational challenges of implementing such an initiative.

[Evaluation of social inequalites in health of road accident victims in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso]. / Évaluation des inégalités sociales de santé des traumatisés de la route à Ouagadougou au Burkina Faso.

INTRODUCTION: Each year, more than 1.2 million deaths in the world are due to road accidents. It is the leading cause of mortality in young people between the ages of 15 and 29 years. Road accidents and associated injuries have a major impact on health and development. Many international reports have evaluated the mortality and morbidity related to road accidents, but these studies are based on limited data, often with limited robustness. Based on a study conducted in Ouagadougou, the capital of Burkina Faso, to estimate the mortality and morbidity of road accident victims, the objective of this article was to evaluate social, spatial and health inequalities of populations killed or injured as a result of a road accident. METHODS: Between February and July 2015, all road accidents were recorded by policemen using a mobile telephone data collection system, including geolocation of accidents. Three quantitative and prospective survey phases were then performed on injured patients admitted to Yalgado Ouedraogo hospital, the reference centre for these patients. RESULTS: A total of 1,867 emergency department admissions were reported. The majority (95%) of road accident victims were vulnerable users. More than 30% of accidents occurred in one central quarter and two peripheral quarters. The mean management time as 1 hour 3 minutes for victims rescued by firemen and 3 hours 10 minutes for those who attended the emergency department on their own. The mean total cost of management was 126,799 CFA francs (€193) [400-2,000,000 CFA francs]. DISCUSSION: These results identify possible actions designed to reduce road accident injuries and their consequences. They demonstrate that the creation of surveillance systems common to police forces, rescue and health care services are essential to produce convincing data.

[Equity and social determinants of road traffic injuries in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso]. / Équité et déterminants sociaux des accidents de la circulation à Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.

This pilot study shows that it is possible to create an effective framework to obtain data concerning the social determinants of health for road traffic injuries, and that actions in favour of equity must be initiated..

The Influence of Educational Determinants on Children's Health: A Scoping Review of Reviews.

Objectives: Education is one of the most important social determinants shaping the development and wellbeing of children. The purpose of this review of reviews is to inform policymakers, practitioners and public health stakeholder involved in developing child-friendly policies outside of the healthcare system. Methods: We carried out a scoping review of reviews. It included 32 reviews. Results: We identified four main categories of educational determinants in relation to children's health: 1) the organization and structure of educational activities, 2) the interpersonal relations in the educational facilities and structures, 3) the spatial environment of educational facilities and structures, 4) social inequalities in the educational facilities and structures. This last category highlighted the capacity of education system to act on inequalities derived from the way social structures are organized. Conclusion: We suggest a conceptual framework for action which distinguishes structural determinant (gender, race, social class, etc.) and structuring determinant (public policy, systems of governance, organization of cultures/values consideration). Finally, we discuss on how these social structures and structuring determinants influence the intermediary educational determinants collated in the review.

Pour une santé publique en faveur d'une justice épistémique.

La santé publique s'oriente de plus en plus vers l'étude des structures oppressives (telles que le racisme, le sexisme, ou le validisme) et de leur influence sur le marché de l'emploi, les systèmes éducatifs et judiciaires, et l'accès aux systèmes de santé de qualité. Ce commentaire vise à proposer une réflexion sur la manière dont ces structures influencent également la façon de faire de la santé publique. À travers le concept d'injustice épistémique, qui décrit le fait que l'organisation sociale influence la possibilité de connaître et de faire valoir sa connaissance dans une société donnée, nous montrons qu'en tant qu'acteur.rice de santé publique, nous pouvons reproduire et renforcer des injustices sociales. Les injustices épistémiques sont la plupart du temps le fruit de structures et de pratiques quotidiennes. Il est nécessaire de développer l'utilisation d'outils permettant de favoriser la réflexivité pour faciliter la mise en perspective des injustices et des privilèges.

Environment and child well-being: A scoping review of reviews to guide policies.

Background: Acting on social determinants is the most effective, efficient, and fairest strategy to improve population health and health equity. Because of their vulnerability and dependence, children are particularly exposed to the deleterious effects of their living environment. Taking these issues into account in the development of public policies and identifying levers for action are crucial. The objective of this scoping review of reviews is to identify the main environmental determinants on children's health and development, and their mechanisms of effect, to be addressed by public policies. Methods: We conducted a scoping review of reviews in accordance with the method developed by Arksey and O'Malley, and Levac and colleagues' methodology advancement and the PRISMA guideline. Inclusion criteria were identified with the PICos (population-phenomena of interest-context-study design) framework. We used the PubMed database and conducted a thematic analyze. Results: Forty-seven articles were selected. Their analysis allowed us to identify five categories of interdependent environmental determinants of child health: i) urban design ii) contaminants, iii) parenting environment, iv) social conditions, v) climate change. Together and in a systemic way, they act on the health of the child. Conclusion: The review carried out allows us to propose a pragmatic framework for clarifying the effects of the physical, social, and economic environment on children's health and wellbeing.

