Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Health Commun ; 28(7): 740-6, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23356451

RESUMEN

Undertreatment of pain is common even when caused by serious illness. We examined whether physician-patient communication (particularly language indicating physician certainty) was associated with incomplete (i.e., premature closure) of pain assessment among patients with serious illness. Standardized patients (SPs) trained to portray patients with serious illness conducted unannounced, covertly audio-recorded visits to 20 consenting family physicians and 20 medical specialists. We coded extent of pain assessment, physician voice tone, and a measure of the degree to which physicians explored and validated patient concerns. To assess physician certainty, we searched transcripts for use of words that conveyed certainty using the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count program. SP role fidelity was 94%, and few physicians were suspicious that they had seen an SP (14% of visits). Regression analyses showed that physicians who used more certainty language engaged in less thorough assessment of pain (ß = -0.48, p < .05). Conversely, physicians who engaged in more exploring and validating of patient concerns (ß = 0.27, p < .05) had higher ratings on anxiety/concerned voice tone (ß = 0.25, p <.01) and engaged in more thorough assessment of pain. Together, these three factors accounted for 38% of the variance in pain assessment. Physicians who convey certainty in discussions with patients suffering from pain may be more likely to close prematurely their assessment of pain. We found that expressions of physician concern and responsiveness (curiosity) were associated with superior pain assessment. Further study is needed to determine whether these associations are causal and mutable.


Asunto(s)
Comunicación , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Dimensión del Dolor/psicología , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medio Oeste de Estados Unidos , Simulación de Paciente , Médicos de Familia , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
2.
J Marital Fam Ther ; 47(2): 392-407, 2021 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33615503

RESUMEN

In response to COVID-19, a couple and family therapy (CFT) graduate training program integrated a teaming therapy model with virtual technology using mixed-reality simulation software. By utilizing teaming therapy--a model with strong roots in systemic theory and practice-- combined with cutting-edge simulation technology, this distance learning modality provides distinctly relational therapy supervision and training for students at a time when their internships sites are struggling to offer remote clinical services due to the pandemic. This integrative framework offers a high degree of both realism and safety, allowing experiential learning to be appropriately scaffolded for optimum creativity and engagement in an online setting. This paper describes the conceptual, systemic basis for the learning modality, steps for implementation, benefits of the model, and the authors plan for further evaluation.


Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Competencia Clínica/normas , Terapia de Parejas/educación , Educación a Distancia/organización & administración , Terapia Familiar/educación , Fisioterapeutas/educación , COVID-19/epidemiología , Curriculum , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Telerrehabilitación/organización & administración , Realidad Virtual
3.
J Marital Fam Ther ; 38(1): 265-80, 2012 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22283390

RESUMEN

Intervention research for couples and families managing chronic health problems is in an early developmental stage. We reviewed randomized clinical trials of family interventions for common neurological diseases, cardiovascular diseases, cancer, and diabetes, which is similar to the content of previous reviews discussed later. One overriding theme of these studies is that patients with chronic illnesses and their families face a variety of challenges to which researchers have responded with an array of treatment modalities. Very few of the interventions reviewed, with the exception of treatment for adolescents with diabetes, tested family psychotherapy models. Most interventions were time-limited therapeutic interventions that trained families to improve their communication and problem-solving skills, individual and family coping skills, and medical management. Researchers more clearly described mechanisms of change in intervention studies with cancer and diabetes than with other diseases, and not surprisingly, they found greater empirical support for their interventions. Family interventions show promise to help patients and family members manage chronic illnesses. To develop an empirical base for family approaches to managing chronic illnesses, interventions must be based on theories that delineate mechanisms of change in family processes and skills in medical management necessary to maintain patients' and family members' health.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/terapia , Terapia de Parejas/métodos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Terapia Familiar/métodos , Neoplasias/terapia , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso/terapia , Terapia Combinada , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Humanos , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/métodos , Psicoterapia/métodos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Terapia Socioambiental
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA