Effects of enhanced external counterpulsation on stress radionuclide coronary perfusion and exercise capacity in chronic stable angina pectoris.

Enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) is an effective noninvasive treatment for patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). EECP has been demonstrated to improve anginal class and time to ST-segment depression during exercise stress testing. This study assesses the efficacy of EECP in improving stress-induced myocardial ischemia using radionuclide perfusion treadmill stress tests (RPSTs). The international study group enrolled patients from 7 centers with chronic stable angina pectoris and a baseline ischemic pre-EECP RPST. Patients' demographic and clinical characteristics were recorded. A baseline pre-EECP maximal RPST was performed within 1 month before EECP treatment. The results were compared with a follow-up RPST performed within 6 months of completion of a 35-hour course of EECP. Four centers performed post-EECP RPST to the same level of exercise as pre-EECP, whereas 3 centers performed maximal RPST post-EECP. The study enrolled 175 patients (155 men and 20 women). Improvement in angina, defined by > or =1 Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina class change, was reported in 85% of patients. In the centers performing the same level of exercise, 81 of 97 patients (83%) had significant improvement in RPST perfusion images. Patients who underwent maximal RPST revealed improvement in exercise duration (6.61 +/- 1.88 pre-EECP vs 7.41 +/- 2.03 minutes post-EECP, p <0.0001); 42 of the 78 patients (54%) in this group showed significant improvement in RPST perfusion images. Thus, EECP was effective in improving stress myocardial perfusion in patients with chronic stable angina at both comparable (baseline) and at maximal exercise levels.

Enhanced external counterpulsation in patients with heart failure: a multicenter feasibility study.

To assess the feasibility of using enhanced external counterpulsation to treat patients with heart failure, 26 patients with stable heart failure (New York Heart Association classes II-III), with a left ventricular ejection fraction at or below 35%, and without fluid overload, were treated with enhanced external counterpulsation (1 hour daily, 5 days a week, to a total of 35 hours). Patients were followed for 6 months after completing the course of enhanced external counterpulsation. The primary parameter was safety as reflected by adverse events or by changes in laboratory parameters. Secondary end points included changes in exercise capacity and quality of life. There were no clinically significant problems associated with the administration of enhanced external counterpulsation. Significant improvements were seen in exercise capacity (peak oxygen uptake and exercise duration), and in quality of life assessments, at 1 week and 6 months after the course of enhanced external counterpulsation. This study suggests that enhanced external counterpulsation is safe and well tolerated in patients with stable heart failure, and that a randomized, controlled study of enhanced external counterpulsation in these patients is warranted.

Effects of enhanced external counterpulsation on Health-Related Quality of Life continue 12 months after treatment: a substudy of the Multicenter Study of Enhanced External Counterpulsation.

BACKGROUND: The Multicenter Study of Enhanced External Counterpulsation (MUST-EECP) was the first prospective, randomized, blinded, sham-controlled study of enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) in the treatment of chronic stable angina. We previously reported that EECP therapy lengthens the time to exercise-induced myocardial ischemia and reduces angina. We now describe the effects of EECP therapy versus a sham-treated control group in terms of patients' functioning, their senses of well-being and other Health-Related Quality Of Life (HQOL) parameters from baseline to end of treatment and from baseline to 12 months after treatment. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a 35-hour course of EECP affects the HQOL of patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease, 12 months following treatment. METHODS: Seventy-one of the 139 patients enrolled in MUST-EECP provided evaluable patient-completed questionnaires at baseline, at the end of treatment, and 12 months post-treatment. The Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey and the Quality of Life Index-Cardiac Version III were used to assess effects on HQOL. RESULTS: Both groups had similar HQOL scores at baseline. At end of treatment and at 12-month follow up, patients who had active-CP reported greater improvement than those who had inactive-CP in all nine quality of life scales, including ability to perform activities of daily living, ability to work, bodily pain, confidence in health, energy, ability to engage in social activities with family and friends, anxiety and depression, and quality of life issues from the effects of angina on health and functioning. Despite small sample sizes, active-CP patients demonstrated significantly greater improvement at 12 months following treatment in bodily pain, social functioning, and quality of life specific to cardiac patients compared with inactive-CP patients. CONCLUSION: Significant health-related quality of life improvements were measurable up to 12 months after the completion of treatment with EECP. Improvements in this controlled study are consistent with HQOL changes reported in case series and patient registries. Larger studies are warranted.

Enhanced external counterpulsation improves exercise tolerance in patients with chronic heart failure.

OBJECTIVES: The PEECH (Prospective Evaluation of Enhanced External Counterpulsation in Congestive Heart Failure) study assessed the benefits of enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) in the treatment of patients with mild-to-moderate heart failure (HF). BACKGROUND: Enhanced external counterpulsation reduced angina symptoms and extended time to exercise-induced ischemia in patients with coronary artery disease, angina, and normal left ventricular function. A small pilot study and registry analysis suggested benefits in patients with HF. METHODS: We randomized 187 subjects with mild-to-moderate symptoms of HF to either EECP and protocol-defined pharmacologic therapy (PT) or PT alone. Two co-primary end points were pre-defined: the percentage of subjects with a 60 s or more increase in exercise duration and the percentage of subjects with at least 1.25 ml/min/kg increase in peak volume of oxygen uptake (VO2) at 6 months. RESULTS: By the primary intent-to-treat analysis, 35% of subjects in the EECP group and 25% of control subjects increased exercise time by at least 60 s (p = 0.016) at 6 months. However, there was no between-group difference in peak VO2 changes. New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class improved in the active treatment group at 1 week (p < 0.01), 3months (p < 0.02), and 6 months (p < 0.01). The Minnesota Living with Heart Failure score improved significantly 1 week (p < 0.02) and 3 months after treatment (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In this randomized, single-blinded study, EECP improved exercise tolerance, quality of life, and NYHA functional classification without an accompanying increase in peak VO2.