Does the gap between health workers' expectations and the realities of implementing a performance-based financing project in Mali create frustration?

BACKGROUND: Performance-Based Financing (PBF), an innovative health financing initiative, was recently implemented in Mali. PBF aims to improve quality of care by motivating health workers. The purpose of this research was to identify and understand how health workers' expectations related to their experiences of the first cycle of payment of PBF subsidies, and how this experience affected their motivation and sentiments towards the intervention. We pose the research question, "how does the process of PBF subsidies impact the motivation of health workers in Mali?" METHODS: We adopted a qualitative approach using multiple case studies. We chose three district hospitals (DH 1, 2 and 3) in three health districts (district 1, 2 and 3) among the ten in the Koulikoro region. Our cases correspond to the three DHs. We followed the principle of data source triangulation; we used 53 semi-directive interviews conducted with health workers (to follow the principle of saturuation), field notes, and documents relating to the distribution grids of subsidies for each DH. We analyzed data in a mixed deductive and inductive manner. RESULTS: The results show that the PBF subsidies led to health workers feeling more motivated to perform their tasks overall. Beyond financial motivation, this was primarily due to PBF allowing them to work more efficiently. However, respondents perceived a discrepancy between the efforts made and the subsidies received. The fact that their expectations were not met led to a sense of frustration and disappointment. Similarly, the way in which the subsidies were distributed and the lack of transparency in the distribution process led to feelings of unfairness among the vast majority of respondents. The results show that frustrations can build up in the early days of the intervention. CONCLUSION: The PBF implementation in Mali left health workers frustrated. The short overall implementation period did not allow actors to adjust their initial expectations and motivational responses, neither positive nor negative. This underlines how short-term interventions might not just lack impact, but instil negative sentiments likely to carry on into the future.

Use of infographics as a health-related knowledge translation tool: protocol for a scoping review.

INTRODUCTION: Efforts to bridge the know-do gap have paved the way for development of the field of knowledge translation (KT). KT aims to understand how evidence use can best be promoted and supported through different activities. For dissemination activities, infographics are gaining in popularity as a promising KT tool to reach multiple health research users (eg, health practitioners, patients and families, decision-makers). However, to our knowledge, no study has yet mapped the available evidence on this tool using a systematic method. This scoping review will explore the depth and breadth of evidence on infographics use and its effectiveness in improving research uptake (eg, raising awareness, influencing attitudes, increasing knowledge, informing practice and changing behaviour). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will use the scoping review methodological framework first proposed by Arksey and O'Malley (2005), improved by Levac et al, and further refined by the Joanna Briggs Institute (2020). The search will be conducted in MEDLINE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycINFO, Social Science Abstracts, Library and Information Science Abstracts, Education Resources Information Center, Cairn and Google Scholar. We will also search for relevant literature from the reference lists of the included publications. Two independent reviewers will select the studies. All study designs will be eligible for inclusion, with no date or publication status restrictions. The included studies will have evaluated infographics that disseminate health research evidence and target a non-scientific audience. A data extraction form will be developed and used to extract and chart the data, which will then be synthesised to present a descriptive summary of the results. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is not required. To inform the research and KT communities, various dissemination activities will be developed, including user-friendly KT tools (eg, webinars, fact sheets and infographics), open-access publication and presentations at KT events and conferences.

