Brain-age prediction: Systematic evaluation of site effects, and sample age range and size.

Structural neuroimaging data have been used to compute an estimate of the biological age of the brain (brain-age) which has been associated with other biologically and behaviorally meaningful measures of brain development and aging. The ongoing research interest in brain-age has highlighted the need for robust and publicly available brain-age models pre-trained on data from large samples of healthy individuals. To address this need we have previously released a developmental brain-age model. Here we expand this work to develop, empirically validate, and disseminate a pre-trained brain-age model to cover most of the human lifespan. To achieve this, we selected the best-performing model after systematically examining the impact of seven site harmonization strategies, age range, and sample size on brain-age prediction in a discovery sample of brain morphometric measures from 35,683 healthy individuals (age range: 5-90 years; 53.59% female). The pre-trained models were tested for cross-dataset generalizability in an independent sample comprising 2101 healthy individuals (age range: 8-80 years; 55.35% female) and for longitudinal consistency in a further sample comprising 377 healthy individuals (age range: 9-25 years; 49.87% female). This empirical examination yielded the following findings: (1) the accuracy of age prediction from morphometry data was higher when no site harmonization was applied; (2) dividing the discovery sample into two age-bins (5-40 and 40-90 years) provided a better balance between model accuracy and explained age variance than other alternatives; (3) model accuracy for brain-age prediction plateaued at a sample size exceeding 1600 participants. These findings have been incorporated into CentileBrain (https://centilebrain.org/#/brainAGE2), an open-science, web-based platform for individualized neuroimaging metrics.

deepbet: Fast brain extraction of T1-weighted MRI using Convolutional Neural Networks.

BACKGROUND: Brain extraction in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data is an important segmentation step in many neuroimaging preprocessing pipelines. Image segmentation is one of the research fields in which deep learning had the biggest impact in recent years. Consequently, traditional brain extraction methods are now being replaced by deep learning-based methods. METHOD: Here, we used a unique dataset compilation comprising 7837 T1-weighted (T1w) MR images from 191 different OpenNeuro datasets in combination with advanced deep learning methods to build a fast, high-precision brain extraction tool called deepbet. RESULTS: deepbet sets a novel state-of-the-art performance during cross-dataset validation with a median Dice score (DSC) of 99.0 on unseen datasets, outperforming the current best performing deep learning (DSC=97.9) and classic (DSC=96.5) methods. While current methods are more sensitive to outliers, deepbet achieves a Dice score of >97.4 across all 7837 images from 191 different datasets. This robustness was additionally tested in 5 external datasets, which included challenging clinical MR images. During visual exploration of each method's output which resulted in the lowest Dice score, major errors could be found for all of the tested tools except deepbet. Finally, deepbet uses a compute efficient variant of the UNet architecture, which accelerates brain extraction by a factor of ≈10 compared to current methods, enabling the processing of one image in ≈2 s on low level hardware. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, deepbet demonstrates superior performance and reliability in brain extraction across a wide range of T1w MR images of adults, outperforming existing top tools. Its high minimal Dice score and minimal objective errors, even in challenging conditions, validate deepbet as a highly dependable tool for accurate brain extraction. deepbet can be conveniently installed via "pip install deepbet" and is publicly accessible at https://github.com/wwu-mmll/deepbet.

GateNet: A novel neural network architecture for automated flow cytometry gating.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Flow cytometry is a widely used technique for identifying cell populations in patient-derived fluids, such as peripheral blood (PB) or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Despite its ubiquity in research and clinical practice, the process of gating, i.e., manually identifying cell types, is labor-intensive and error-prone. The objective of this study is to address this challenge by introducing GateNet, a neural network architecture designed for fully end-to-end automated gating without the need for correcting batch effects. METHODS: For this study a unique dataset is used which comprises over 8,000,000 events from N = 127 PB and CSF samples which were manually labeled independently by four experts. Applying cross-validation, the classification performance of GateNet is compared to the human experts performance. Additionally, GateNet is applied to a publicly available dataset to evaluate generalization. The classification performance is measured using the F1 score. RESULTS: GateNet achieves F1 scores ranging from 0.910 to 0.997 demonstrating human-level performance on samples unseen during training. In the publicly available dataset, GateNet confirms its generalization capabilities with an F1 score of 0.936. Importantly, we also show that GateNet only requires ≈10 samples to reach human-level performance. Finally, gating with GateNet only takes 15 microseconds per event utilizing graphics processing units (GPU). CONCLUSIONS: GateNet enables fully end-to-end automated gating in flow cytometry, overcoming the labor-intensive and error-prone nature of manual adjustments. The neural network achieves human-level performance on unseen samples and generalizes well to diverse datasets. Notably, its data efficiency, requiring only ∼10 samples to reach human-level performance, positions GateNet as a widely applicable tool across various domains of flow cytometry.

A Systematic Evaluation of Machine Learning-Based Biomarkers for Major Depressive Disorder.

Importance: Biological psychiatry aims to understand mental disorders in terms of altered neurobiological pathways. However, for one of the most prevalent and disabling mental disorders, major depressive disorder (MDD), no informative biomarkers have been identified. Objective: To evaluate whether machine learning (ML) can identify a multivariate biomarker for MDD. Design, Setting, and Participants: This study used data from the Marburg-Münster Affective Disorders Cohort Study, a case-control clinical neuroimaging study. Patients with acute or lifetime MDD and healthy controls aged 18 to 65 years were recruited from primary care and the general population in Münster and Marburg, Germany, from September 11, 2014, to September 26, 2018. The Münster Neuroimaging Cohort (MNC) was used as an independent partial replication sample. Data were analyzed from April 2022 to June 2023. Exposure: Patients with MDD and healthy controls. Main Outcome and Measure: Diagnostic classification accuracy was quantified on an individual level using an extensive ML-based multivariate approach across a comprehensive range of neuroimaging modalities, including structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion tensor imaging as well as a polygenic risk score for depression. Results: Of 1801 included participants, 1162 (64.5%) were female, and the mean (SD) age was 36.1 (13.1) years. There were a total of 856 patients with MDD (47.5%) and 945 healthy controls (52.5%). The MNC replication sample included 1198 individuals (362 with MDD [30.1%] and 836 healthy controls [69.9%]). Training and testing a total of 4 million ML models, mean (SD) accuracies for diagnostic classification ranged between 48.1% (3.6%) and 62.0% (4.8%). Integrating neuroimaging modalities and stratifying individuals based on age, sex, treatment, or remission status does not enhance model performance. Findings were replicated within study sites and also observed in structural magnetic resonance imaging within MNC. Under simulated conditions of perfect reliability, performance did not significantly improve. Analyzing model errors suggests that symptom severity could be a potential focus for identifying MDD subgroups. Conclusion and Relevance: Despite the improved predictive capability of multivariate compared with univariate neuroimaging markers, no informative individual-level MDD biomarker-even under extensive ML optimization in a large sample of diagnosed patients-could be identified.