The negative self-perceived health of migrants with precarious status in Montreal, Canada: A cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Knowledge about the health impacts of the absence of health insurance for migrants with precarious status (MPS) in Canada is scarce. MPS refer to immigrants with authorized but temporary legal status (i.e. temporary foreign workers, visitors, international students) and/or unauthorized status (out of legal status, i.e. undocumented). This is the first large empirical study that examines the social determinants of self-perceived health of MPS who are uninsured and residing in Montreal. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Between June 2016 and September 2017, we performed a cross-sectional survey of uninsured migrants in Montreal, Quebec. Migrants without health insurance (18+) were sampled through venue-based recruitment, snowball strategy and media announcements. A questionnaire focusing on sociodemographic, socioeconomic and psychosocial characteristics, social determinants, health needs and access to health care, and health self-perception was administered to 806 individuals: 54.1% were recruited in urban spaces and 45.9% in a health clinic. 53.9% were categorized as having temporary legal status in Canada and 46% were without authorized status. Regions of birth were: Asia (5.2%), Caribbean (13.8%), Europe (7.3%), Latin America (35.8%), Middle East (21%), Sub-Saharan Africa (15.8%) and the United States (1.1%). The median age was 37 years (range:18-87). The proportion of respondents reporting negative (bad/fair) self-perception of health was 44.8%: 36.1% among migrants with authorized legal status and 54.4% among those with unauthorized status (statistically significant difference; p<0.001). Factors associated with negative self-perceived health were assessed using logistic regression. Those who were more likely to perceive their health as negative were those: with no diploma/primary/secondary education (age-adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 2.49 [95% CI 1.53-4.07, p<0.001] or with a college diploma (AOR: 2.41 [95% CI 1.38-4.20, p = 0.002); whose family income met their needs not at all/a little (AOR: 6.22 [95% CI 1.62-23.85], p = 0.008) or met their needs fairly (AOR: 4.70 [95% CI 1.21-18.27], p = 0.025); with no one whom they could ask for money (AOR: 1.60 [95% CI 1.05-2.46], p = 0.03); with perception of racism (AOR: 1.58 [95% CI 1.01-2.48], p = 0.045); with a feeling of psychological distress (AOR: 2.17 [95% CI 1.36-3.45], p = 0.001); with unmet health care needs (AOR: 3.45 [95% CI 2.05-5.82], p<0.001); or with a health issue in the past 12 months (AOR: 3.44 [95% CI 1.79-6.61], p<0.001). Some variables that are associated with negative self-perceived health varied according to gender: region of birth, lower formal education, having a family income that does not meet needs perfectly /very well, insalubrious housing, not knowing someone who could be asked for money, and having ever received a medical diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, almost half of immigrants without health insurance perceived their health as negative, much higher than reports of negative self-perceived health in previous Canadian studies (8.5% among recent immigrants, 19.8% among long-term immigrants, and 10.6% among Canadian-born). Our study also suggests a high rate of unmet health care needs among migrants with precarious status, a situation that is correlated with poor self-perceived health. There is a need to put social policies in place to secure access to resources, health care and social services for all migrants, with or without authorized status.

Unmet healthcare needs among migrants without medical insurance in Montreal, Canada.

While access to healthcare for permanent residents in Canada is well known, this is not the case for migrants without healthcare coverage. This is the first large-scale study that examines the unmet healthcare needs of migrants without healthcare coverage in Montreal. 806 participants were recruited: 436 in the community and 370 at the NGO clinic. Proportions of individuals reporting unmet healthcare needs were similar (68.4% vs. 69.8%). The main reason invoked for these unmet needs was lacking money (80.6%). Situations of not working or studying, not having had enough food in the past 12 months, not having a medical prescription to get medication and having had a workplace injury were all significantly associated with higher odds of having unmet healthcare needs. Unmet healthcare needs were more frequent among migrants without healthcare coverage than among recent immigrants or the citizens with health healthcare coverage (69%, 26%, 16%). Canada must take measures to enable these individuals to have access to healthcare according to their needs in order to reduce the risk of worsening their health status, something that may have an impact on the healthcare system and population health. The Government of Quebec announced that all individuals without any healthcare coverage will have access to COVID-19 related health care. We hope that this right, the application of which is not yet obvious, can continue after the pandemic for all health care.

The Importance of Leadership and Organizational Capacity in Shaping Health Workers' Motivational Reactions to Performance-Based Financing: A Multiple Case Study in Burkina Faso.

BACKGROUND: Performance-based financing (PBF) is currently tested in many low- and middle-income countries as a health system strengthening strategy. One of the main mechanisms through which PBF is assumed to effect change is by motivating health workers to improve their service delivery performance. This article aims at a better understanding of such motivational effects of PBF. In particular, the study focused on organizational context factors and health workers' perceptions thereof as moderators of the motivational effects of PBF, which to date has been little explored. METHODS: We conducted a multiple case study in 2 district hospitals and 16 primary health facilities across three districts. Health facilities were purposely sampled according to pre-PBF performance levels. Within sampled facilities, 82 clinical skilled healthcare workers were in-depth interviewed one year after the start of the PBF intervention. Data were analyzed using a blended deductive and inductive process, using self-determination theory (SDT) as an analytical framework. RESULTS: Results show that the extent to which PBF contributed to positive, sustainable forms of motivation depended on the "ground upon which PBF fell," beyond health workers' individual personalities and disposition. In particular, health workers described three aspects of the organizational context in which PBF was implemented: the extent to which existing hierarchies fostered as opposed to hindered participation and transparency; managers' handling of the increased performance feedback inherent in PBF; and facility's pre-PBF levels in regards to infrastructure, equipment, and human resources. CONCLUSION: Our results underline the importance of leadership styles and pre-implementation performance levels in shaping health workers' motivational reactions to PBF. Ancillary interventions aimed at fostering participatory as opposed to directional leadership or start-up support to low-performing health facilities will likely boost PBF effects in regards to the development of valuable motivational capacities.